Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Pouar wrote: > I'm pretty sure that's a variant of the Almquist Shell You would be correct. All of the BSDs and some GNU/Linux distributions use Almquist for sh if not using a symlink to bash or dash. In fact, the first release of Slackware in 1993 had sh as a sy

Re: [CentOS] Apache logs missing

It looks like logrotate changed behaviour and started to delete old logs instead of compressing them. As you can see it just wiped away the one from 20160327, and that with all configs on default. Does someone know how to fix this?? -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 357256 Dec 14 03:15 ssl_access_log-2015

Re: [CentOS] Apache logs missing

Adrian Jenzer писал 2016-04-28 11:04: It looks like logrotate changed behaviour and started to delete old logs instead of compressing them. As you can see it just wiped away the one from 20160327, and that with all configs on default. Does someone know how to fix this?? https://bugzilla.redhat.

[CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

I don’t know what’s going on the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!! Fresh installation. packet_write_wait: Connection How can that be! Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

what is wrong with the default sshd server. after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts grrr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On 4/28/2016 1:57 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!! huh. spill chuck gone a rye ? -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/l

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On 28 Apr 2016 10:58, "Andreas Benzler" wrote: > > I don’t know what’s going on > > the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!! > > Fresh installation. > > packet_write_wait: Connection > > How can that be! > > Andy > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > Ce

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh 141.52.135.21 @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdro

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: what is wrong with the default sshd server. after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never had any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

This never happen to me, first time too. This was never happen when i drive the machine with the usb drive installation of centos, same state. As I said: Fresh from yesterday. Greetings Andy > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:11 schrieb John R Pierce : > > On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >>

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On 4/28/2016 2:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1.8 debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1.8 pat OpenSSH_5* compat 0x0c00 thats not CentOS. are

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce" wrote: > > On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> >> what is wrong with the default sshd server. >> >> after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts > > > I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never had any i

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

sure > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez : > > On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce" wrote: >> >> On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >>> >>> what is wrong with the default sshd server. >>> >>> after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts >> >> >> I've

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On 28 Apr 2016 11:24, "Andreas Benzler" wrote: > > sure > > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez : > > > > On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce" wrote: > >> > >> On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > >>> > >>> what is wrong with the default sshd server. > >>> > >>> after retry t

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

Same machine iMac for the last two weeks. Can work on virtual box Centos 7 Usb drive installation Centos 7 works Fresh installation not on this laptop. > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Earl A Ramirez : > > On 28 Apr 2016 11:24, "Andreas Benzler" wrote: >> >> sure >>> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 s

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 15:39 -0700, JJB wrote: > On 04/27/16 15:18, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, JJB said: > >> Interesting. Back in 1980 we called /bin/sh the Mashey shell. It > >> did not have command substitution or other things we now take for > >> granted. Bourne did that for us

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 15

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ.

[CentOS] systemctl enable httpd failure

Hi List, [root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable httpd Failed to execute operation: Invalid argument I can disable and re-enable other services without issue, I'm also seeing the same error when I run [root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable mailman Failed to execute operation: Invalid argument Any suggestion

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

Thank you, Andreas and Valeri for your replies. Brian Bernard On Apr 28, 2016 2:41 AM, "Andreas Benzler" wrote: > > Hello Brain, > > for such new software you go with Centos 7. The older version is more rocket stable, > but in case you use such new laptop the newer one is the better / best choic

Re: [CentOS] systemctl enable httpd failure

On 28/04/16 13:29, Michael H wrote: > Hi List, > > [root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable httpd > Failed to execute operation: Invalid argument > > I can disable and re-enable other services without issue, I'm also > seeing the same error when I run > > [root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable mailman > Faile

[CentOS] About mysql upgrade

Hi, I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of mysql-server rpm. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

On Thu, April 28, 2016 1:40 am, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hello Brain, > > for such new software you go with Centos 7. The older version is more > rocket stable, > but in case you use such new laptop the newer one is the better / best > choice. > > You need to upgrade the kernel, there is no way o

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

Johnny Hughes writes: [...] > I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a > couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on > https://ci.centos.org/ Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon download problem that has plagued every new upda

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

correct my self: I know how to package rpm and patch files. Sometimes i develop. The question is what you wanne do. When your machine works with centos 7 got a lifecycle till 2024. Sincerely Andy Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2016, 22:27 -0400 schrieb Brian Bernard: > Hi all, > > I'm looking at buying

Re: [CentOS] system-config-printer samba broken

Ok got it work without realm (domain/workgroup) inside the url and "DOMAIN//USER" - Domain must be in highletter. Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2016, 18:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler: > Hello guys… > > while i was working with special printer setup fallow problems are there: > > samba: > 1. system-c

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted earlier, it tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it: > > Add correct host key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this > message. > Offen

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:48:11AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, April 28, 2016 1:40 am, Andreas Benzler wrote: > > Don’t flame me - Ubuntu LTS 16.04 is on the way and this should work for > > you. > > Ubuntu is clone of Debian. Don't flame me, I'm just mentioning. I'm surprised that n

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com wrote: > The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the > computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted earlier, > it > tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it: > >> >> Add correct host k

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

I know how todo. I try it out tomorrow. But it’s the first time with this kind of problem with a fresh installed centos 7. Thanks Valeri. > Am 28.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb Valeri Galtsev : > > > On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com > wrote: >> The

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com wrote: >> The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the >> computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted earlier, >> it tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it:

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On Thu, April 28, 2016 9:25 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com wrote: >>> The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the >>> computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted >>> earlier,

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

On Thu, April 28, 2016 9:07 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:48:11AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Thu, April 28, 2016 1:40 am, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> > Don’t flame me - Ubuntu LTS 16.04 is on the way and this should work >> for >> > you. >> >> Ubuntu is clone of

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On Thu, April 28, 2016 4:04 am, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/28/2016 1:57 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!! > > huh. spill chuck gone a rye ? > Thank you, John! You made my day! Valeri > > -- > john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz > >

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of mysql-server rpm. Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset (PostgreSQL 6.5), early in my time as RPM mainta

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On 04/28/2016 02:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21 ... debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 write: Broken pipe ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21 ... debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent ssh_packet_read: Connection re

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

Lamar Owen wrote: > On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run >> mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of >> mysql-server rpm. > Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset (PostgreSQL 6.5), ea

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On Thu, April 28, 2016 11:25 am, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/28/2016 02:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21 > ... >> debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 >> write: Broken pipe >> ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21 > ...

[CentOS] DNSSEC deployment stats

Since it was discussed earlier, I thought some might find this link interesting : http://secspider.verisignlabs.com/stats.html It is a spider that crawls DNS servers counting both DNSSEC and TLSA records. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org ht

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

On 28.04.2016 17:58, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run >> mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of >> mysql-server rpm. > Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

Thanks folks, Really convincing answers! 2016-04-28 13:53 GMT-03:00 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : > On 28.04.2016 17:58, Lamar Owen wrote: > > On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run > >> mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a s

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

On Apr 28, 2016 7:46 AM, "Sergio Belkin" wrote: > > Hi, > > > I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run > mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of > mysql-server rpm. > > Thanks in advance > > -- > -- > Sergio Belkin > LPIC-2 Certified - http:

[CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

Hi! I'm currently using a non-CentOS system, and wondering where I can find the GPG keys so I can verify the checksum file? The page on the website (https://www.centos.org/keys/) only give information where I can find them on an already installed system. Regards, Albin _

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

repository gpg can be found in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ read the repo file(s) in /etc/yum.repos.d/ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo # CentOS-Base.repo # # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the # update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to and

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

On 04/28/2016 11:50 AM, Albin Otterhäll wrote: > Hi! > > I'm currently using a non-CentOS system, and wondering where I can find > the GPG keys so I can verify the checksum file? > > The page on the website (https://www.centos.org/keys/) only give > information where I can find them on an already

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

On 2016-04-28 21:08, Andreas Benzler wrote: > repository gpg can be found in > /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ > > read the repo file(s) in > > /etc/yum.repos.d/ > > cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo > # CentOS-Base.repo > # > # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the > #

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

On 2016-04-28 21:24, Thomas Eriksson wrote: > On 04/28/2016 11:50 AM, Albin Otterhäll wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'm currently using a non-CentOS system, and wondering where I can find >> the GPG keys so I can verify the checksum file? >> >> The page on the website (https://www.centos.org/keys/) only give

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

On 04/28/2016 02:29 PM, Albin Otterhäll wrote: Apparently I wasn't clear enough. I'm using Arch Linux (i.e. I haven't access to the gpg key that comes with an installation) and would like to verify the ISO I've downloaded. To-do that I need the key used to sign the "sha256sum.txt.asc" file. I n

[CentOS] useradd -r doesn't work right in some contexts

"useradd -r testuser" run as root from an interactive ssh session does the right thing: it creates a user account with a UID in the system users range (< 400). Running the same command as a cron job (just for testing), also does the right thing. Now I'm trying to accomplish the same result v

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

On Apr 28, 2016, at 3:15 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 4/28/2016 2:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21 > > >> debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 >> Debian-5ubuntu1.8 >> debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

Am 28.04.2016 um 21:29 schrieb Albin Otterhäll : > On 2016-04-28 21:08, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> repository gpg can be found in >> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ >> >> read the repo file(s) in >> >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ >> >> cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo >> # CentOS-Base.repo >> # >> # The mirror sys

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

On 04/28/2016 07:51 AM, isdtor wrote: > Johnny Hughes writes: > [...] >> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a >> couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on >> https://ci.centos.org/ > > Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon

[CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 * All the add-ons (language dictionaries, Adblock Plus, Classic Theme Restorer etc.) were disabled with no simple method of reactivating them. Reason given was they were "unsigned". * About:config xpinstall.signatures.req

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS rebuilt and released it. What, exactly,

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

> Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016 22:27:16 -0400 > From: Jonathan Billings > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: >> >> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR >> 45.1.0 > > Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see > https://rh

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 > > Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RH

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 03:05 +, Richard wrote: > The issue for ESR people is that they didn't get eased into it the > way standard FF users did - over the course of three releases. FF40 > was released in october of last year, so by now hopefully extension > developers have gotten their code si

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 03:05 +, Richard wrote: > This explains the extension signing, and timeline, a bit: > > > > Note that the unsigned override that you used is going away with FF47. Thanks for the link. I like the idea of a so-calle