hi there.
The new update for links in EPEL takes it from 2.8-2 to 2.13-1. But
yum includes 21 xWindows dependencies that weren't required before.
I'd rather not install them - it's a headless server. Was this intentional?
===
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
>>> Larry Martell wrote:
We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously.
We
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
> Hi Matt-
>
> Thank you for this very detailed and thoughtful reply.
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Larry Martell
>> wrote:
>>> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS se
Il 21/10/2016 17:20, m.r...@5-cent.us ha scritto:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/21/2016 2:03 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
My ssds are failing?
SSD's wear out based on writes per block. they distribute those
writes, but once each block has been written X number of times, they are
no longer reli
Hello Richard,
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 03:39 -0400, Richard Beels wrote:
> The new update for links in EPEL takes it from 2.8-2 to 2.13-1. But
> yum includes 21 xWindows dependencies that weren't required before.
>
> I'd rather not install them - it's a headless server. Was this intentional?
Ve
On 10/24/16 03:52, Larry Martell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, wrote:
Larry Martell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
Larry Martell wrote:
We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
external machines that FTP files to this server fairly
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
> SMART Error Log not supported
I reckon there's a between those lines. The line right after the
first should read something like:
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
On 10/24/2016 04:51 AM, mark wrote:
Absolutely add nobarrier, and see what happens.
Using "nobarrier" might increase overall write throughput, but it
removes an important integrity feature, increasing the risk of
filesystem corruption on power loss. I wouldn't recommend doing that
unless y
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 10/24/2016 04:51 AM, mark wrote:
>> Absolutely add nobarrier, and see what happens.
>
> Using "nobarrier" might increase overall write throughput, but it
> removes an important integrity feature, increasing the risk of
> filesystem corruption on power loss. I wouldn't re
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Dear All,
I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this:
https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/
At least those of
Hi folks,
normally I have not so much to do with SElinux but I expected to get in touch
sooner or later :-)
I migrated a backup-system from El5 to EL6 and the rsync backup process is
complaining about selinux attr's now.
client <-> server (fetches via rsync -aHAX)
client# sestatus
SELinux s
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
>> To be clear: the python script is moving files on the same NFS file
>> system? E.g., something like
>>
>> mv /mnt/nfs-server/dir1/file /mnt/nfs-server/dir2/file
>>
>> where /mnt/nfs-server is the mount point of the NFS server on the
>>
Is there a good source of information about how Linux distributions
and installers identify and interact with the hardware devices in
a system? We are particularly interested in the shutdown process
that leads to complete power-off. Thanks.
___
CentOS
Chris Olson wrote:
> Is there a good source of information about how Linux distributions
> and installers identify and interact with the hardware devices in
> a system? We are particularly interested in the shutdown process
> that leads to complete power-off. Thanks.
You mean something more than
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Larry Martell
> wrote:
>>> To be clear: the python script is moving files on the same NFS file
>>> system? E.g., something like
>>>
>>> mv /mnt/nfs-server/dir1/file /mnt/nfs-server/dir2/file
>>>
>>> where
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
>> At any rate, what I was looking at was seeing if there was any way to
>> simplify this process, and cut NFS out of the picture. If you need
>> only to push these files around, what about rsync?
>
> It's not just moving files around. The fil
Good afternoon
Best regard
I'm having trouble with a CentOS server release 5.10, so that my users
connect via VPN Intranet type, I could not find a solution, if I can
collaborate appreciate them, attached logs when it worked and now.
Log running:
Mon Oct 10 13:50:02 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Re-us
On 10/24/2016 07:29 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As I noted in my original repost, that it needs to be on a UPS
Ah. I see that now. Still, may I suggest that whenever we recommend
remedies that eliminate reliability measures, such as mounting with
"nobarrier", we also repeat caveats so that
Another alternative idea: you probably won't be comfortable with this,
but check out systemd-nspawn. There are lots of examples online, and
even I wrote about how I use it:
http://raw-sewage.net/articles/fedora-under-centos/
This is unfortunately another "sysadmin" solution to your problem.
n
On 10/24/2016 09:53 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Any suggestions to avoid the default labeling
"unconfined_u:object_r:locale_t:s0"?
Not off the top of my head. I think you need to either a) not try to
preserve the labels or b) run the backup as a user which can manage
labels. What is the rsync
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Larry Martell
> wrote:
>>> At any rate, what I was looking at was seeing if there was any way to
>>> simplify this process, and cut NFS out of the picture. If you need
>>> only to push these files around, wha
Am 24.10.2016 um 23:44 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
> On 10/24/2016 09:53 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Any suggestions to avoid the default labeling
>> "unconfined_u:object_r:locale_t:s0"?
>
>
> Not off the top of my head. I think you need to either a) not try to
> preserve the labels or b) run the
Am 24.10.2016 um 23:38 schrieb Macmor Mach :
> I'm having trouble with a CentOS server release 5.10, so that my users
> connect via VPN Intranet type, I could not find a solution, if I can
> collaborate appreciate them, attached logs when it worked and now.
>
> Log running:
>
> Mon Oct 10 13:50:0
> Is there a good source of information about how Linux distributions and
> installers identify
> and interact with the hardware devices in a system? We are particularly
> interested in the
> shutdown process that leads to complete power-off. Thanks.
None other I assume than from the horse's m
24 matches
Mail list logo
