On 10/17/18 7:55 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Oct 17, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 17/10/2018 20:03, Warren Young wrote:
On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell wrote:
launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice
Try doing without launchd on macOS.
If laun
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 10/17/18 7:55 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> Benno Rice is right: Lennart Poettering gets stuff done.
Because he's funded. And I strongly suspect that a lot of that funding
comes from M$'s interest in Upstream.
>
> With all due respect, many people just stopped offering an
On 18.10.2018 00:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
The bottom line .. we don't make the decision whether or not to use
systemd or not. We rebuild RHEL source code.
will there come a CentOS 6.11 which will be capable of TLS1.3 or HTTP/2?
I'm sure there will come a CentOS 8, but when is it probable to be
On 10/18/18 1:36 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 18.10.2018 00:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
The bottom line .. we don't make the decision whether or not to use
systemd or not. We rebuild RHEL source code.
will there come a CentOS 6.11 which will be capable of TLS1.3 or HTTP/2?
I'm sure there will come a
Is there some way to see what version will be installed by an installation
disc? I made a USB installer and I forgot whether it's CentOS 7.3 or 7.5.
Short of running the whole installer and seeing what happens, I can't see
any way to get this info from within Anaconda.
On 10/18/2018 02:28 PM, Elliott Balsley wrote:
> Is there some way to see what version will be installed by an installation
> disc? I made a USB installer and I forgot whether it's CentOS 7.3 or 7.5.
> Short of running the whole installer and seeing what happens, I can't see
> any way to get this
On 10/18/2018 12:36 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> On 18.10.2018 00:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> The bottom line .. we don't make the decision whether or not to use
>> systemd or not. We rebuild RHEL source code.
> will there come a CentOS 6.11 which will be capable of TLS1.3 or HTTP/2?
> I'm sure there wi
> From a end state perspective, it does not matter . . yum update after
> the install (of either) ends at exactly the same place.
I will not be running any updates, because I need to keep a specific old
version for software compatibility. I don't know which ISO the USB stick
was made from.
>
> A
Elliott Balsley wrote:
>> From a end state perspective, it does not matter . . yum update after
>> the install (of either) ends at exactly the same place.
>
> I will not be running any updates, because I need to keep a specific old
> version for software compatibility. I don't know which ISO the US
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:27:32AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
[topical reply trimmed for brevity]
Please learn how to trim your replies. Rough count and 145 lines of
crap could have been removed from your recent post. This is getting
a bit ridiculous, Valeri:
https://wiki.centos.org/Getting
On 18/10/18 22:09, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:27:32AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
[topical reply trimmed for brevity]
Please learn how to trim your replies. Rough count and 145 lines of
crap could have been removed from your recent post. This is getting
a bit ridiculo
On Oct 18, 2018, at 9:41 AM, mark wrote:
> On 10/17/18 7:55 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>>> Benno Rice is right: Lennart Poettering gets stuff done.
>
> Because he's funded.
There are plenty of people with jobs that don’t get stuff done.
> I strongly suspect that a lot of that funding
> comes from
On 10/18/2018 4:41 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Oct 18, 2018, at 9:41 AM, mark wrote:
people are tired of screaming and yelling about
systemd, because we've had years now of the response being "tough, it's
the Wave of the Future"
We covered that back when RHEL 7 was still in beta: the time is fa
On 10/18/18 4:14 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/18/2018 12:36 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 18.10.2018 00:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
The bottom line .. we don't make the decision whether or not to use
systemd or not. We rebuild RHEL source code.
will there come a CentOS 6.11 which will be capable o
On Oct 18, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
>
> Conoboy, on the other hand, takes great pains during the speech to describe a
> much more fluid and complex interaction between CentOS and its upstream, and
> puts forth CentOS as a mechanism (perhaps the best mechanism) for the winder
>
On Oct 18, 2018, at 7:35 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> It is certainly not a lot of work
Typo: remove “not”. Running your own Linux distro is a *lot* of work. Just
ask our benefactors here!
Also, I should clarify that I’m not calling for action for my own benefit. I’m
a happy CentOS 7 user;
*** This response is my personal opinion and may not reflect that of my
employer. ***
>> people are tired of screaming and yelling about systemd, because we've
>> had years now of the response being "tough, it's the Wave of the
>> Future"
>
>We covered that back when RHEL 7 was still in beta:
No, there is no automated way to move from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7 .. and
we have no idea what will be in CentOS-8 until Red Hat releases RHEL-8.
We have no idea what will be in CentOS-6.11 until Red Hat releases
RHEL-6.11 .. and we have no idea what will be in the release of CentOS-7
until Red Ha
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 10/18/18 4:14 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/18/2018 12:36 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 18.10.2018 00:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
The bottom line .. we don't make the decision whether or not to use
systemd or not. We rebuild RHEL source code.
will
No, there is no automated way to move from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7 .. and
we have no idea what will be in CentOS-8 until Red Hat releases RHEL-8.
We have no idea what will be in CentOS-6.11 until Red Hat releases
RHEL-6.11 .. and we have no idea what will be in the release of CentOS-7
until Red Hat r
20 matches
Mail list logo
