hello,
I have now update a System from Centos 7 to 7(1) with all updates now the
firewall-config don't work anymore :-(.
Why is firewall-config working on a (old) Centos 7 but not on a CentOs 7(1)?
I have this Error now
** (firewall-config:30598): WARNING **: Couldn't connect to accessibil
On 10/29/2015 01:56 AM, Shyam S wrote:
Hello All,
I'm a bit of newbie with rpm/yum, seeking the help from rpm/yum experts.
Suppose I have an RPM package A which depends on package B.
RPM A's spec has 'Requires:B' tag with 'autoprov' and 'autoreq' enabled.
When I install RPM A on a 'centos 6.5
On Wednesday 28 October 2015 21:12:19 Ned Slider wrote:
> On 28/10/15 11:55, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > We are receiving LOTS of emails that contain empty XLS or DOC documents
> > with embedded virus macros. These are getting past SPAMASSASSIN, Clamav
> > and Kaspersky.
> >
> > I'm trying to write
John R Pierce wrote:
>> So I guess the strange IP address probably comes from some Lite-On device
>> somewhere in my house - maybe on the server itself, an HP MicroServer.
> My HP Microserver N40L (the original version), the NIC is Broadcom,
>
> 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation
On a CentOS 6.7 system that's been running fail2ban for a long time, we
recently started seeing this:
ct 28 19:00:59 fail2ban.action[17561]: ERROR iptables -w -D
INPUT -p tcp --dport ssh -j f2b-SSH#012iptables -w -F f2b-SSH#012iptables
-w -X f2b-SSH -- stderr: "iptables v1.4.7: option `-w' require
On 10/28/2015 04:59 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Mark Haney wrote:
>
>>> On 10/28/2015 9:04 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>>
Why does "arp -a" show IP address 169.254.192.123
on my 192.168.2.0 home network?
>
>> Sounds like you have a host with a NIC that's configured for DHCP but
>> either
This should probably be a bug report for the fail2ban EPEL maintainer, the
problem was introduced in version 0.9.3
>From the file /etc/fail2ban/action.d/iptables-common.conf
...
# Option: lockingopt
# Notes.: Option was introduced to iptables to prevent multiple instances from
# runnin
In article <1446132814771.22...@slac.stanford.edu>,
Eriksson, Thomas wrote:
> This should probably be a bug report for the fail2ban EPEL maintainer, the
> problem was introduced in version 0.9.3
>
> >From the file /etc/fail2ban/action.d/iptables-common.conf
> ...
> # Option: lockingopt
> # Note
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:12:26PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> I just realized that it's not the screensaver. I find the lock screen is up
> whenever it comes up from standby (and I think a fresh boot, though I've
> not tried to reproduce that yet.) Since I put it in standby a lot rather than
> shut
Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <1446132814771.22...@slac.stanford.edu>,
> Eriksson, Thomas wrote:
>> This should probably be a bug report for the fail2ban EPEL maintainer,
>> the problem was introduced in version 0.9.3
>>
>> >From the file /etc/fail2ban/action.d/iptables-common.conf
>> ...
>
On 29/10/15 10:51, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 October 2015 21:12:19 Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 28/10/15 11:55, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>>> We are receiving LOTS of emails that contain empty XLS or DOC documents
>>> with embedded virus macros. These are getting past SPAMASSASSIN, Clamav
>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:36:27PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:12:26PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> > I just realized that it's not the screensaver. I find the lock screen is up
> > whenever it comes up from standby (and I think a fresh boot, though I've
> > not tried
On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Can you remind me how to switch from one DM to another? I know I
> used to know, but right now cannot recall the proper incantations.
systemctl disable gdm.service
systemctl enable lightdm.service
(reboot or stop gdm and start lightdm from a VT)
-
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 20:37 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Combining multiple simple rules in a meta
> rule is also a great way to detect many spams. If you can find 3 or 4
> factors specific to these spam (the more unique the better), combining
> them usually gives excellent results.
Yep.
In Exim
14 matches
Mail list logo