Hello every one I installed the official
flash plugin from adobe
About Plugins tells me:
Datei: libflashplayer.so
Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
Version: 11.2.202.577
Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE)
Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202
But it is:
While this is a developer edition only
i delete
rm -rf $HOME/.mozilla
this be can be done better but now flash looks ok to
Datei: libflashplayer.so
Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
Version: 11.2.202.616
Status: Aktiviert
Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202
___
On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
Hello every one I installed the official
flash plugin from adobe
About Plugins tells me:
Datei: libflashplayer.so
Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
Version: 11.2.202.577
Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_A
On 2016-04-26, Alice Wonder
wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe
>>
>> About Plugins tells me:
>>
>> Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad:
>> /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.577
>>
> Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 09:26:11 +
> From: Liam O'Toole
>
> On 2016-04-26, Alice Wonder
> wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>>> Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe
>>>
>>> About Plugins tells me:
>>>
>>> Datei: libflashplaye
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler
wrote:
> Hello every one I installed the official
> flash plugin from adobe
>
> About Plugins tells me:
>
> Datei: libflashplayer.so
> Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
> Version: 11.2.202.577
>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
Do as allready commited:
close firefox
uninstall fash
start firefox
close firefox
install flash
hopefully this works for you.
config is inside $HOME/.mozzilla
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2016, 13:54 +0200 schrieb wwp:
> Hello Andreas,
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler
> wro
Hello everyone,
while i was play around with winhq install
winbind-clients.
After this I never can open evolution with exchange ews connector.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765106
I patches libsoup by my self
diff -up ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c.prev ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c
-
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:18:15 +0200 Andreas Benzler
wrote:
> Do as allready commited:
>
> close firefox
> uninstall fash
> start firefox
> close firefox
> install flash
> hopefully this works for you.
>
> config is inside $HOME/.mozzilla
It simply worked, thanks!
Regards,
>
Hi, folks,
Our system gets/creates /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth/,pem, then
deletes it when the log out. selinux (in permissive mode) complains.
First, I changed the context to cert_t, and *now* it complains that
ksh93 wants write, etc access on the directory. grep ssh-x509-auth
/var/log/audit/audit.l
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:54, wwp wrote:
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote:
Hello every one I installed the official
flash plugin from adobe
About Plugins tells me:
Datei: libflashplayer.so
Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
Versi
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:04:41PM +0200, Yamaban wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:54, wwp wrote:
>
> >Hello Andreas,
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote:
> >
> >>Hello every one I installed the official
> >>flash plugin from adobe
> >>
> >>About Plugins tells me:
>
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 19:04 +0200, Yamaban wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:54, wwp wrote:
>
> > Hello Andreas,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote:
> >
> >> Hello every one I installed the official
> >> flash plugin from adobe
> >>
> >> About Plugins tells me:
> >>
I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having
systemd-journald corruption (which stops ALL logging, including syslog).
Interestingly, they are all spam-scanning servers running amavisd-new
(so could be some particular pattern is triggering it).
Is there a "supported" way to j
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 2:09 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having
> systemd-journald corruption
Determined with 'journalctl --verify' or another way?
(which stops ALL logging, including syslog).
> Interestingly, they are all spam-scanning
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 2:09 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> > I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having
> > systemd-journald corruption
>
> Determined with 'journalctl --verify' or another way?
I get messages like this in dmesg:
[4756650.
Best label available I can see is sshd_var_run_t. Not exactly named
well but it would work.
chcon -R -t sshd_var_run_t /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth
On 04/26/2016 11:31 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi, folks,
Our system gets/creates /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth/,pem, then
deletes it when the log ou
Hey guys,
I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise.
Never more than 15 web servers for most sites.
But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the
client.I actually like to install Apache and PHP from source and by
hand. Although I know that's cons
I recently installed the package that
allows having virtual printers under CUPS.
I used the localhost:631 GUI to add a virtual pdf printer.
I do not remember what I did.
Now there are two virtual printers,
one named Cups-PDF and the one I named pdfprinter.
I cannot find the output from either.
I
On 4/26/2016 3:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
I like to use the latest, stable versions of apache and php for my
clients without having to create a custom RPM every time a new version
comes out.
So what I'd like to know is it better in your opinion to install from
repos than to install by source as a
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:57:31 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Now there are two virtual printers,
> one named Cups-PDF
Out of the box, cups-pdf creates a pdf and puts it on your desktop.
You can configure that with /etc/cups/cups-pdf.conf
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~
If you need more recent versions checkout softwarecollections.org. It has
more recent rebuilds of the big package suites that install under /opt and
don't collide with the system installed packages. There is a CentOS
specific channel in there somewhere.
_
On 04/26/2016 03:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
So what I'd like to know is it better in your opinion to install from
repos than to install by source as a best practice?
Your tools should save you time.
Building packages should involve three steps: download the source,
update the version number in
On 04/26/2016 03:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise.
Never more than 15 web servers for most sites.
But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the
client.I actually like to install Apache and PHP from sou
Hello List,
Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one
of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all
news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim.
Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or something else?
T
On 26/04/16 09:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one
> of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all
> news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim.
> Is this true, is
There was the "Shell Shock" Vulnerability patched on the 24th of September
2014
Maybe this person was Misinformed after this incident.
Microsoft and Ubuntu just announced BASH for Windows ( they called it Linux
on Windows or something like that ).
On 27 April 2016 at 13:47, Digimer wrote:
> O
On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one
of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's
all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the
claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bour
On 04/26/2016 06:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one
of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's
all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the
claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bour
On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
>>
>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one
>> of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's
>> all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corrobor
On 04/26/2016 07:21 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one
of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's
all news to me, and I cannot fi
On 4/26/2016 7:27 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
bash is mostly compatible with bourne (can run most bourne scripts)
which is why /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash on GNU and most other
*nix systems.
when bash is invoked as /bin/sh, it reverts to more Bourne like
behaviors in some circumstances
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 2:09 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>> > I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having
>> > systemd-journald corruption
>>
>> Determined with 'journalctl --verify' or
34 matches
Mail list logo
