Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/14/2017 08:40 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: Well CentOS 7 doesn't use that, and trying to figure out where in the mess of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts the problem is occurring has caused me much frustration. DHCPv6 is really unusual. IPv6 addressing and routing is set up almost entirely

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/15/2017 12:04 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: DHCPv6 is really unusual. IPv6 addressing and routing is set up almost entirely in the kernel, unless you're using static addresses. IPv6 is neither harder nor easier with NetworkManager, in my experience. It was my understanding that most ipv6 n

[CentOS] (re)build sssd-client.i686 for x86_64

2017-02-15 Thread Stijn De Weirdt
hi all, i'm trying to rebuild the current sssd-client.i686 rpm that is part of the x86_64 repo, but i fail to do so. rebuilding the sssd.src.rpm on x86_64 does not produce this rpm. i can rebuild sssd.src.rpm with --target=i686, but that sssd-client rpm has conflicts and a whole bunch of i686 dep

Re: [CentOS] (re)build sssd-client.i686 for x86_64

2017-02-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/15/2017 02:39 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > hi all, > > i'm trying to rebuild the current sssd-client.i686 rpm that is part of > the x86_64 repo, but i fail to do so. rebuilding the sssd.src.rpm on > x86_64 does not produce this rpm. > > i can rebuild sssd.src.rpm with --target=i686, but tha

Re: [CentOS] (re)build sssd-client.i686 for x86_64

2017-02-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/15/2017 03:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/15/2017 02:39 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i'm trying to rebuild the current sssd-client.i686 rpm that is part of >> the x86_64 repo, but i fail to do so. rebuilding the sssd.src.rpm on >> x86_64 does not produce this rpm. >> >> i

Re: [CentOS] (re)build sssd-client.i686 for x86_64

2017-02-15 Thread Andreas Benzler
Johnny, https://git.centos.org/blob/sig-core! bld-seven.git/37012c4fe4f69aa649fdb3e9b1ec002aafd2054f/mock! c7-epel-i686.cfg needs update to 1611 Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento

Re: [CentOS] (re)build sssd-client.i686 for x86_64

2017-02-15 Thread Stijn De Weirdt
hi johnny, apologies, yes this is centos7 on x86_64. i had to set PKGCONFIG_DIR, but that looked like the only thing. i'll give mock a try and see what comes out. thanks a lot stijn On 02/15/2017 10:44 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/15/2017 03:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/15/2017 02

Re: [CentOS] Problems with latest Firefox update -- can't install new extensions

2017-02-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/12/2017 03:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > Since the latest Firefox update to 45.7.0 on my CentOS 6.8 system, I can > no longer install add-ons/extensions. Things LOOK like they're working > but the extensions don't get stored in my normal area and they don't > appear in my Add-Ons menu. Is anyone

[CentOS] vsftp problem C7

2017-02-15 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Hi list, I've a problem with vsftpd on C7.3. This is a dedicated server protected by a Zywall5. SELINUX is disabled. This is my vsftpd configuration: anonymous_enable=NO local_enable=YES write_enable=YES local_umask=022 dirmessage_enable=YES xferlog_enable=YES connect_from_port_20=YES xferlog_

Re: [CentOS] vsftp problem C7

2017-02-15 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Hi list, I've an update: I've changed listen_port from 21 to 10021 restarted again vsftpd and problem is solved. I can't understand whats happened. Any ideas? Il 15/02/2017 13:37, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto: Hi list, I've a problem with vsftpd on C7.3. This is a dedicated server protecte

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Leroy Tennison
Too much temptation to resist, I don't know which one of us is older but I have a feeling it's a "horse race". Like you, I still have a land line, WiFi is too slow and "WiFi security" seems to be an oxymoronic phrase. Why people text (or IM for that matter) anything other than a one-liner is b

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/15/2017 07:34 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: > Too much temptation to resist, I don't know which one of us is older but I > have a feeling it's a "horse race". Like you, I still have a land line, WiFi > is too slow and "WiFi security" seems to be an oxymoronic phrase. Why people > text (or IM

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer said: > DHCPv6 is really unusual. IPv6 addressing and routing is set up > almost entirely in the kernel, unless you're using static addresses. > IPv6 is neither harder nor easier with NetworkManager, in my > experience. Not sure about the version in CentOS, but i

[CentOS] SOLVED - Re: Centos7 and old Bind bug

2017-02-15 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Thanks Gordon... On 02/12/2017 03:15 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 02/12/2017 10:56 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> It's probably safe to specify some range of higher numbered >>> ports: >>> >>> use-v4-udp-ports { range 10240 65535; }; use-v6-udp-ports { range >>> 10240 65535; }; >> >> But that

[CentOS] Unable to see Desktop folder and file

2017-02-15 Thread MOHD HOMAIDUR RAHMAN
Dear Cent OS User Today my Mendeley Reference Manager was crash. To recover freshly I deleted Mendeley file from my system from two place, 1) from share folder and 2) from cache folder by using this command. Copy from history 730 ls -a 731 cd .Mendeley\ Desktop/ 732 ls 733 ll 734

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/15/2017 12:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote: DHCPv6 is really unusual. IPv6 addressing and routing is set up almost entirely in the kernel, unless you're using static addresses. IPv6 is neither harder nor easier with NetworkManager, in my experience. It was my understanding that most ipv6 n

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Robert Nichols
On 02/15/2017 07:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/15/2017 07:34 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: Too much temptation to resist, I don't know which one of us is older but I have a feeling it's a "horse race". Like you, I still have a land line, WiFi is too slow and "WiFi security" seems to be an oxy

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, February 15, 2017 7:34 am, Leroy Tennison wrote: > Too much temptation to resist, I don't know which one of us is older but I > have a feeling it's a "horse race". Like you, I still have a land line, > WiFi is too slow and "WiFi security" seems to be an oxymoronic phrase. > Why people tex

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread m . roth
Robert Nichols wrote: > On 02/15/2017 07:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/15/2017 07:34 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: >>> Too much temptation to resist, I don't know which one of us is older >>> but I have a feeling it's a "horse race". Like you, I still have a >>> land line, WiFi is too slow and

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Warren, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 15:27 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > So you’ve now sprayed the heap on this system, but you can’t upload > anything else to it because noexec, so…now what? What has our > nefarious attacker gained? So the heap is set with data provided by the (local) attacker wh

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: My start with CentOS 7 to some extent reminded me this MacOS Server experience ;-) No, not ansence of documentation, but the attitude to make everybody use GUI. Exactly as you notice. I bet many users were lost by Linux then... Sometimes on this list

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/15/2017 09:37 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Warren, > > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 15:27 -0700, Warren Young wrote: >> So you’ve now sprayed the heap on this system, but you can’t upload >> anything else to it because noexec, so…now what? What has our >> nefarious attacker gained? >

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Johnny, On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:47 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > 2. They already have shell access on the machine in question and they > can already run anything in that shell that they can run via what you > are pointing out. No, assuming noexec /home mounts all they can run is system bi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/15/2017 09:45 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> My start with CentOS 7 to some extent reminded me this MacOS Server >> experience ;-) No, not ansence of documentation, but the attitude to make >> everybody use GUI. Exactly as you notice. I bet many use

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread m . roth
Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/15/2017 09:37 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 15:27 -0700, Warren Young wrote: >>> So you’ve now sprayed the heap on this system, but you can’t upload anything else to it because noexec, so…now what? What has our nefarious attacker gained? >>

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Leonard den Ottolander said: > On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:47 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > 2. They already have shell access on the machine in question and they > > can already run anything in that shell that they can run via what you > > are pointing out. > > No, assuming noex

Re: [CentOS] (re)build sssd-client.i686 for x86_64

2017-02-15 Thread Stijn De Weirdt
hi all, building with mock was pretty easy (esp easier then figuring out what build deps were required ;) anyway, for this specific case, following things needed to be taken in account: * do not copy all i686 rpms with the x86_64 ones in a single repo; was a huge mess. i ended up with same rpms t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:49 +, James Hogarth wrote: > On EL6 yes NM should be removed on anything but a wifi system but on > EL7 unless you fall into a specific edge case as per the network docs: > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html-single/Netwo

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, February 15, 2017 10:22 am, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Leonard den Ottolander said: >> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:47 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > 2. They already have shell access on the machine in question and they >> > can already run anything in that shell that they can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Always Learning
> Used a VCR or Cassette Player lately? My VCR broke. Replaced it with a DVD/HDD & USB3 unit. Replaced cassette player and tape recorders with broadcast quality handheld recorder DR-100mk3 and an amazingly good Sony PX440. Still retain the original functionality. C7 doesn't retain all the origin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Always Learning
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 20:40 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > Why the bleep can't stuff like this be simple KISS with simple > key=value > configuration files? Amen. Its incredibly simple to understand and doesn't require a doctorate in confused thinking ! -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. En

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread James Hogarth
On 15 Feb 2017 16:40, "Always Learning" wrote: On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:49 +, James Hogarth wrote: > On EL6 yes NM should be removed on anything but a wifi system but on > EL7 unless you fall into a specific edge case as per the network docs: > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread m . roth
Always Learning wrote: > >> Used a VCR or Cassette Player lately? > > My VCR broke. Replaced it with a DVD/HDD & USB3 unit. Replaced cassette > player and tape recorders with broadcast quality handheld recorder > DR-100mk3 and an amazingly good Sony PX440. But how do you play all your old VCR tape

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/15/2017 08:22 AM, Chris Adams wrote: noexec is not that big of a protection. On a normal CentOS system, you almost certainly have python installed (as well as likely other scripting languages such as perl), and they can be used to do just about anything compiled code can do. Exactly. S

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, February 15, 2017 11:45 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Always Learning wrote: >> >>> Used a VCR or Cassette Player lately? >> >> My VCR broke. Replaced it with a DVD/HDD & USB3 unit. Replaced cassette >> player and tape recorders with broadcast quality handheld recorder >> DR-100mk3 and an

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/15/2017 08:47 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: And yes, ALL user writable places (including often overlooked /dev/shm) are mounted with nosuid, nosgid, nodev, noexec options on servers where users are allowed to have shell. How sure are you? On the system I'm looking at right now, any user can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/15/2017 9:45 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: But how do you play all your old VCR tapes? As I said, I want to burn them to disk, but I still have a working VCR. ugh, the video quality of VHS is *so* nasty, I don't WANT to play those old tapes any more. I do have a still working Hi8 VCR I've

[CentOS] Kickstart - part ignore onpart ??

2017-02-15 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hello Guys, after hours of uncessfull create example before i forward special parition tests. part ignoe --onpart But Installation hang out for parition the harddisk. jump to another console partitions are ok ? Which line/lines is/are missing? Andy #version=DEVEL # System authorization in

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart - part ignore onpart ??

2017-02-15 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/15/2017 11:04 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: after hours of uncessfull create example before i forward special parition tests. part ignoe --onpart But Installation hang out for parition the harddisk. jump to another console partitions are ok ? There are an awful lot of typos in this email m

Re: [CentOS] mach64 driver, latest update in CentOS 6.8, symbol lookup error

2017-02-15 Thread Styma, Robert (Nokia - US)
Opened bug Bug 1422622 at RedHat Bugzilla. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer said: > Leonard, man... you've got let this go. Users with shell access > already have fairly broad permission to execute arbitrary code on > the system they log in to. The memory leak in pkcheck is *not* a > security issue. It's just a bug. Here's the other th

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Valeri Galtsev said: > Indeed, perl and often python are installed on most of servers I run. Not > considering myself security expert, I would like to ask: could you point > to some elevation of privileges exploit written in perl or python? All > I've seen were c/c++, but again I

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart - part ignore onpart ??

2017-02-15 Thread Andreas Benzler
I'm ill, i'm german ... the script is looks ok, copy from a slim installation of anaconda. Insert only the "pre part" and part/boot --onpart=/dev/sda1 part/ --onpart=/dev/sda2 partswap--onpart=/dev/sda3 As i wrote: Jump over to another console and the partitions are t

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, February 15, 2017 1:29 pm, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Valeri Galtsev said: >> Indeed, perl and often python are installed on most of servers I run. >> Not >> considering myself security expert, I would like to ask: could you point >> to some elevation of privileges exploit wri

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, February 15, 2017 12:23 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/15/2017 08:47 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> And yes, ALL user writable places (including often overlooked /dev/shm) >> are mounted with nosuid, nosgid, nodev, noexec options on servers where >> users are allowed to have shell. > > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

2017-02-15 Thread Always Learning
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 12:45 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Always Learning wrote: > > > >> Used a VCR or Cassette Player lately? > > > > My VCR broke. Replaced it with a DVD/HDD & USB3 unit. Replaced cassette > > player and tape recorders with broadcast quality handheld recorder > > DR-100mk3 a

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/15/2017 12:08 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: /run/screen/S- - NOT on CentOS 5 /var/spool/samba - NOT on CentOS 5 that needs extra security - in our shop; To be pedantic: screen definitely creates a user-writable directory on CentOS 5, in a different location, and samba will include that dire

Re: [CentOS] mach64 driver, latest update in CentOS 6.8, symbol lookup error

2017-02-15 Thread Andreas Benzler
So the rebuilt not work? Sincerely Andy Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2017, 17:26 + schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia - US): > 1422622 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Problems with latest Firefox update -- can't install new extensions

2017-02-15 Thread Kay Schenk
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/12/2017 03:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > Since the latest Firefox update to 45.7.0 on my CentOS 6.8 system, I can > > no longer install add-ons/extensions. Things LOOK like they're working > > but the extensions don't get stored in my n

[CentOS] About the flash-plugin

2017-02-15 Thread m . roth
Y'all may remember I posted here weeks ago, that flash-plugin was crashing. There was an update this morning, which I did on my workstation... and it hasn't crashed all day on either of the two radio stations who I listen to via streaming media. mark

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart - part ignore onpart ?? sovled, but not enough place for core.img grub2

2017-02-15 Thread Andreas Benzler
Terrible me of understand how that works ... But: not enough place on sda for core.img if you are using grub2 ??? I bump boot to 500MB, help nothing. Try another filesystem same error. "Sometimes you must be the developer to understand the program." now it looks like #version=DEVE

Re: [CentOS] mach64 driver, latest update in CentOS 6.8, symbol lookup error

2017-02-15 Thread Styma, Robert (Nokia - US)
Hi Andy, I tried it but got the same error. I am pretty sure I got the correct copy of the driver as can be seen in the log. Interesting note, when rhgb was on during boot, the word CentOS 6.8 at the bottom right of the screen was orange instead of white. I wonder if the kernel was aware of

Re: [CentOS] Serious attack vector on pkcheck ignored by Red Hat

2017-02-15 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, February 15, 2017 2:38 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/15/2017 12:08 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> /run/screen/S- - NOT on CentOS 5 >> /var/spool/samba - NOT on CentOS 5 that needs extra security - in our shop; > > > To be pedantic: screen definitely creates a user-writable directory on Ce

[CentOS] Centos7 GeoIP support with BIND

2017-02-15 Thread Robert Moskowitz
In my new Centos7 BIND DNS server, I am seeing messages in logwatch about GeoIP. Something new for me to learn about, and it seems, configure. Checking to see what packages are available I find: GeoIP.armv7hl 1.5.0-11.el7 @centos-base_rbf GeoIP-data.noarch

Re: [CentOS] Centos7 GeoIP support with BIND

2017-02-15 Thread Istimsak Abdulbasir
On Feb 15, 2017 11:11 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: In my new Centos7 BIND DNS server, I am seeing messages in logwatch about GeoIP. Something new for me to learn about, and it seems, configure. Checking to see what packages are available I find: GeoIP.armv7hl 1.5.0-1