On 3/7/2016 11:35 PM, anax wrote:
saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many
connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two
days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to
the machine. As far as I know, the ftp server is behind the iptab
On 8 Mar 2016 00:51, "Digimer" wrote:
>
> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
> if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
> same issue as I describe below?
>
> Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build issue would be helpful.
On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" wrote:
>
> Hi
> strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine:
> The following rule is in the iptables of said machine:
>
> [root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\.
> 99 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16
0.0.0.
On 03/08/2016 08:50 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
On 03/08/2016 08:35 PM, anax wrote:
Hi
strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine:
The following rule is in the iptables of said machine:
[root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\.
99 456 DROP all -- *
On 03/08/2016 09:13 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 3/7/2016 11:35 PM, anax wrote:
saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many
connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two
days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to
the machine. As far
On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" wrote:
Hi
strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine:
The following rule is in the iptables of said machine:
[root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\.
99 456 DROP all -
On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" wrote:
Hi
strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine:
The following rule is in the iptables of said machine:
[root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\.
99 456 DROP all -
On 8 March 2016 at 09:22, anax wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>> On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>> strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine:
>>> The following rule is in the iptables of said machine:
>>>
>>> [root@myserver ~]# iptables
Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
> if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
> same issue as I describe below?
>
> Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build issue would be helpful
On 03/08/2016 10:59 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 8 March 2016 at 09:22, anax wrote:
On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" wrote:
Hi
strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine:
The following rule is in the iptables of said machine:
[root@m
On 2016-03-07, ken wrote:
> Weird. There seems to be quite a bit of software missing from C7.2,
> gnome-applets being one of them. Or has it been moved or renamed or
> otherwise obscured?
>
> tia
Since gnome-panel and 'flashback' mode have been removed from GNOME 3,
gnome-applets is no longer
On 8 March 2016 at 10:13, anax wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2016 10:59 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>> On 8 March 2016 at 09:22, anax wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" wrote:
> Hi
> strange behaviour of iptables on a c
On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
> > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
> > same issue as I describe below?
> >
> > Alternatively,
On 03/07/16 22:53, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:12:25PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:58:06PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:17:29PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:25:30AM -0500, m.r...@
Maybe world has changed I am not aware and I am still the old fashion way
where I download a DVD image and install from there like in CentOS but has
Fedora changed something? I mean I am trying to find the proper image for
download it put on USB flash memory and install on my PC but all that I can
On 3/8/16, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
> Maybe world has changed I am not aware and I am still the old fashion way
> where I download a DVD image and install from there like in CentOS but has
> Fedora changed something? I mean I am trying to find the proper image for
> download it put on USB flash
I think nearly all the fedora images are live CDs now. They should have an
option to install fedora when you boot the cd. Usually when you boot the
cd. A window appears asking to either install the os or try it out. If you
are using a non gnome cd,you may have to search the application menu for
t
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 09:00:44AM -0500, mechy2k2000 wrote:
> I think nearly all the fedora images are live CDs now. They should have an
> option to install fedora when you boot the cd. Usually when you boot the
> cd. A window appears asking to either install the os or try it out. If you
> are u
It appears likely that within the next two quarters we will be moving
off of our IPv4 class C's and onto a single IPv6 /40 for our sites.
We have a fairly complex IPTables setup which handles our gateways and
internal hosts. My question is just how much effort is involved in
moving these rules fr
Hello All,
slightly unrelated because lightdm = epel, I know.
Still, maybe someone had the same issue.
When using the last two kernels, some machines give me trouble when installing
Centos7 and Mate
One machine is basically an Asrock board, on this I get no login screen:
descr
(I've already sent this to centos-devel almost a week ago but didn't
get any reply.)
I'm evaluating dm-cache on kernels 3.18.21-17.el6.x86_64 (Xen 4) and
2.6.32-573.7.1.el6.x86_64 (KVM). The test I do is a simple sequential
read using dd(1). read_promote_adjustment and sequential_threshold
have be
On 03/07/2016 11:07 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/monthly/7/
>
> A very useful resource. Updates takes less time after install.
>
> Just curious if there are torrents for them?
>
> I could commit to running a single seed for the x86_64 "everything" ISO.
>
> I dd them ont
On 03/08/2016 06:49 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2016-03-07, ken wrote:
Weird. There seems to be quite a bit of software missing from C7.2,
gnome-applets being one of them. Or has it been moved or renamed or
otherwise obscured?
tia
Since gnome-panel and 'flashback' mode have been removed fro
On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
>> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
>>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
>>> if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
>>> same i
On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was
> asking
> >>> if anyone tried build
On 2016-03-08, ken wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 06:49 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> On 2016-03-07, ken wrote:
>>> Weird. There seems to be quite a bit of software missing from C7.2,
>>> gnome-applets being one of them. Or has it been moved or renamed or
>>> otherwise obscured?
>>>
>>> tia
>>
>> Since gn
On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
>> wrote:
>>>
Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That
> Date: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 17:16:55 +
> From: Liam O'Toole
>
> On 2016-03-08, ken wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 06:49 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>>> On 2016-03-07, ken wrote:
Weird. There seems to be quite a bit of software missing from
C7.2, gnome-applets being one of them. Or has
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 09:00:44AM -0500, mechy2k2000 wrote:
> > I think nearly all the fedora images are live CDs now. They should have
> an
> > option to install fedora when you boot the cd. Usually when you boot the
> > cd. A window appe
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:44:51PM +0100, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be wrote:
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
>
> slightly unrelated because lightdm = epel, I know.
>
>
> Still, maybe someone had the same issue.
>
>
> When using the last two kernels, some machines give me trouble when
> install
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 17:16:55 + (UTC)
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> No, many before you have similarly bemoaned the changes made during the
> transition from GNOME 2 to 3.
You can also look at Mate, which is basically Gnome 2 (what you have on Centos
6 and earlier) but updated to work on Centos 7.
It
On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
>
On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
>>>
On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
wrote:
>
>
On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
> >>>
> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > O
On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
>>>
On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 0
On 8 March 2016 at 19:13, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
> >>>
> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > O
On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856
>>>
>>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock
>> ...
>>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed.
>>>
>>> Decided to do a quick test of something given
On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856
> >>>
> >>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock
> >> ...
> >>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed
On 08/03/16 02:45 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856
>
> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock
...
> got t
On 03/07/16 01:54, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/6/2016 8:25 PM, g wrote:
>> ok. so how about;
>>
>>yum shell install < pkginstalllist.file
>
>
> yum install $(cat pkginstallist.file)
> or
> yum install `cat pkginstallist.file`
>
> should work unless that list is stupid long.
>
--
al
On 02/28/16 04:43, Karanbir Singh wrote:
<>
> So what I am wondering is if there is an easy way to have the tuned-adm
> reset profiles based on external power source. If I'm at the work table
> and plugged in, run with throughput-performance mode, and if the
> external power is disconnected, run
On 03/07/16 09:06, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> This it is a very easy process to create an installable usb key:
>
--
yes, it is. for some reason or other, i seldom remember to use it.
too much using gui desktop. ;-)
for sure, this reply and reply from John R Pierce are being added
to my 'tricks and
Everyone,
I am putting together a new gateway machine that controls all of the
traffic in and out of one of our offices. We we have a machine with
CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) with 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
kernel which is now equipped with three nic cards. We decided to
change our in
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 09:41:43PM -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I am putting together a new gateway machine that controls all of the
> traffic in and out of one of our offices. We we have a machine with
> CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) with 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
> ke
On 3/8/2016 8:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
though I have no personal experience with this, I'm guessing that
the term you want is "bonding" or "bonded interfaces". You can probably
find articles on how to do that with some judicious googling.
I know I've seen such articles, but haven't kept any recor
Hi
Here is documentation that may help
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html but as John mentions
it is painful to get right.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/8/2016 8:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> though I have no personal experience with this, I'm
On 3/8/2016 8:47 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:
Here is documentation that may help
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html but as John mentions
it is painful to get right.
sadly, that document is like 15 years old, and hasn't been updated.
the basics are still valid, but things like
47 matches
Mail list logo
