Hi,
I found gstreamer offcial have just announced 1.8.2 version.
("gstreamer.freedesktop.org")
But centos 6 only support gstreamer 0.10. When will centos 6 support gstreamer
1.8?
Thanks!
Regards
Andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On 06/30/2016 09:46 AM, qw wrote:
Hi,
I found gstreamer offcial have just announced 1.8.2 version.
("gstreamer.freedesktop.org")
But centos 6 only support gstreamer 0.10. When will centos 6 support gstreamer
1.8?
When rhel6 does. That means: probably never.
On 06/28/2016 12:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 12:17 PM, Peter Q. wrote:
>> Hi there, I was reading about it.
>> https://www.redhat.com/en/about/blog/net-core-now-available-and-supported-red-hat-enterprise-linux-and-red-hat-openshift
>>
>> What will happen with Centos and .NET?
>> In
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
>
> By putting these rules first, before the "ESTABLISHED,RELATED" rule, you're
> applying additional processing (CPU time) to the vast majority of your
> packets for no reason. The "E,R" rule should be first. It won't match the
> invalid pa
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:02:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:13:35PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> Fred Smith wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fr
On 30/06/16 18:49, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
By putting these rules first, before the "ESTABLISHED,RELATED" rule, you're
applying additional processing (CPU time) to the vast majority of your
packets for no reason. The "E,R" rule should be first. It
I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here
know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger
than 2TB?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here
> know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger
> than 2TB?
>
One way to find out is to plug 4TB drive and take a look. Another is to
ask one wh
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here
>> know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger
>> than 2TB?
>
> One way to find out is to plug 4TB drive and take a l
Ned,
Thank you very much for the response.
Great example following through on the premise.
It sounds like I need to have a better understanding of the traffic
patterns on my network to know the optimal order for iptables
filtering rules.
My brief example -
Premise: I want to limit outsiders fro
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:46:49PM +0800, qw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found gstreamer offcial have just announced 1.8.2 version.
> ("gstreamer.freedesktop.org")
>
> But centos 6 only support gstreamer 0.10. When will centos 6 support
> gstreamer 1.8?
>
I've no idea, but my centos7 system has both
g
On Thu, June 30, 2016 4:38 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here
>>> know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger
>>> than
Hi,
I'm trying to build gstreamer sdk on centos 6.7. When configure is run for
'gstreamer-1.8.2.tar.xz' on centos 6.7, error messages are reported as below:
checking for GLIB... no
configure: Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.40.0' but version of GLib is 2.28.8
configure: error: This package requires GLi
On 30/06/16 23:19, Mike wrote:
Ned,
Thank you very much for the response.
Great example following through on the premise.
It sounds like I need to have a better understanding of the traffic
patterns on my network to know the optimal order for iptables
filtering rules.
Try running:
iptables
Dear Community
I hope you are all doing well.
Recently I have been receiving several complaints from our service
provider. Please see the complaint below:
A public-facing device on your network, running on IP address
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, operates a RPC port mapping service responding on UDP port
11
Are you really exposing portmapper (RPC) and NFS to public network?
Eero
2016-07-01 9:38 GMT+03:00 Leon Vergottini :
> Dear Community
>
> I hope you are all doing well.
>
> Recently I have been receiving several complaints from our service
> provider. Please see the complaint below:
>
> A publi
16 matches
Mail list logo