Hi All,I was wondering if anyone else uses InstallAnywhere to create a
multi-platform installer for their products. My company does. However we have
an official build server that is running CentOS, obviously because it is
opensource and easy to update etc. However after we converted our build
How does "make install" with autotools decide which directory libraries
should go in?
I haven't packaged anything since 32-bit (ie. a few years ago), and I now
need to re-package a new version of a library I'd used before with CentOS 6
32-bit on CentOS 7 64-bit.
The library is pxlib (http://
Found the problem. The spec file was using "./configure". Replacing that
with "%configure" caused it to use the correct libdir variable.
It also revealed some more warnings at compile time, so I need to go poke
through those.
___
CentOS mailing list
We have sssd running on a centos 7 box... its logs of course (?!) go into
/can't find any info on where this log directory is configured, or whether it
is changeable.
Anybody know differently?
Cheers
ian
Disclaimer: This message is intended for the addressee only. It may contain
information
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Ian Diddams wrote:
We have sssd running on a centos 7 box... its logs of course (?!) go into
/can't find any info on where this log directory is configured, or whether it
is changeable.
Anybody know differently?
See the -d and -f options in the sssd(8) man page.
--
Pa
I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the
user under which the application runs (NO root access). Is there any
reason why sudo would would require sys_ptrace access for this? I only
get this violation intermittenly, and not with every call to sudo.
Here's the viola
On 08/21/2018 12:27 PM, Nataraj wrote:
I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the
user under which the application runs (NO root access). Is there any
reason why sudo would would require sys_ptrace access for this? I only
get this violation intermittenly, and not w
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:27:53PM -0700, Nataraj wrote:
> Source RPM Packages sudo-1.7.2p1-29.el5_10
> Policy RPMselinux-policy-2.4.6-351.el5
> Platform Linux myhost.mydomain.com 2.6.18-419.el5 #1 SMP
> Fri Feb 24 22:06:09 UTC 2017 i686 i686
Cen
On 08/21/2018 12:41 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:27:53PM -0700, Nataraj wrote:
>> Source RPM Packages sudo-1.7.2p1-29.el5_10
>> Policy RPMselinux-policy-2.4.6-351.el5
>> Platform Linux myhost.mydomain.com 2.6.18-419.el5
On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the
> user under which the application runs (NO root access).
Why is the web app not running with that user’s permissions in the first place?
If your answer is that it needs root
On 08/19/2018 09:39 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> Hi Johnny,
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 joh...@centos.org wrote:
>
>> The issue is specifically with the ability to push sources to
>> git.centos.org in the shadow cache.
>>
>> I can't do that in the current setup, only Red Hat RCM can. I can push
>> t
On 08/21/2018 02:20 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>> I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the
>> user under which the application runs (NO root access).
> Why is the web app not running with that user’s permissions in the firs
On Aug 21, 2018, at 4:34 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> On 08/21/2018 02:20 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>> I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the
>>> user under which the application runs (NO root access).
>> Why is the web ap
I ran into something with a recent batch of updates on CentOS 7. It seems that
possibly one of the kernel updates running dracut changed all of the volume
groups in the grub.cfg file making the system unable to boot until I manually
edited each line putting it back to the way it was originally.
14 matches
Mail list logo
