[CentOS] problem i didn't seeing list file new on centos

2016-06-18 Thread alireza baghery
hi i have two server *CentOS 6.5* and *CentOS 5.9 * i have one *SAN Storage* on both servers but when i create file one of server (example Centos 6.5) Other Sever (Centos 5.9) do not see file and i must *umount* Disk to seeing files new how solve this problem format disk *EXT3* Tnx

Re: [CentOS] problem i didn't seeing list file new on centos

2016-06-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 6/18/2016 12:09 AM, alireza baghery wrote: i have two server *CentOS 6.5* and *CentOS 5.9 * i have one*SAN Storage* on both servers but when i create file one of server (example Centos 6.5) Other Sever (Centos 5.9) do not see file and i must*umount* Disk to seeing files new how solve this pr

Re: [CentOS] yum "Requires" yum-plugin-fastestmirror; why?

2016-06-18 Thread Ned Slider
On 17/06/16 20:04, Warren Young wrote: In another recent thread,[1] someone was having trouble with the yum-plugin-fastestmirror feature, so I suggested he remove it, since it’s just a plugin and should therefore be optional. He reported that it couldn’t be removed due to package dependenci

Re: [CentOS] yum "Requires" yum-plugin-fastestmirror; why?

2016-06-18 Thread Walter H.
On 18.06.2016 12:39, Ned Slider wrote: On 17/06/16 20:04, Warren Young wrote: In another recent thread,[1] someone was having trouble with the yum-plugin-fastestmirror feature, so I suggested he remove it, since it’s just a plugin and should therefore be optional. He reported that it couldn

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 15:56 +0100, Michael H wrote: > On 17/06/16 15:46, James B. Byrne wrote: > > > > We operate a private CA for our domain and have since 2005. We > > maintain a public CRL strictly in accordance with our CPS and have our > > own OID assigned. Our CPS and CRL together with

[CentOS] CentOS Virtual Machine System Time

2016-06-18 Thread Chris Olson
We run several CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 systems as virtual machines using VirtualBox on Windows 7.  Most of these systems have continuous up time. The Windows 7 foundation platforms have no difficulty keeping accurate system time unless they are shut down for some reason, which is rare in our environm

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, June 18, 2016 7:52 am, Always Learning wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 15:56 +0100, Michael H wrote: > >> On 17/06/16 15:46, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> > >> > We operate a private CA for our domain and have since 2005. We >> > maintain a public CRL strictly in accordance with our CPS and

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Walter H.
On 18.06.2016 03:41, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 06/17/2016 07:56 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: On Thu, June 16, 2016 14:09, Gordon Messmer wrote: I doubt that most users check the dates on SSL certificates, unless they are familiar enough with TLS to understand that a shorter validity period is bette

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 08:20 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, June 18, 2016 7:52 am, Always Learning wrote: > > > > Your connection is not secure > > > > The owner of harte-lyne.ca has configured their website improperly. To > > protect your information from being stolen, Firefox has not co

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Virtual Machine System Time

2016-06-18 Thread Walter H.
On 18.06.2016 14:54, Chris Olson wrote: We run several CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 systems as virtual machines using VirtualBox on Windows 7. a similar setup as mine; I use VMware; have you installed and configured ntp? does virtualbox provide some package for Linux, that optimizes the usage as virt

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Virtual Machine System Time

2016-06-18 Thread Александр Кириллов
Is this a common time problem when running CentOS as a virtual machine? Any suggestions regarding the cause if this problem and how to keep the CentOS system time locked to the host platform time would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks. Have you installed VBox Guest Additions? These will sync gues

Re: [CentOS] problem i didn't seeing list file new on centos

2016-06-18 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 11:39 +0430, alireza baghery wrote: > hi > i have two server *CentOS 6.5* and > *CentOS 5.9 * You may wish to update your Centos to the latest versions:- Centos 5.11 Centos 6.8 -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. _

Re: [CentOS] yum timeout ... (CentOS 6.8)

2016-06-18 Thread Walter H.
On 16.06.2016 22:12, Warren Young wrote: On Jun 16, 2016, at 1:04 PM, Walter H. wrote: You can just remove the plugin: yum remove yum-fastestmirror not really [root@host /]# yum remove yum-fastestmirror ... Error: Trying to remove "yum", which is protected That’s annoying. I’ve filed a b

[CentOS] Centos update 6.8 to 7

2016-06-18 Thread Bachir Bachir
 I downloaded Centos 7 and i want to update from local usb i created using dd if=cenots7 of=/dev/sdc i dont want to reinstall, i need just to update.What would be the best way to do so pleaseThanks muchBachir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org ht

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread James B. Byrne
On Fri, June 17, 2016 11:06, Walter H. wrote: > On 17.06.2016 16:46, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: >>> On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: but it also affects the other public CAs: you can’t get a publicly-trusted cert for a machine witho

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: https and self signed]

2016-06-18 Thread James B. Byrne
On Fri, June 17, 2016 13:08, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > We do not expire accounts until the person leaves the Department > and grace period passes. Then we do lock account and after some > time person's files are being deleted. This is the policy, and > this is what we do. The only time when accou

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/18/2016 02:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: On Fri, June 17, 2016 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote: https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support of your own is not evidence in the sense I understand the word to mean. I'm

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: https and self signed]

2016-06-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, June 18, 2016 5:20 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Fri, June 17, 2016 13:08, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> >> We do not expire accounts until the person leaves the Department >> and grace period passes. Then we do lock account and after some >> time person's files are being deleted. This is

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:39 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. > This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's > foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). The same Mozilla Founda

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, June 18, 2016 6:50 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:39 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. >> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's >> foremost experts in the field (

Re: [CentOS] Centos update 6.8 to 7

2016-06-18 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Jun 18, 2016, at 5:50 PM, Bachir Bachir wrote: > I downloaded Centos 7 and i want to update from local usb i created using dd > if=cenots7 of=/dev/sdc i dont want to reinstall, i need just to update.What > would be the best way to do so pleaseThanks muchBachir There is no supported mechanis

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

2016-06-18 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 19:49 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Which browser do you use? I still am in a process of finding replacement > for Firefox (the closest is midori, it doesn't fully fill the bill for me > though). There is a Mozilla folk called Palemoon by some Europeans (Sweeds, I think)

Re: [CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

2016-06-18 Thread Anthony K
On 16/06/16 13:18, Johnny Hughes wrote: .. the actual definition of a 'CRITICAL' update from Red Hat's perspective is: "This rating is given to flaws that could be easily*exploited by a remote unauthenticated attacker and lead to system compromise (arbitrary code execution) without requiring