Hello Fred,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:53:16 -0500 Fred Smith
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've finally been reduced to having to install Skype on my Linux box.
> I resisted for years, but now ended up trying it.
>
> and while the latest RPM installs just fine, it refuses to acknowledge
> that I have a m
OS: EL6 - sometimes I use
kpartx -a /mnt/.../lvdisk.img
to map the partitions and mount them via
/dev/mapper/loop0pX
After using the disk (unmounting it) I noticed that
detaching such mapping via kpartx -d does not result
in freeing up the loop devices. Results: System reboots
shows that
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 2 March 2018 at 12:07, hw wrote:
Oh yeah. Who ever gave you those marching orders needs to talk with
all kinds of lawyers... even researching for it might be problematic
in some countries due to a multitude of laws. You are walking out of
setting up a wireless e
Pete Biggs wrote:
That´s not my problem to solve, but think about it: You can get a lot more
information using CCTV cameras, and those are everywhere. Unfortunately,
nobody cares, and it´s not like you have a choice. So why would there
be any legal issues?
It's called "A Law". Different pl
Pete Biggs wrote:
What do you want?
I was asking for documentation telling me how RADIUS can be used, not only
that it can be used.
RADIUS is just an authentication (plus a bit more) protocol - what you
are asking is like asking how LDAP can be used. Usually it's treated
like a magic black
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 03/01/2018 09:26 AM, hw wrote:
I was asking for documentation telling me how RADIUS can be used, not only
that it can be used.
RADIUS is a backend component of 802.1x and WPA2 Enterprise. You appear to be
looking for information on how to use those two. If you look
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 03/01/2018 03:06 AM, hw wrote:
It is illogical to lump all network access together into a single category.
...
If your device can communicate with a switch, even for the purpose of
authenticating, then it has network access.
The device has access to the switch whi
On 03/07/2018 04:48 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> OS: EL6 - sometimes I use
>
> kpartx -a /mnt/.../lvdisk.img
>
> to map the partitions and mount them via
>
> /dev/mapper/loop0pX
>
> After using the disk (unmounting it) I noticed that
> detaching such mapping via kpartx -d does not result
>
CentUS 7.4
>From sealert:
SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/sshd from read access on the file
/etc/ssh/moduli.
* Plugin restorecon (94.8 confidence) suggests
If you want to fix the label.
/etc/ssh/moduli default label should be etc_t.
Then you can run restorecon.
Do
I have a couple of CentOS 7 machines running in a vmware environment. On
all the older ones I've deployed, the NIC is named ens160, but on all of
the new ones, it is named ens192. I can't find any difference in the
hardware that would account for this.
Any suggestions on what I can do to figur
Hi,
The older running Centos 7?
All machines are in the same vmware host?
It is not your case, but are interesting:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2592561
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:31 PM, John Ratliff wrote:
> I have a couple of CentOS 7 machines running in a vmware environment. On
> all
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:31 AM, John Ratliff wrote:
> I have a couple of CentOS 7 machines running in a vmware environment. On
> all the older ones I've deployed, the NIC is named ens160, but on all of
> the new ones, it is named ens192. I can't find any difference in the
> hardware that would ac
-Original Message-
From: CentOS On Behalf Of John Ratliff
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:31 PM
To: CentOS
Subject: [CentOS] NIC naming conventions and vmware
> I have a couple of CentOS 7 machines running in a vmware environment. On
> all the older ones I've deployed, the NIC is named
Le 06/03/2018 à 18:48, hw a écrit :
> And how do you get a list of IPs from which data could be retrieved
> which the students are not supposed to see?
>
> How is this done anyway, does the government give out a list of URLs
> or IPs which you are required to block? If not, what if you overlook
>
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:57 AM hw wrote:
> Apparently Cisco can do it:
>
>
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/wireless-location-appliance/product_data_sheet0900aecd80293728.html
I was going to mention Cisco WCS which uses wireless “controllers” and
“lightweight” acces
15 matches
Mail list logo
