If your requirement is for the entire system to be encrypted then I think the
only is a system rebuild, but if you can convince management that a good
compromise is encrypting only the applications and their data, you should be
able to add encrypted storage, copy the sensitive files and wipe the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Kern, Thomas (CONTR) wrote:
If your requirement is for the entire system to be encrypted then I think
the only is a system rebuild, but if you can convince management that a good
compromise is encrypting only the applications and their data, you should be
able to add encrypt
John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Kern, Thomas (CONTR) wrote:
>
>> If your requirement is for the entire system to be encrypted then I
>> think the only is a system rebuild, but if you can convince management
that a
>> good compromise is encrypting only the applications and their data, you
I am setting up a Samba 4 installation on CentOS 6.9. I have installed
the samba4, samba4-common, and samba4-libs with all of the dependencies
using YUM which appear to be all of the samba4 packages which are
available.
In the /usr/bin directory I can find smbcontrol and smbstatus but the
smbpa
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Kienker, Fred wrote:
> I am setting up a Samba 4 installation on CentOS 6.9. I have installed
> the samba4, samba4-common, and samba4-libs with all of the dependencies
> using YUM which appear to be all of the samba4 packages which are
> available.
>
>
>
> In the
Hi
I have a Centos server that crashed, it would no longer boot. I thought it was
the disk with the OS that was the problem so I bought a new one and did a fresh
install and now the computer is again up and running. But I'm having problems
with accessing the old failed disk. I can see it with g
Am 13.12.2017 um 22:31 schrieb martin.wag...@mailbit.io:
> I have a Centos server that crashed, it would no longer boot. I thought it
> was the disk with the OS that was the problem so I bought a new one and did a
> fresh install and now the computer is again up and running. But I'm having
> pr
Hi all,
I am trying to virtually connect two bridges on different network namespaces
inside a CentOS KVM host. I have tried different configs, but this is the most
closer than I can test:
ip netns add pubnet
ip netns exec pubnet ip link set dev lo up
ip netns exec pubne
On 13/12/17 21:42, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 13.12.2017 um 22:31 schrieb martin.wag...@mailbit.io:
>
>> I have a Centos server that crashed, it would no longer boot. I thought it
>> was the disk with the OS that was the problem so I bought a new one and did
>> a fresh install and now the computer
9 matches
Mail list logo