I'm seeing a problem that I think maybe a bug with the mdraid software on the
latest CentOS installer. I have a couple of new supermicro servers and each
system has two innodisk 32GB SATADOM's that are experiencing the same issue. I
used the latest CentOS-7-x86_64-1611 to install to the two SATA
Is there a reason you are not using the built in controller to RAID the
SATADOMs?
As I remember on SuperMicro there are two controllers. One for the SATADOMs
and another for the conventional disks.
Cameron
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:28 PM, David C. Miller
wrote:
> I'm seeing a problem that I th
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:28 PM, David C. Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm seeing a problem that I think maybe a bug with the mdraid software on
>> the latest CentOS installer. I have a couple of new supermicro servers and
>> each system has two innodisk 32GB SATADOM's that are experiencing the sam
Hello list,
I'm contemplating running my own CA to implement the new proposed ISP
for validation of S/MIME certificates via DANE.
I already use self-signed for my MX servers (with 3 1 1 dane records on
TCP port 25) but I don't want to use self-signed for S/MIME for user
specific x.509 certs
On 04/11/2017 04:16 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
Hi, I would like to see this addressed.
Is there a firewalld solution to this issue?
Yes:
# Disable connection tracking for UDP DNS traffic
#
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01183/0/Linux-connection-tracking-and-DNS.html
firewall-cmd --permanent --d
On 04/14/2017 06:54 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 04/11/2017 04:16 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
Hi, I would like to see this addressed.
Is there a firewalld solution to this issue?
Yes:
# Disable connection tracking for UDP DNS traffic
#
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01183/0/Linux-connection-track
https://www.openca.org/ might fit my needs.
On 04/14/2017 06:29 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
Hello list,
I'm contemplating running my own CA to implement the new proposed ISP
for validation of S/MIME certificates via DANE.
I already use self-signed for my MX servers (with 3 1 1 dane records on
TCP
On 09/04/17 14:39, Anthony K wrote:
So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you
still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it?
Thanks for all those that responded. systemd still appears to be a sore
topic.
systemd is still coping a whole
8 matches
Mail list logo
