Re: [CentOS] Network Manager / CentOS 7 / local unbound

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
OR just make the file immutable if it's so critical to you. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Jon LaBadie" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 07:16:22 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network Manager /

Re: [CentOS] Network Manager / CentOS 7 / local unbound

2017-04-12 Thread Alice Wonder
I think configuring NetworkManager not to touch it is the right solution. Unless there are cases where NetworkManager ignores its configuration but I haven't seen those. A fancier solution might be to have some kind of systemd script that rewrites it if and only if the unbound daemon has succ

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 09/04/17 05:39, Anthony K wrote: > So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you > still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? I think the points been made, can we all move along and let this thread be. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 |

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Holway
> > I think the points been made, can we all move along and let this thread be. > SystemD RULES! :D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Holway
Hallo, Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a Slack for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, its a fantastic tool for community support with really nice features for computer centric discussion. https://enterpriselinux.slack.com/shar

Re: [CentOS] Ignoring /run/user/X

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article , Cameron Smith wrote: > We are running into an issue relating to snmpd and the temporary partitions > created in /run/user/ so any insight by someone with magical > net-snmp skills would be much appreciated. > > Our monitoring app walks all our servers. > We modify /etc/snmp/snmpd.con

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/12/2017 05:23 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: Hallo, Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a Slack for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, its a fantastic tool for community support with really nice features for computer centric disc

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/12/2017 05:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/12/2017 05:23 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: Hallo, Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a Slack for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, its a fantastic tool for community support with r

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Holway
Don't think so. I'm getting slack mail from Received: from mail-71-234.slack.com (mail-71-234.slack.com. [166.78.71.234]) On 12 April 2017 at 14:35, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/12/2017 05:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > >> On 04/12/2017 05:23 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> >>> Hallo, >>> >>> Consider

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/04/17 13:23, Andrew Holway wrote: > > Thoughts? Experiances? > been talking with the mattermost people to get an instance up in centos.org space - more open source, more privacy and better terms of service. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh G

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-12 Thread Leroy Tennison
Why don't we discuss something ***less*** controversial, like politics or religion? - Original Message - From: "Karanbir Singh" To: "centos" Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:19:43 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll On 09/04/17 05:39, Anthony K wrote: > So, at which stage are yo

[CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: Why don't we discuss something ***less*** controversial, like politics or religion? Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm always reminded of some TV clip I saw when I was young and can't place of a bunch of old peopl

[CentOS] qcow2 --> logical volume

2017-04-12 Thread Scott Gennari
Hello CentOS community members, A hardware vendor provided us with a .qcow2 file to run on our KVM hypervisor file that will monitor/control said hardware (firewall). I'd like to import this .qcow2 to run as a logical volume (named 'server3') in an existing logical group named 'centos' on our

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, April 12, 2017 8:07 am, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: >> Why don't we discuss something ***less*** >> controversial, like politics or religion? >> > > Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm > always reminded of some TV clip

Re: [CentOS] qcow2 --> logical volume

2017-04-12 Thread Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE
Le 12/04/2017 à 15:31, Scott Gennari a écrit : How would can you import/migrate this .qcow2 into a logical volume? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. - get size of qcow2 image: qemu-img info yourFile.qcow2 - create a logical volume of same size: ssm create -s xxxb -n yourLvName -p

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread m . roth
Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, April 12, 2017 8:07 am, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: >>> Why don't we discuss something ***less*** >>> controversial, like politics or religion? >> >> Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm >> always

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-12 Thread m . roth
Andrew Holway wrote: >> >> I think the points been made, can we all move along and let this thread >> be. >> > > SystemD RULES! > > :D systemd may be worse than Sean Spicer (You *did* read the news yesterday eve, right?) mark ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Ignoring /run/user/X

2017-04-12 Thread Cameron Smith
Thanks Tony. Looks like it's possibly handled in this file: https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/master/tree/agent/mibgroup/host/hr_disk.c I will dig :) Cameron On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article mail.gmail.com>, > Cameron Smith wrote: > > We are run

Re: [CentOS] Ignoring /run/user/X

2017-04-12 Thread James Pearson
Cameron Smith wrote: > We are running into an issue relating to snmpd and the temporary partitions > created in /run/user/ so any insight by someone with magical > net-snmp skills would be much appreciated. > > Our monitoring app walks all our servers. > We modify /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf on all our se

[CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

2017-04-12 Thread Mark (Netbook)
Hello, I have an Intel NUC7i3 with 620 graphics and an Intel NUC7i7 with 640 graphics. I have loaded CentOS 6.9 and the graphics is not fully working. I believe that I need a driver. Does CentOS support the Intel 620 and 640 graphics and if not, can someone please point me in the direction of the

Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
Give kernel-ml a try, else try CentOS 7. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Mark (Netbook)" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 17:13:56 > Subject: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics > Hello

Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

2017-04-12 Thread Mark (Netbook)
Hello, Where do I find kernel-ml? Regards, Mark Woolfson -Original Message- From: Nux! Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:18 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics Give kernel-ml a try, else try CentOS 7. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Bor

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with anything. So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help. If we go Mattermost, can we have a searchable public archive of the chats? Something search engines can index and we can point people to? -- Sent from the Delta

Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

2017-04-12 Thread Nux!
Google ? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Mark (Netbook)" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 17:25:12 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics > Hello, > > Where do I find kerne

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Phelps, Matthew
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Nux! wrote: > To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with > anything. > So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help. > > IRC is a problem for those of us behind government/corporate firewalls. IRC is perceived as a hacker have

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/12/2017 09:36 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Nux! wrote: To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with anything. So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help. IRC is a problem for those of us behind government/corporate f

Re: [CentOS] Network Manager / CentOS 7 / local unbound

2017-04-12 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90035/how-to-set-dns-resolver-in-fedora-using-network-manager > > That says it works for CentOS 5 and I *suspect* the methods there (3 listed) > would work Across comments, there are actually more than

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Phelps, Matthew
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/12/2017 09:36 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Nux! wrote: >> >> To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with >>> anything. >>> So cool to be a "/join #project" away from gettin

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread m . roth
Andrew Holway wrote: > Hallo, > > Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a > Slack > for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, > its a fantastic tool for community support with really nice features for > computer centric discussion. > > h

Re: [CentOS] Ignoring /run/user/X

2017-04-12 Thread Cameron Smith
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:13 AM, James Pearson wrote: > > > Does anybody have a recommendation on how we can stop those partitions > from > > being seen on walks so we can stop being alerted about partitions for > which > > we are not interested in monitoring their available space? > > You could

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread m . roth
Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Alice Wonder > wrote: >> On 04/12/2017 09:36 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Nux! wrote: >>> >>> To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with anything.So cool to be a "/join #p

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Holway
> > Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it > that way before > Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for things like init were focussed on this. In 1995 is

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Holway
> > Not enthused with slack. And here's a real question: were you talking > about *instead* of this mailing list? No, certainly not instead of. A mailing list is essential. I'm part of a few slack communities and it seems an excellent platform for realtime discourse and noob baiting. Very sadly t

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/04/17 17:26, Nux! wrote: > To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with anything. Dont need to replace it, MatterMost will bridge channels from one interface to another, with a mostly usable interface. > So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help. > > I

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread m . roth
Andrew Holway wrote: >> >> Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it >> that way before >> > Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went > from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for > things like init wer

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Nux! wrote: > >> To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with >> anything. >> So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help. >> >> > IRC is a problem for those of us behi

Re: [CentOS] qcow2 --> logical volume

2017-04-12 Thread Scott Gennari
On 04/12/2017 10:19 AM, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: Le 12/04/2017 à 15:31, Scott Gennari a écrit : How would can you import/migrate this .qcow2 into a logical volume? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. - get size of qcow2 image: qemu-img info yourFile.qcow2 - create a logical

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> >> Not enthused with slack. And here's a real question: were you talking >> about *instead* of this mailing list? > > > No, certainly not instead of. A mailing list is essential. I'm part of a > few slack communities and it seems an excellen

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 12/04/2017 à 19:41, Andrew Holway a écrit : > Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went > from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for > things like init were focussed on this. In 1995 is was common for server > platforms to have 32Mb

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, April 12, 2017 1:31 pm, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 12/04/2017 à 19:41, Andrew Holway a écrit : >> Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went >> from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for >> things like init were focussed on this

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Holway
> > When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years down > the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing about > Windows. > All in the name of progress.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.cent

[CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Jerry Geis
Hello all I seem to be running into a subject length issue on email. Is there any way to increase that ? Thanks, jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 12.04.2017 um 21:27 schrieb Jerry Geis: Hello all I seem to be running into a subject length issue on email. Is there any way to increase that ? Thanks, jerry There needs to be more context. Where and how do you face the limit? Client-side or on the mail transport? The RFC defines a limi

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Jerry Geis
Sure... Its local. I run this command: echo "" | mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM" email_test where email_test is my local machine account. The subject gets truncated:

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/12/2017 12:27 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I seem to be running into a subject length issue on email. Is there any way to increase that ? you'll need to be a whole lot more specific. I've seen emails with stupidly long subjects, one message sent to a list recently had the entire message body

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Jerry Geis
Sorry for the extra email. It send to quickly. procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is" jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> >> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years down >> the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing about >> Windows. >> > > All in the name of progress.. I have been told that Windows deve

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/12/2017 12:38 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: Sorry for the extra email. It send to quickly. procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is" sounds like your issue is procmail then... I just used your exact command to send myself a message form a bo

Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS and Intel graphics

2017-04-12 Thread Mark (Netbook)
Hello, I found kernel-ml. Are there any dependencies that I should be aware of? I am trying to apply it to either RHEL 6.9 or CentOS 6.9 Regards, Mark Woolfson -Original Message- From: Nux! Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:28 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re CentOS

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Jerry Geis
So I am using sendmail on C7. I added to the .procmailrc file VERBOSE and a log file. procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is" This command: echo "" | mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Richard
> Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 15:48:06 -0400 > From: Jerry Geis > > So I am using sendmail on C7. > > I added to the .procmailrc file VERBOSE and a log file. > > procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at > 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is" > > This command: > echo "" |

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/12/2017 12:48 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: So I am using sendmail on C7. I added to the .procmailrc file VERBOSE and a log file. procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is" This command: echo "" | mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > No, certainly not instead of. A mailing list is essential. I'm part of a > few slack communities and it seems an excellent platform for realtime > discourse and noob baiting. Very sadly the #centos and #rhel freenode irc > channels se

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/12/2017 12:48 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: So I am using sendmail on C7. ok, wait, I do have a c7 test VM... [piercej@c7test ~]$ echo "" |mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text:OB SURGERY HUMIDITY A

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Jerry Geis
Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as three lines. Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM I'm not getting the second two lines. How "should" one

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Richard
> Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 16:17:38 -0400 > From: Jerry Geis > > Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as > three lines. > > Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point > BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 > %.Informational Text

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: >> No, certainly not instead of. A mailing list is essential. I'm part of a >> few slack communities and it seems an excellent platform for realtime >> discourse and noob bait

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Fred Smith
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:17:38PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as three > lines. > > Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is > in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY >

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, April 12, 2017 2:39 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway > wrote: >>> >>> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years >>> down >>> the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing about >>> Windows. >>> >> >>

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread m . roth
Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway > wrote: >>> >>> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 years >>> down the road Linux started catching up ;-) Then we stopped laughing about >>> Windows. > >> All in the name of progress.. > > I

Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack

2017-04-12 Thread m . roth
Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Billings > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: >>> No, certainly not instead of. A mailing list is essential. I'm part of >>> a few slack communities and it seems an excellent platform for real

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/12/2017 12:39 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: I have been told that Windows developers were taught not to optimize their code for memory/cpu/etc since those could be solved by throwing more hardware at it. Instead they should make clean readable code. Not claiming that is exclusive to Win

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Fred Smith
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:25:52PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/12/2017 12:39 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > > I have been told that Windows developers were taught not to > >optimize their code for memory/cpu/etc since those could be solved by > >throwing more hardware at it. Instead the

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 12.04.2017 um 22:03 schrieb Richard: [ ... ] A "Subject:" line is just a structured text line in the message body and MTAs (e.g., sendmail) don't do anything differently with it than any other line in a message body. The max length is 998 "characters". No, the subject of a mail message is

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 12.04.2017 um 22:24 schrieb Richard: [ ... ] There's supposed to be a "null" line between the structured (header) text lines and the rest of the body. The "Subject:" is generally the last of the structured text lines, so you should be able to start your read with the "Subject:" tag and conti

[CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-12 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Hi, On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On my Slackware servers, I have a rather Keep-It-Simple approach to all things security,

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/12/2017 3:11 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On my Slackware servers, I have a rather Keep-It

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Dave Stevens
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:59:41 -0500 (CDT) "Valeri Galtsev" wrote: > On Wed, April 12, 2017 2:39 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Holway > > wrote: > >>> > >>> When Windows 2000 came out some called it "bloated pig". Some 6 > >>> years down > >>> the road L

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-12 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:38 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > At home, I'm staying on CentOS 6 until it EoLs. Production and development +1 Then FreeBSD ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-12 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 22:45 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit: > On my Slackware servers (no systemd, no funny network interface names), > I just edit /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and switch eth0 > and eth1 (and eth2 etc.) if needed. > > Keep It Simple. Un bon idea ! Ich auch Ikki ook

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

2017-04-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homepage/Centos7-armv7.html I have a caveat I learned with dealing with SELinux and BIND there. On 04/11/2017 01:05 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wr

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/12/2017 06:18 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/12/2017 3:11 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot.

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-12 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:43 PM -0700 John R Pierce wrote: procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is" sounds like your issue is procmail then... I just used your exact command to send myself a message form a bone stock C6 system (s

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

2017-04-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/12/2017 7:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homepage/Centos7-armv7.html noone else can see your local file system -- john r pierce,

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-12 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 13/04/2017 à 00:18, John R Pierce a écrit : > > bind went through a rocky stage where there were a LOT of security holes > in it. by running it in a chroot, you limit its ability to be used as a > hacking point of entry.recent versions of bind (basicially, 9 and > newer) are much more secu

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

2017-04-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
ARGH! That was the local copy I am editing. On 04/13/2017 01:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/12/2017 7:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

2017-04-12 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 13/04/2017 à 04:25, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : > I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on > Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: > > file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homepage/Centos7-armv7.html > > I have a caveat I learned with dealing with SELinu

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

2017-04-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Yep, I messed up, copying from the wrong window. On 04/13/2017 01:22 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:25, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: file:///home/rgm/data/htt

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:41:33PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > > > > Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it > > that way before > > > > Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went > from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-12 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 12/04/2017 à 19:41, Andrew Holway a écrit : > > Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went > > from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for > > things like init were foc

[CentOS] OT apology

2017-04-12 Thread Jon LaBadie
Sorry for those two Unix reminisces that made it to the list. I meant to send them to the poster. jon -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C) __