On 12/19/2016 12:41 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
>> geo.inbox.ignored
>> Sent: den 16 december 2016 15:03
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list
>> On 12/16/2016 07:29
Hi, Leonard,
On 12/18/16 12:47, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 11:56 -0500, mark wrote:
This is odd. Just recently, at home, even though I have it set to display
messages as plain text, I'm suddenly seeing pics attached to spam inline, as
though I had it set to display
hi everyone
just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages?
regards,
L.
___
CentOS mailing list
Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.
Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three
times. That comes to it being usable for about five minutes before it
crashes.
Anyone else getting this?
__
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:50:54PM -0800, whitivery wrote:
> It is a system with several servers (various platforms/distros).
>
> One piece of software runs on all of the servers. For it to operate
> correctly, the instance on one server (prime) must start before the others
> (auxiliary).
>
> So
Still trying to get it running. Updated CentOS 7, ATI video card, trying
to use the radeon driver, and, using the previous kernel, X appears to
come up, but gdm fails; with the 514 kernel, X fails to start.
And here's a twist: I just rebooted, with radeon.modeset=1 on the kernel
line... and for no
On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote:
Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.
Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three
times. That comes to it being usable for about five minutes before it
crashes.
Anyone else getting this?
For what it
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is available.
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
Hello,
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote:
> > Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. >
> > Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three >
> > times. That comes to it being usable fo
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Still trying to get it running. Updated CentOS 7, ATI video card, trying
> to use the radeon driver, and, using the previous kernel, X appears to
> come up, but gdm fails; with the 514 kernel, X fails to start.
>
> And here's a twist: I just rebooted, with radeon.modeset=1
On Mon, December 19, 2016 12:41 am, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
>> geo.inbox.ignored
>> Sent: den 16 december 2016 15:03
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list
>>
>>
>>
>>
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more
packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is available.
somewhere (semi)officially? wh
On 19/12/16 16:38, lejeczek wrote:
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more
packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is avail
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more
packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is available.
devtoolset-6-runtime is missing
Hey Mark,
never got this hard problems.
But:
Radeon HD 8570 / R7 240/340 OEM
OEM Cards sometimes needs a hack to be running on offical fglrx driver.
Did it in the past on some HP rebranded ATI cards.
can you send lspcik, mine looks like
-
On 12/19/2016 11:13 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote:
Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. > Fired it up
this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three > times. That com
On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote:
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is avai
Hi.
We wish to install rh-git29 from the Software Collections repo and it's
failing because of a missing rh-git29-git package.
It appears to be absent still on the latest Centos 7.3. distro.
[root@localhost ~]# yum install rh-git29
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, priorities
551
Hi Centos Team,
It seems this is partially resolved. The issue now is that
rh-git29-runtime cannot be found by yum but the package itself is in the
repo directory:
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/rh-git29/rh-git29-runtime-2.3-4.el7.x86_64.rpm
[root@ldas-p
ken wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 11:13 AM, wwp wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote:
Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.
> Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed
three
I have a number of machines using Centos 6.8
They have M-Audio sound cards.
When I set the output levels using alsamixer and save using 'alsactrl
store' [creating a requested directory] the settings do not restore on
reboot.
I have no idea why they don't.
running 'alsactrl restore' works so th
I wanted to pass this along. I'm sure it may be nothing new to most of you,
but it has greatly reduced sasl attacks and spam.
I found most of it here:
https://scottlinux.com/2011/05/26/prevent-postfix-brute-force/
I added the fail2ban rule and modified my postfix main.cf as follows:
smtpd_client
After running a long series of benchmarks, it looks like there is a very
significant performance difference between systems using LVM and systems
not using LVM under CentOS 7. I'd appreciate it if anyone else can
confirm these results.
There are a couple of other surprising aspects of the res
I just tried a kickstart setup for the first time since 7.3 and got an
error similar to the error in this unresolved Fedora bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278260
Has anyone successfully done a kickstart setup using 7.3 on x86_64? I'd
imagine this is part of QA, so th
> I just tried a kickstart setup for the first time since 7.3 and got an
> error similar to the error in this unresolved Fedora bug report:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278260
>
> Has anyone successfully done a kickstart setup using 7.3 on x86_64?
I have with an http based ks
25 matches
Mail list logo
