Hello All
After recent system upgrade (this night) i lost access to two servers
through SSH, because of change in SELinux policy - i have ssh there on
different port and now it's gone.
Thanks to puppet i was able to change SSH port back to default and log
in, but is this expected behavior? I thou
On 19/01/17 09:43, Marcin Trendota wrote:
> Hello All
>
> After recent system upgrade (this night) i lost access to two servers
> through SSH, because of change in SELinux policy - i have ssh there on
> different port and now it's gone.
>
> Thanks to puppet i was able to change SSH port back to d
I have experienced this myself. It is very upsetting.
(Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for any spelling or
grammatical errors.)
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:57 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>
> log
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
W dniu 19.01.2017 o 10:17, Hal Wigoda pisze:
> I have experienced this myself. It is very upsetting.
It happened on servers with docker installed. I got error message there:
# semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp
Re-declaration of type docker_t
Failed to create node
Bad type declaration at
Hello,
I changed ISPs a few weeks ago and now I'm on cable. In doing so, I lost
the ability to use the DSL as a FAX line.
So, I bought an OOMA. Turns out it uses a number of ports, three of which
are reserved, 53 TCP/UDP, 110 TCP and 443 TCP. These ports have already been
port forwarded from my
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of TE Dukes
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 7:41 AM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP
>
> So, I bought an OOMA. Turns out it uses a number of ports, three of which
> are reserved,
On 01/19/2017 04:47 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote:
> W dniu 19.01.2017 o 10:17, Hal Wigoda pisze:
>> I have experienced this myself. It is very upsetting.
>
>
> It happened on servers with docker installed. I got error message there:
> # semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp
> Re-declaration of
W dniu 19.01.2017 o 14:54, Johnny Hughes pisze:
>> So, it looks like something with docker-selinux and container-selinux...
> Right, I wanted to mention that docker-selinux was replaced with
> container-selinux in the lasest version.
Shouldn't be docker-selinux automatically removed then?
--
Ov
Hello Gordon,
Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 11:52:35 PM, you wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 05:34 AM, Subscriber wrote:
>> Someone noticed something similar?
> How is your storage arranged,
It is software RAID1 + LVM
> and what kind of IO patterns do those VMs
> have?
Do not quite understand. What do
On Wednesday 18 January 2017 15:09:49 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Wed, January 18, 2017 4:24 am, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> > You could say the same thing about computers in general:
> > I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of
> > the
> > market!.
>
> And they suck.
Hello Gianluca,
Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 3:54:15 PM, you wrote:
> In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some
> collected statistics from sysstat/sar.
> Look at the sarXX files under /var/log/sa. They should be kept for 30 day
> by default in CentOS 7.
Unfortunately,
On 01/19/2017 12:43 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote:
After recent system upgrade (this night) i lost access to two servers
through SSH, because of change in SELinux policy - i have ssh there on
different port and now it's gone.
Which release? I also run ssh on an alternate port on one host, and
tha
On 01/19/2017 06:29 AM, Subscriber wrote:
and what kind of IO patterns do those VMs
have?
Do not quite understand. What do you mean?
What at the VMs doing? Are they entirely idle? Are they doing light
work, mostly reading from disks? If they're not generating disk IO,
then that's not rel
Hello Subscriber,
Thursday, January 19, 2017, 4:44:04 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Gianluca,
> Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 3:54:15 PM, you wrote:
>> In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some
>> collected statistics from sysstat/sar.
>> Look at the sarXX files under /var/log
On 01/19/2017 06:54 AM, Subscriber wrote:
But I collect such statistics in Zabbix. And the numbers and graphs
indicate an increase in the load on the CPU (ie System time).
"load" has another meaning in the context of POSIX system performance
counters. I'm pretty sure you're talking about
Hello Gordon,
Thursday, January 19, 2017, 5:09:29 PM, you wrote:
> On 01/19/2017 06:54 AM, Subscriber wrote:
>> But I collect such statistics in Zabbix. And the numbers and graphs
>> indicate an increase in the load on the CPU (ie System time).
> "load" has another meaning in the context of
Subscriber wrote:
> Hello Gianluca,
>
> Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 3:54:15 PM, you wrote:
>
>> In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some
>> collected statistics from sysstat/sar.
>> Look at the sarXX files under /var/log/sa. They should be kept for 30
>> day
>> by defaul
On 01/19/2017 08:57 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote:
> W dniu 19.01.2017 o 14:54, Johnny Hughes pisze:
>
>>> So, it looks like something with docker-selinux and container-selinux...
>> Right, I wanted to mention that docker-selinux was replaced with
>> container-selinux in the lasest version.
> Shouldn
Hello Gordon,
Thursday, January 19, 2017, 4:57:48 PM, you wrote:
> On 01/19/2017 06:29 AM, Subscriber wrote:
>>> and what kind of IO patterns do those VMs
>>> have?
>> Do not quite understand. What do you mean?
>>
> What at the VMs doing?
Its gateway from local network to Internet
> Are they e
Hello m,
Thursday, January 19, 2017, 5:17:48 PM, you wrote:
>>> In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some
>>> collected statistics from sysstat/sar.
>>> Look at the sarXX files under /var/log/sa. They should be kept for 30
>>> day
>>> by default in CentOS 7.
>>
>> Unfort
On 1/19/2017 4:41 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
I lost
the ability to use the DSL as a FAX line.
Analog traditional FAX may not work very well over VOIP.Just sayin'.
So, I bought an OOMA. Turns out it uses a number of ports, three of which
are reserved, 53 TCP/UDP, 110 TCP and 443 TCP. These ports
-Original Message-
From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:01 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP
On 1/19/2017 4:41 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
> I lost
> the ability to use the DSL as a FAX line.
Analog
What is the best way to specify which mirrors off a repository you want to
use? Have a host with rather restricted egress rules and want to allow it
to reach a couple of mirrors for each repo it needs. And, yes, I am not
ready to mirror them locally.
___
On 1/19/2017 1:57 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
What is the best way to specify which mirrors off a repository you want to
use? Have a host with rather restricted egress rules and want to allow it
to reach a couple of mirrors for each repo it needs. And, yes, I am not
ready to mirror them locally.
Well, got hit by this too. Ironically, I don't use docker, I think I had it
installed being pulled in for something else.
So, tried the yum remove docker* but no go. When I do semanage port -a -t
ssh_port_t -p tcp I get an error
Bad type declaration at /etc/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/doc
Anyone familiar with the selinux policy for the
amanda backup software package? I'm getting lots
of data not being backed up. For example, under
/home there are 2 directory trees owned by root.
Those get backed up, user home dirs do not.
No AVC denials nor messages in /var/log/messages
or journa
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of TE Dukes
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 2:03 PM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
27 matches
Mail list logo
