[CentOS] MariaDB 10.X Master-Slave Replication

Hi, I am configuring master-slave replication in a MariaDB 10.X over Centos 7.1 and I am having some troubles. When I configure the slave I use the following directies in my.cnf: ... master-host = 192.168.122.2 master-user = slave_user master-password = qwerty mas

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 129, Issue 5

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ.

[CentOS] Shorewall and the latest kernel problem

I just installed the latest kernel 2.6.32-573.8.1.el6.x86_64 and when I rebooted it shorewall (shorewall-4.5.4-1.el6.noarch) failed with the following error ERROR: a non-empty masq file requires NAT in your kernel and iptables /etc/shorewall/masq (line 15) Question is is this a problem in th

Re: [CentOS] About IPv6 Link-Local Address(CentOS5)

On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:57 +0900, 米山陽介 wrote: > I am using the CentOS5.7. The current version of Centos 5, is 5.11 An immediate upgrade is recommeneded. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Shorewall and the latest kernel problem

Em 12-11-2015 11:12, Pete Geenhuizen escreveu: I just installed the latest kernel 2.6.32-573.8.1.el6.x86_64 and when I rebooted it shorewall (shorewall-4.5.4-1.el6.noarch) failed with the following error ERROR: a non-empty masq file requires NAT in your kernel and iptables /etc/shorewall/masq (l

Re: [CentOS] Shorewall and the latest kernel problem

On 11/12/15 10:46, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: Em 12-11-2015 11:12, Pete Geenhuizen escreveu: That points to something different in kernel. What is your 'previous' kernel? Sounds like the nat modules aren't being loaded, for some reason. Marcelo Marcelo, Thanks for the input, it works

Re: [CentOS] Shorewall and the latest kernel problem

I just installed the latest kernel 2.6.32-573.8.1.el6.x86_64 and when I rebooted it shorewall (shorewall-4.5.4-1.el6.noarch) failed with the following error ERROR: a non-empty masq file requires NAT in your kernel and iptables /etc/shorewall/masq (line 15) FYI I have the same kernel (2.6.32-57

Re: [CentOS] About IPv6 Link-Local Address(CentOS5)

On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, 米山陽介 wrote: Hello Because I did not send , and then retransmitted. I am using the CentOS5.7. In a state where the link down, I did a ping to the IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 succeeds in ping. but, IPv6 is ping fails. Once confirmed by ifconfig, it did not have a Link-Local Address.

[CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the oper

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: DEVICE=enp0s3 #HWADDR=08:00:27:AB:1D:E6 BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT=yes NM_CONTROLLED=no BRIDGE=br0 DEVICE=enp0s8 HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6 BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT=yes NM_CONTROLLED=no BRIDGE=br0 Do you have those two devices connected to the same LAN? I

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

2015-11-12 16:51 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer : > On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> DEVICE=enp0s3 >> #HWADDR=08:00:27:AB:1D:E6 >> BOOTPROTO=none >> ONBOOT=yes >> NM_CONTROLLED=no >> BRIDGE=br0 >> > > DEVICE=enp0s8 >> HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6 >> BOOTPROTO=none >> ONBOOT=yes >> NM_CONTRO

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

On 11/12/2015 12:00 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: 2015-11-12 16:51 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer : Do you have those two devices connected to the same LAN? Yes I have. Well, that will create a switch loop and flood the LAN with broadcast traffic. We can probably offer better advice if you tell us wh

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

- Original Message - | Hi, | | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as | follows: | | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own | address as source address | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 wit

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

Am 12.11.2015 um 19:42 schrieb Sergio Belkin: [root@localhost ~]# uname -a Linux localhost 3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 30 12:09:22 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux First of all: yum update to current! Alexander ___ CentOS mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: DEVICE=enp0s8 HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6 BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT=yes NM_CONTROLLED=no BRIDGE=br0 DEVICE=lo TYPE=loopback IPADDR=127.0.0.1 NETMASK=255.0.0.0 NETWORK=127.0.0.0 ... I hope thats two seperate files, ifcfg-enp0s8 and ifcfg-lo ... otherwise, wh

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

If you really need two bridges on the same LAN you will need to turn on STP and give your interfaces a delay of say 10 seconds on start up. Sorry, cant remember options to do that. Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 25

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

I did exactly this with ZFS on Linux and cut over 24 hours of backup lag to just minutes. If you're managing data at scale, ZFS just rocks... On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 01:16:28 PM Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 10, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 11/09/2015 09:22 PM, Arun K

Re: [CentOS] About IPv6 Link-Local Address(CentOS5)

> The current version of Centos 5, is 5.11 > > An immediate upgrade is recommeneded. Thanks for the response. I have updated CentOS5 to 11. However, It did not resolve On 2015/11/12 23:05, Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:57 +0900, 米山陽介 wrote: I am using the CentOS5.7.

Re: [CentOS] About IPv6 Link-Local Address(CentOS5)

> Try > >ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 Thanks for the response. I tried. However, It did not resolve # ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 PING 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8(2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8) from fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a eth1: 56 data bytes On 2015/11/13 2

Re: [CentOS] MariaDB 10.X Master-Slave Replication

Try: maria-disc...@lists.launchpad.net They should have a very clear answer. Also have you tried this: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/+search/?q=replication&quick=1&source=kb&search=Search https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/setting-up-replication/ All The Bests, Eliezer On 12/11/2015 13:09, melkor.kp

[CentOS] Fresh installation using usb

Hi, I am trying to install Centos 7 on Dell poweredge server. It prompts i8042 controller not found. After that screen was not moving. With regards, Shiva -- Shiva Prasad Nath 92981134 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.or

Re: [CentOS] Fresh installation using usb

what is model of your poweredge server? did you wait some minutes after error message? -- Eero 2015-11-13 7:35 GMT+02:00 Siva Prasad Nath : > Hi, > I am trying to install Centos 7 on Dell poweredge server. It prompts i8042 > controller not found. After that screen was not moving. > > With regard

[CentOS] Fresh installation using usb

​ 20151113_123827.mp4 ​We are using R630. Do you think it is better to install from DVD? Few times I waited for a long time. Bar was not moving in the screen. Please refer to the video. On Friday, November 13, 2015,