Hello,
I have a big problem with fail2ban and firewalld on my new system.
I have a server running (CentOS 7.1) and run a Update to 7.2 on this system
all is working ?
BUT I install a new system with CentOS 7 1511 on this systems fail2ban don't
work anymore. I have this error or more, in the f
In article <1612557.81lQ3GSSy2@techz>,
Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a big problem with fail2ban and firewalld on my new system.
>
> I have a server running (CentOS 7.1) and run a Update to 7.2 on this system
> all is working ?
>
> BUT I install a new system with CentOS 7
On 12/15/2015 07:05 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
The first time yum installs a package, it asks to import the GPG key
used to sign the packages. Most people accept without validating the key.
While that is true, it is important to note that yum will only import
keys that are already installed on di
Hello,
Am Saturday 19 December 2015, 09:37:14 schrieb Tony Mountifield:
> In article <1612557.81lQ3GSSy2@techz>,
>
> Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a big problem with fail2ban and firewalld on my new system.
> >
> > I have a server running (CentOS 7.1) and run a Update
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
Many years ago, we began scrapping the RTOS approach for some
of our timing-critical applications. Our first applications
were based on Solaris real-time extensions and served well us
well for many years. Then came the era of shaky support for
Intel Solaris and we moved many applications to Linux
On 12/19/2015 02:12 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/15/2015 07:05 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
The first time yum installs a package, it asks to import the GPG key
used to sign the packages. Most people accept without validating the key.
While that is true, it is important to note that yum will o
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 09:49 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote:
> DNS verification solves that issue.
How reliably safe is that ?
Crack the DNS access and inflict viruses, trojans etc. with authorised
impunity ?
Happy Christmas.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the European
On 12/19/2015 4:24 AM, Chris Olson wrote:
Is there some fundamental difference between these methods of
output to the driver that might trip us up as we simplify the
scripts and port to new computer platforms?
assuming 'serial' means RS232 asynch, the biggest tripup is that new
computers don't
Hey guys,
I've setup an LDAP server on our network. I'm using OpenLDAP.
It was really easy to use the authconfig-tui to generate the nsswitch.conf
and ldap.conf files that would allow user authentication.
But when users would log in, the system wasn't creating the home
directories.
I found
You may also need to restart sssd or nslcd, depending upon which one is
running the backed ldap connection service on the clients.
On Dec 19, 2015 14:25, "Tim Dunphy" wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've setup an LDAP server on our network. I'm using OpenLDAP.
>
> It was really easy to use the authconfi
>
> You may also need to restart sssd or nslcd, depending upon which one is
> running the backed ldap connection service on the clients.
Hmm.. I got a different result after restarting nclcd. Instead of logging
me in and just complaining that it couldn't create the home directory, it
still compla
Check /var/log/secure for why the directory is not able to be created.
Might be selinux, is that enabled? (sestatus)
On Dec 19, 2015 15:40, "Tim Dunphy" wrote:
> >
> > You may also need to restart sssd or nslcd, depending upon which one is
> > running the backed ldap connection service on the cl
>
> Check /var/log/secure for why the directory is not able to be created.
> Might be selinux, is that enabled? (sestatus)
Good catch! It was indeed SELinux preventing the directory from being
created. Disabling it allows that to happen. For instance I just created a
new test user in LDAP:
#ssh
On 12/19/2015 10:27 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 09:49 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote:
DNS verification solves that issue.
How reliably safe is that ?
Crack the DNS access and inflict viruses, trojans etc. with authorised
impunity ?
Happy Christmas.
No, if you manage to c
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:29:05PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:32:53AM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On 12/17/2015 08:33 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > >Hi all!
> > >
> > >I'm trying to finish setting up my newly upgraded C7 system.
> > >
> > >It's on the same hardware I ran C6
16 matches
Mail list logo
