Sorin,
Indeed, CentOS 6 is not longer officially supported by Chrome. It hasn't been
for a few years, though there are workarounds[1].
It's high time people migrated to EL7.
[1] -
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el6/x86_64/chrome-deps-stable-3.11-1.x86_64.rpm
--
Sent from the Delta quadr
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nux!
> Sent: den 28 november 2017 09:17
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6
>
> Sorin,
>
> Indeed, CentOS 6 is not longer officially supported by Chrome. It hasn't
been
> >
> > - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. (Things get a lot
> > quieter when you do that, but it comes with it's own problems and don't
> > get complacent because someone will find the port eventually.)
>
> I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity.
That wasn't meant as
Hi Valeri,
> Good luck! Use strong passwords (passphrase I call it when I talk to my
> users), especially for root account.
if possible: Do not use passwords at all. Disable password login, and replace
by SSH private/public key authentication, and, again if possible, with OTP (two
factor authe
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:07:36PM +0100, H wrote:
>
> OK, I have no interest in Flash, however.
If you don't mind installing singularity
(https://github.com/singularityware/singularity), you can
run a CentOS-7 docker based container with google-chrome
at the expense of disk space.
If you
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single
rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things
just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the
opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the
point release.
What is the case with users o
On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single
rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things
just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the
opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to
On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>
>> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single
>> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things
>> just work between point releases. On the other hand I see t
On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Pete Biggs wrote:
- don't run ssh on 22, use a different port.
I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity.
Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits
are in a similar class; they don't help with security in
On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is the case with users on this list who support both [rolling releases
like the normal CentOS model and 'constrain to the point releases' as is
possible with RHEL]?
I personally run RHEL just like my CentOS installs, as a rolling release.
I
On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote:
>> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>>
>>> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single
>>> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things
>>> just wo
On 11/28/2017 04:09 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
- don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. (Things get a lot
quieter when you do that, but it comes with it's own problems and don't
get complacent because someone will find the port eventually.)
I consider that pointless security-through-obscu
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single
> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things
> just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the
> opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the
> point relea
On 11/28/2017 10:20 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single
>> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things
>> just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the
>> opposite with RHEL whe
On Tue, November 28, 2017 9:21 am, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Pete Biggs wrote:
>>>- don't run ssh on 22, use a different port.
>> I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity.
> Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Ta
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:04:14AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Tue, November 28, 2017 9:21 am, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> Pete Biggs wrote:
> >>>- don't run ssh on 22, use a different port.
> >> I consider that pointless security-through-o
On 11/28/2017 12:04 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Thanks, Lamar! that is very instructive.
You're welcome.
I was always unimpressed with
persistence of attempts to make more secure (less pickable) cylinder cased
locks (precision, multi-level, pins at a weird locations/angles).
The best way to
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 12:04 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Thanks, Lamar! that is very instructive.
> You're welcome.
>
>> I was always unimpressed with
>> persistence of attempts to make more secure (less pickable) cylinder
>> cased
>> locks (precision, multi-level, pins at a weird loc
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:06 AM Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> On the other hand I see the
> opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the
> point release.
This is most commonly due to 3rd party support stipulations (I’m looking at
you Oracle/SAP) who haven’t/won’t/lag test a fully
Am 28.11.2017 um 12:29 schrieb Tru Huynh :
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:07:36PM +0100, H wrote:
>>
>> OK, I have no interest in Flash, however.
>
> If you don't mind installing singularity
> (https://github.com/singularityware/singularity), you can
> run a CentOS-7 docker based container with
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 03:52:36PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On 11/28/2017 12:04 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >> Thanks, Lamar! that is very instructive.
> > You're welcome.
> >
> >> I was always unimpressed with
> >> persistence of attempts to make more secure (less p
I've a system that has been running CentOS 6 64-bit for almost 4-years
and I want to start the move to CentOS 7 64-bit.
I run software RAID-1 with LVM everywhere except /boot which is a
standard partition RAID-1. There are 2 areas that concern me greatly
about this migration:
1. How do I d
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L.
> Casale
> Sent: den 28 november 2017 14:06
> To: 'centos@centos.org'
> Subject: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS
>
> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a sin
Le 29/11/2017 à 08:26, Sorin Srbu a écrit :
> If updated, the instrument software will break, like in an atomic mushroom
> cloud, rendering critical hardware non-working and lab people standing
> outside my office with torches, pitch-forks and all the shebang.
> Yupp, unfortunately that's the curre
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas
> Kovacs
> Sent: den 29 november 2017 08:31
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS
>
> Le 29/11/2017 à 08:26, Sorin Srbu a écrit :
> > If updated, the
26 matches
Mail list logo
