On 21-03-17 20:51, Diaulas Castro wrote:
Used steps on sysctl from Centos7 FAQ (https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7) and
some gathered on internet
# cat /etc/sysctl.d/90-disable_ipv6.conf
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1
net.ipv6.conf.eth0.disable_ipv6=1
net
Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday.
Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :)
--
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
___
CentOS mailing list
On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday.
>
> Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :)
>
Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sure. Thanks, guys for the great work
you are doing!
Or you as sysadmin know that and just being ironic?
Valeri
>
>
> --
> Mat
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> > Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday.
> >
> > Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :)
> >
> Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sure. Thanks, guys for the great work
> you are doing!
>
>
I have a KVM vm running CentOS-6.8 on a host also running CentOS-6.8.
This instance is used for occasional development projects which
require segregation. Thus it is seldom accessed.
At some point in the recent past this guest developed an issue with
starting. Specifically these messages were
Thanks!
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Gordon Messmer
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:46 PM
To: CentOS mai
Hi Patrick,
I did not disabled on grub or module because of Centos 7 FAQ tips
"Upstream employee Daniel Walsh recommends not disabling the ipv6 module, as
that can cause issues with SELinux and other components, but adding the
following to /etc/sysctl.conf"
So I used only sysctl, but the dhcp
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Looking at transaction 367 more closely we see that the kernel was
> updated to 2.6.32-642.15.1.el6.x86_64 on March 10 but that a number or
> errors, whose nature I do not comprehend, were also reported.
>
> # yum history info 367
> Loaded plugins: etckeeper, fastestmirror,
Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
I've been fighting with this for years. In general, when we have
issues with this system, they are random and/or not repeatable. I've
had very little luck with community support. I hope I don't offend by
saying that! Rather, my b
Matt Garman wrote:
> Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
>
We use it here. I don't think I'm an expert - my manager is - but let me
think about your issues.
> Just to give a little insight into our issues: we have an
> in-house-developed compute job dispatching system.
Feel free to contact me offline if you wish. I'll just go on record as saying
that it's a bear
- On 22 Mar, 2017, at 12:26, Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
| Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
|
| I've been fighting with this for years. In general
On 03/22/2017 08:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday.
>>>
>>> Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :)
>>>
>> Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sur
On 22/03/17 05:31 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 08:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday.
Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out ye
On 03/22/2017 03:26 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
> Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
Not for a good many years.
Are you using v3 or v4 NFS?
Also, you can probably stuff the rpc.gss* and idmapd services into
verbose mode, which may give you a better ideas as to whats go
I apologize if this has been asked and answered, but I googled and
attempted things for several hours today without success.
I have a freshly installed CentOS 7 system that I'd like to disable the
firewall and all iptables rules. Basically the equivalent of doing
iptables -F
In a nutshell I'
On Mar 22, 2017, at 7:56 PM, James Pifer wrote:
> In a nutshell I've tried the following commands, in many different ways and
> orders, but when the system restarts it still seems to end up with some form
> of default rules. It even has a couple rules specifying 192.168.122.0 and I
> can't figu
16 matches
Mail list logo
