In article <75d47fdc6a99f24f87a6465baf326d5018c50...@columba02.user.uu.se>,
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
> > Sent: den 1 februari 2016 20:34
> > To: CentOS
> > Subject: [Cen
On 02/02/2016 12:56 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 02/01/16 14:20, Yamaban wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:22, H wrote:
I have installed the kate editor on Centos 6.7 but it seems to be a
very old version, 3.3.4, installed as part of kdesdk. On Centos 7 I
can simply run 'yum install kate' but, alas
On 02/01/2016 08:20 PM, Yamaban wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:22, H wrote:
I have installed the kate editor on Centos 6.7 but it seems to be a
very old version, 3.3.4, installed as part of kdesdk. On Centos 7 I
can simply run 'yum install kate' but, alas, not on Centos 6.
What is the recomme
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:22:44PM -0500, H wrote:
> I have installed the kate editor on Centos 6.7 but it seems to be a
> very old version, 3.3.4, installed as part of kdesdk. On Centos 7 I
> can simply run 'yum install kate' but, alas, not on Centos 6.
>
> What is the recommended way of updatin
On 02/02/2016 09:28 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
CentOS is not a bleeding-edge distribution that constantly keeps
packages up to date with the upstream projects. If you want that, try
another distribution like Fedora.
GNOME can get a rebase to a newer version, but KDE can't. this from
a f
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> That's only necessary for things that are initialized in the initrd.
> Unless you are using network boot, the initrd won't have any of the
> network initialization, so rebuilding it is not necessary for changing
> network-related config (incl
On 02/02/2016 03:50 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 02/02/2016 09:28 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
CentOS is not a bleeding-edge distribution that constantly keeps
packages up to date with the upstream projects. If you want that, try
another distribution like Fedora.
GNOME can get a rebase to a newer
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:02:40 +0100
H wrote:
> What do people use as a programming editor on CentOS 6?
I personally use Geany and/or vim, depending on what I'm doing and how I'm
doing it.
You can find pre-compiled rpms for the latest version of geany for Centos 6 and
7 on my website if you want
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:18:09 + (UTC)
Tony Mountifield wrote:
> killing the UEFI stuff stops you ever being able to do a re-install on that
> box. Is that correct?
Apparently so.
> Is there no way to do a factory reset of the BIOS?
Apparently not.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:02:40PM +0100, H wrote:
> What do people use as a programming editor on CentOS 6? My first impression
> of kate was favorable, not only did it support the usual programming and
> scripting languages but also markdown which I have recently discovered...
I don't want to sp
Once upon a time, Frank Cox said:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:18:09 + (UTC)
> Tony Mountifield wrote:
> > killing the UEFI stuff stops you ever being able to do a re-install on
> > that box. Is that correct?
>
> Apparently so.
Just to clarify: this appears to be a problem with some particular
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:02, H wrote:
On 02/02/2016 03:50 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 02/02/2016 09:28 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> CentOS is not a bleeding-edge distribution that constantly keeps
> packages up to date with the upstream projects. If you want that, try
> another distribution lik
On 2/2/2016 12:02 PM, H wrote:
> What do people use as a programming editor on CentOS 6? My first
> impression of kate was favorable, not only did it support the usual
> programming and scripting languages but also markdown which I have
I used gedit and Windows' Notepad for a long time until I s
In the last month, we've discovered a new, a, "feature" in the version
of the version of NFS with CentOS 7: on startup, if it cannot resolve a
given host, it dies. It does not continue on up, with all the other hosts
it's exporting to, and just log a message.
Is there a workaround, or a config
My NFS server is up and other clients can access x. One particular client
can't. I tried to unmount the NFS share:
[root@nfsclient ~]# umount -f /disk/x
umount2: Device or resource busy
umount.nfs: /disk/x: device is busy
umount2: Device or resource busy
umount.nfs: /disk/x: device is busy
If I
Try "umount -fl"('eff el')
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Dave Burns wrote:
> My NFS server is up and other clients can access x. One particular client
> can't. I tried to unmount the NFS share:
>
> [root@nfsclient ~]# umount -f /disk/x
> umount2: Device or resource busy
> umount.n
Dave Burns wrote:
> My NFS server is up and other clients can access x. One particular client
> can't. I tried to unmount the NFS share:
>
> [root@nfsclient ~]# umount -f /disk/x
> umount2: Device or resource busy
> umount.nfs: /disk/x: device is busy
> umount2: Device or resource busy
> umount.nf
umount -fl /mount/point
And configure it after with autofs
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 20:00, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>
> Try "umount -fl"('eff el')
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Dave Burns wrote:
>>
>> My NFS server is up and other clients can access x. One
El Martes 02/02/2016, m.r...@5-cent.us escribió:
> In the last month, we've discovered a new, a, "feature" in the version
> of the version of NFS with CentOS 7: on startup, if it cannot resolve a
> given host, it dies. It does not continue on up, with all the other hosts
> it's exporting to, an
Ricardo J. Barberis wrote:
> El Martes 02/02/2016, m.r...@5-cent.us escribió:
>> In the last month, we've discovered a new, a, "feature" in the
>> version of the version of NFS with CentOS 7: on startup, if it
>> cannot resolve a given host, it dies. It does not continue on up,
>> with all the
On 02/02/16 12:02, H wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 03:50 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On 02/02/2016 09:28 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>> CentOS is not a bleeding-edge distribution that constantly keeps
>>> packages up to date with the upstream projects. If you want that, try
>>> another distribution like F
Dear All,
Suppose I executed the command
rm -rf /
on my CentOS 7 box. After it did what it could, how much damage will be
done to what I have (or _had_ rather ;-) on my hard drive?
I'm going to describe simple experiment which was prompted in another
thread. I need to say a few words before I d
I'd like to know what the cause of a particular DB server's slowdown might be.
We've ruled out IOPs for the disks (~ 20%) and raw CPU load (top shows perhaps
1/2 of cores busy, but the system slows to a crawl.
We're suspecting that we're simply running out of memory bandwidth but have no
way t
On 2/2/2016 5:34 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
I'd like to know what the cause of a particular DB server's slowdown might be.
We've ruled out IOPs for the disks (~ 20%) and raw CPU load (top shows perhaps
1/2 of cores busy, but the system slows to a crawl.
We're suspecting that we're simply running
On 02/02/2016 04:57 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Suppose I executed the command
rm -rf /
on my CentOS 7 box. After it did what it could, how much damage will be
done to what I have (or _had_ rather ;-) on my hard drive?
In your experiment, rm processed /boot and /data first, and then /proc,
where
On 02/02/2016 05:34 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
We've ruled out IOPs for the disks (~ 20%)
How did you measure that? What filesystem are you using? What is the
disk / array configuration?
Which database?
If you run "iostat -x 2" what does a representative summary look like?
and raw CPU l
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 at 20:34 -, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Any idea?
Wild guessing...How old a system? ~5 year old Nehalem? If so try:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim_mode
For some memory performance diagnosing try 'sar':
sar -B 10
There are lots of other sar options which might
I suppose, CentOS 7 ships with DVD and minimal version.
While the minimal version is just 700M, what makes the minimal along with a
GUI about 4.3 GB.
Isint it too huge for an OS ?
--
Cheers
--
S.Ramaseshan
Engineer
fractalio.com
ramases...@fractalio.com
On 02/02/16 10:15 PM, Ramaseshan S wrote:
> I suppose, CentOS 7 ships with DVD and minimal version.
>
> While the minimal version is just 700M, what makes the minimal along with a
> GUI about 4.3 GB.
>
> Isint it too huge for an OS ?
Remember that it is based on upstream. Anyway, there is a LOT
On 03/02/16 16:15, Ramaseshan S wrote:
> While the minimal version is just 700M, what makes the minimal along with a
> GUI about 4.3 GB.
All the extra packages, libs, etc that are needed to support the GUI,
plus the extra apps that are available to run in the GUI (such as
LibreOffice, FireFox, etc
Yep, This is true,
If I look at Fedora Gnome for example, which also ships all
these(browser,libre, gnome etc), the final DVD version is just about 1.2 GB.
That is what surprises me.
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 08:52 AM, Peter wrote:
> On 03/02/16 16:15, Ramaseshan S wrote:
>> While the minimal
redhat (centos) ships lot's of stuff. you don't really need to install
*everything* unless you have very specific needs..
2016-02-03 8:15 GMT+02:00 Ramaseshan :
> Yep, This is true,
> If I look at Fedora Gnome for example, which also ships all
> these(browser,libre, gnome etc), the final DVD vers
On 2/2/2016 10:29 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
redhat (centos) ships lot's of stuff. you don't really need to install
*everything* unless you have very specific needs..
I pretty much always install the 'minimal' ISO then install the specific
packages I need with yum.
lots of reasons, not the
33 matches
Mail list logo
