http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/misc/el7/x86_64/tsocks-1.8-0.14.beta5.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm
Stolen from Fedora 22.
Enjoy
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Leroy Tennison"
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 December,
Hi All,
I'm trying to disable USB storage devices in Centos7.1.1503.
I've setup udev rules to block all usb devices and then additional rules
to allow specific vendors / products to be used (mainly keyboards and
mice). This is all working perfectly.
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/01-usblockdown.rules
# B
On Tue, December 8, 2015 11:05, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use
>> on
>> a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server
>> distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them
>> until they manifested the
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hundreds of contributors introduces something t
After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making
it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging
mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say,
arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with
kerberos? I see
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:37:33AM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> >So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> >that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> >developers and then point out whenever any
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
> hundreds of contributor
Thanks, I got swamped after sending this but will get back to it soon.
- Original Message -
From: "Nux!"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 3:16:21 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] tsocks or equivalent for CentOS 7
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/misc/el7/x86_64/tsocks-1.
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
>> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
>> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
>> hundreds of contr
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
> premises" part seems like a good start.
Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of my
users yesterday that
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:45:55AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'm sure it's *far* too much work for, say, the fedora development team to
> put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific
> Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major
> changes,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:54:57AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
> > premises" part seems like a good start.
>
> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of my
Because of
On 12/09/2015 09:37 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hund
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:54:57AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
>> > premises" part seems like a good start.
>>
>> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of
> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user
> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement.
> So, you're saying
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:15:56PM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
> I think saying that you can have some say as to what goes into Fedora
> is being a little naive, look at systemd, many people complained
> about its inclusion but the powers to be heard none of it, and the
That's not a historically acc
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one
>> of
>> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user
>> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and inv
On 12/09/2015 05:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hundreds of contributors introduces something t
On 12/08/2015 07:46 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use on
a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server
distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them
until they manifested themselves on equipment unde
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making
> it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging
> mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say,
> arcane)
On 12/09/2015 11:45 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm sure it's *far* too much work for, say, the fedora development team to
put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific
Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major
changes, and see the feedback
On 9 Dec 2015 9:07 p.m., "Lamar Owen" wrote:
>
> No, it seems to me that a suitably motivated CentOS user needs to scratch
this itch; and, no, I am not volunteering, as I've followed Fedora
before..and just simply cannot give the time to it at this point in
time in my life.
>
>
> So who wa
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby
>> making it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not
>> have a paging mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to
>>
23 matches
Mail list logo
