Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
Em 09-03-2016 01:54, John R Pierce escreveu:
On 3/8/2016 8:47 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:
Here is documentation that may help
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html but as John
mentions
it is painful to get right.
sadly, that document is like 15 years old, and hasn't been updated.
greetings.
today i attempted to update update for the nss-util. i selected the
x86_64, clicked apply, error message popped up showing a conflict
because the i686 was also installed.
opened yumex to see what i686 was installed and found a bunch of i686.
because system is a dual core 64 bit, i de
greets.
tho this is off-topic for this list, it is still a bug that centos users
along with all users of firefox should be aware of.
due to nature of bug and what is involved, i believe it safer to not go
into great details in an open list. never know which 'hats' are subscribed
to support list.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM, g wrote:
>
> greets.
>
> tho this is off-topic for this list, it is still a bug that centos users
> along with all users of firefox should be aware of.
>
What version of CentOS and Firefox?
>
> due to nature of bug and what is involved, i believe it safer to not
On 03/09/16 12:46, Mike - st257 wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM, g wrote:
<<>>
> What version of CentOS and Firefox?
>
--
centos 6.7, firefox 38.6.1.
<<>>
>> so my question is just who should i inform of problem?
>>
>> mozilla.org? author of add-on? cve.mitre.org? all 3?
>
> Author
On 09/03/16 19:11, g wrote:
On 03/09/16 12:46, Mike - st257 wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM, g wrote:
<<>>
What version of CentOS and Firefox?
--
centos 6.7, firefox 38.6.1.
Does it affect the latest version of Firefox just released:
firefox-38.7.0-1.el6_7
Is the bug in Fire
On 03/09/2016 10:12 AM, g wrote:
in "closing the gate after the horses have left the corral", i am
asking is what i did good or bad.
If you try to run a program and it doesn't run, then removing i686 might
have been bad. Wine is definitely one that will pull in a long list of
i686 dependenci
On 3/9/2016 1:20 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 03/09/2016 10:12 AM, g wrote:
in "closing the gate after the horses have left the corral", i am
asking is what i did good or bad.
If you try to run a program and it doesn't run, then removing i686
might have been bad. Wine is definitely one that
I did this once more than 10 years ago. If I was to do it again, I would
probably get shorewall to do most of the heavy lifting:
http://shorewall.net/MultiISP.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 03/09/16 15:20, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 10:12 AM, g wrote:
>> in "closing the gate after the horses have left the corral", i am
>> asking is what i did good or bad.
>
> If you try to run a program and it doesn't run, then removing i686 might
> have been bad. Wine is definitely
On 03/09/16 15:33, John R Pierce wrote:
<<<>>>
> A minor(?) downside of too many unneeded packages is how much time yum
> update takes.
>
--
very true. except i do now believe that most of what i took out is what
i put back when i installed wine 32 bit. :-D
--
peace out.
If Bill Gates got
On 03/09/16 14:28, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 09/03/16 19:11, g wrote:
<<<>>>
> Does it affect the latest version of Firefox just released:
>
> firefox-38.7.0-1.el6_7
>
> Is the bug in Firefox or the add-on.
>
> If the bug is in Firefox, then I would report it to Red Hat. CentOS will
> not fix bugs
> Date: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:30:57 -0600
> From: g
>
> On 03/09/16 14:28, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 09/03/16 19:11, g wrote:
> <<<>>>
>
>> Does it affect the latest version of Firefox just released:
>>
>> firefox-38.7.0-1.el6_7
>>
>> Is the bug in Firefox or the add-on.
>>
>> If the b
I did this once more than 10 years ago. If I was to do it again, I would
probably get shorewall to do most of the heavy lifting:
-
Hey, thanks everyone for your help... I thought this would be easy with
iptables, but looks like I have some fun experi
15 matches
Mail list logo
