Hi,
I just moved my main mail account and web content from a low-cost
(low-quality) provider to my own root server running CentOS 7. I
transferred the domain name from DNS management to my registrar,
configured BIND, Apache, Postfix, Dovecot, NTP, SELinux, etc. Now things
are running rather nicely
>
> In your experience, what's the "longest" a DNS cache is configured to
> keep outdated information? A day? A week? A month? Longer?
>
That is controlled by the TTL (time to live) entry. A DNS server must
refresh it's cache within the TTL for the entry. Using the '-a' option
to host will give
Le 01/07/2017 à 11:00, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> That is controlled by the TTL (time to live) entry. A DNS server must
> refresh it's cache within the TTL for the entry. Using the '-a' option
> to host will give you more information:
So I would have to use the -a option with the old DNS server, to kn
On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 11:37 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 01/07/2017 à 11:00, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> > That is controlled by the TTL (time to live) entry. A DNS server must
> > refresh it's cache within the TTL for the entry. Using the '-a' option
> > to host will give you more information:
>
Original Message
> Date: Saturday, July 01, 2017 10:57:42 +0100
> From: Pete Biggs
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS
>
> On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 11:37 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Le 01/07/2017 à 11:00, Pete Biggs a écrit :
>> > Tha
-Original Message-
From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James B.
Byrne
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:43 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] rsync and cause/source of an empty file
> We transfer files from a VAN provider at 15 minute intervals using
> rsync o
On 06/29/2017 05:06 PM, adam_kalisz wrote:
Do you have any ideas? What logs/ information should I provide if you
want to have a look into this.
Run "vgs" to see if the drives brought up an old volume group. Run "pvs"
to see if they were imported into the volume group you were already
using
On 06/30/2017 08:47 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
My first take is that this doesn't represent a very serious threat. Do
you disagree?
The module doesn't represent an unknown security flaw, so my inclination
is to say "no." I'd also note that if your systems aren't extremely
old, they probably bo
On 06/30/2017 01:42 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
The setup is somewhat complicated in that the VAN
will not permit direct rsync access and so we establish the link via
sshfs and then mount remote location as local.
sshfs doesn't seem to preserve/transmit ctime, so rsync won't be able to
reliably
> You should check to see if your old SOA is still showing themselves
> as authoritative for your domain. If they are, then anyone who uses
> their nameservers will still get the old record(s) for your domain.
>
> If they are still showing themselves as authoritative (which I think
> is the case)
Allan wrote:
> I have a Desktop system With both Centos 6 and Centos 7 on it, and
> it works fine with my Ryzen 1700X cpu.
>
> Centos 6 preexisten on the system before I upgraded it to Ryzen,
> Centos 7 was installed with Ryzen. Never had any problems.
I've tried reinstalling CentOS 6 from s
Hello Guys,
While i work out the snapper on fedora 25 I've learnd more about python
and snapper.
Here the changes:
Snapper:
Created a combat util-linux 2.24.2 from fedora 20, static only.
This make snapper rollback available (needfull thing). Tryed to patch
snapper, there are to many changes. T
12 matches
Mail list logo
