On 12/04/2015 12:46 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:06:14PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> i dont see it being dropped, on my completely updated machine i still
>> see the fully qualified numbering in /etc/centos-release ( as an example ) ?
>
> I know this is a big, confus
I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
to everything.
He is right. We are stuck with the numbering system.
On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 12:46 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The bottom line is, our numbering system works for us to be able to do
> all those things.
>
>
> > The first is "7.1.1503" and has 895 results, and they aren't html
> > pages, they're things like directories containing that string.
> >
> > The second is strings like "7 (1503)", and has 1,700+ results, and
> > they are the html pages.
> >
>
> Puppet, Chef, Ansible and the other CFG Managem
Em 05-12-2015 05:35, Duncan Brown escreveu:
On 04/12/2015 19:17, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
Of some. It's failing on ftrace initialization whi
Folks
My Centos 7 systems are all failing to update because of
Error: Package: orage-4.10.0-4.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
Requires: libicalss.so.0()(64bit)
Removing: libical-0.48-6.el7.x86_64 (@base)
libicalss.so.0()(64bit)
Updated By: libical-1.0.1-1.el7.x
On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 17:39 -0800, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> My Centos 7 systems are all failing to update because of
>
> Error: Package: orage-4.10.0-4.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
> Requires: libicalss.so.0()(64bit)
> Removing: libical-0.48-6.el7.x86_64 (@base)
> li
On 06/12/2015 01:12, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 05-12-2015 05:35, Duncan Brown escreveu:
On 04/12/2015 19:17, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
7 matches
Mail list logo
