On 10/06/2015 06:14 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 10/05/2015 11:58 PM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Yes, my problem is very similar as described in Debian's bugtracker.
The problem might be a bug. Ask the openvswitch people.
It looks like the problem is probably:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-
Hi,
I heard that the RHEL/Centos rpm packages of OpenLDAP 2.4 should support
openssl and file pathes to the certs/keys in the online config too.
But from the RHEL Documentation it is stated, that still ONLY Mozilla
NSS DB Files are supported.
Can anyone comment on that? Is that true?
Th
Hit reply instead of reply all. This is for the list.
-- Original Message --
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can one construct an IPTables rule to block on
NS records?
From:"James B. Byrne"
Date:Wed, October 7, 2015 08:52
To: "John R Pierce"
--
On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the
> message of 06/02--
>
> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html
>
> Nor have I seen any additional information. So how is this going?
> I'm almost ready to
On 10/07/2015 08:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the
>> message of 06/02--
>>
>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html
>>
>> Nor have I seen any additional infor
On 10/07/2015 12:07 AM, C.L. Martinez wrote:
Thanks Gordon. I think the same: it is a bug (another one with systemd).
It's not a systemd bug. If I'm correct, it's a bug in the openvswitch
init scripts. It's simply wrong for a component of the network startup
to tell systemd that it needs to
I have tried to setup ssmtp to relay through gmail.
root=my gmail address
AuthUser=my gmail address
AuthPass=my password
FromLineOverride=YES
mailhub=smtp.gmail.com:587
UseSTARTTLS=YES
TLS_CA_FILE=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
I get this error:
Authorization failed (534 5.7.14
https://support
> Date: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 10:39:00 -0400
> From: Jerry Geis
>
> I have tried to setup ssmtp to relay through gmail.
>
> root=my gmail address
> AuthUser=my gmail address
> AuthPass=my password
> FromLineOverride=YES
> mailhub=smtp.gmail.com:587
> UseSTARTTLS=YES
> TLS_CA_FILE=/etc/pki
>I believe that your issue is the fourth bullet point in on the
>support page they link to:
>
> -- Your mail app might not support the latest security
> standards. Learn how to allow less secure apps access
> to your account.
>
>
>If you aren't using OAuth 2.0 (which you aren't in your cont
Hi, folks,
Got an old HP box with a P800 Smart Array controller. The HP RAID box
plugged into it's failing, and we got a new JetStor. Anyone know if we
can just plug the JetStor in and set it to passthrough, or if we have
to use the P800's firmware to set up the RAID, or other gotchas?
I *thin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the
> > message of 06/02--
> >
> > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html
> >
> > Nor have I seen any
On 10/7/2015 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Got an old HP box with a P800 Smart Array controller. The HP RAID box
plugged into it's failing, and we got a new JetStor. Anyone know if we
can just plug the JetStor in and set it to passthrough, or if we have
to use the P800's firmware to set up
On 10/07/15 10:06, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/7/2015 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Got an old HP box with a P800 Smart Array controller. The HP RAID
box
plugged into it's failing, and we got a new JetStor. Anyone know if we
can just plug the JetStor in and set it to passthrough, or if we
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:39:00AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have tried to setup ssmtp to relay through gmail.
>
> root=my gmail address
> AuthUser=my gmail address
> AuthPass=my password
> FromLineOverride=YES
> mailhub=smtp.gmail.com:587
> UseSTARTTLS=YES
> TLS_CA_FILE=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-b
On 10/7/2015 10:29 AM, Jack Bailey wrote:
I have the P822. It has no JBOD or RAID 0. hpacucli works with
CentOS 7.0, but is broken on 7.1 -- it cannot find the controller.
try hpssacli, thats replaced hpacucli and supports the newer controllers
on newer OS's.
--
john r pierce, recycli
Jack Bailey wrote:
> On 10/07/15 10:06, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 10/7/2015 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Got an old HP box with a P800 Smart Array controller. The HP RAID box
>>> plugged into it's failing, and we got a new JetStor. Anyone know if we
>>> can just plug the JetStor in and set
On 10/07/15 11:13, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jack Bailey wrote:
controller that expects to talk to individual SAS or SATA drives. you
can manage it with hpssacli from centos.
I have the P822. It has no JBOD or RAID 0. hpacucli works with CentOS
7.0, but is broken on 7.1 -- it cannot find the c
On 10/7/2015 11:47 AM, Jack Bailey wrote:
On 10/07/15 11:13, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jack Bailey wrote:
controller that expects to talk to individual SAS or SATA drives. you
can manage it with hpssacli from centos.
I have the P822. It has no JBOD or RAID 0. hpacucli works with CentOS
7.0, b
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/7/2015 11:47 AM, Jack Bailey wrote:
>> On 10/07/15 11:13, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Jack Bailey wrote:
>>>
> controller that expects to talk to individual SAS or SATA drives. you
> can manage it with hpssacli from centos.
I have the P822. It has no JBOD
On 10/07/2015 11:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the
>>> message of 06/02--
>>>
>>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/201
On 10/7/2015 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Got an old HP box with a P800 Smart Array controller. The HP RAID box
plugged into it's failing, and we got a new JetStor...
I think the FIRST thing you need to determine, WHAT JetStor do you have,
and what is its host connection ? All the Jet
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/7/2015 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Got an old HP box with a P800 Smart Array controller. The HP RAID
>> box
>> plugged into it's failing, and we got a new JetStor...
>
> I think the FIRST thing you need to determine, WHAT JetStor do you have,
> and what is i
On 10/7/2015 1:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
No. I'm the one who got the quote and set up the order for my managers,
and I know what it's got: the ethernet connection is to the internal
webserver to manage the RAID. the 712S I have is dual-path SAS for data.
then yeah, you'll need a plain SAS2
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/7/2015 1:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> No. I'm the one who got the quote and set up the order for my managers,
>> and I know what it's got: the ethernet connection is to the internal
>> webserver to manage the RAID. the 712S I have is dual-path SAS for data.
>
> the
On 10/7/2015 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
It's an old box, a DL580 G5. And we didn't get the card with the RAID. I
suppose I can single path each RAID from the PERC H800, until budgets open
up.
wait, you originally said HP SmartArrray P800. Now, its a Dell PERC
H800? I'm confused.
--
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/7/2015 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> It's an old box, a DL580 G5. And we didn't get the card with the RAID. I
>> suppose I can single path each RAID from the PERC H800, until budgets
>> open up.
>
> wait, you originally said HP SmartArrray P800. Now, its a Dell P
I have 3 4TB WD drives I want to put in a RAID1 array.
Two WD4000FYYZ
and
One WD4000F9YZ
All enterprise class but two are WD Re and one is WD Se. I ordered
the first two thinking 2 drives in the raid array would be sufficient
but later decided its a long drive to the server so I would rather
h
On 10/7/2015 3:14 PM, Matt wrote:
I have 3 4TB WD drives I want to put in a RAID1 array.
Two WD4000FYYZ
and
One WD4000F9YZ
All enterprise class but two are WD Re and one is WD Se. I ordered
the first two thinking 2 drives in the raid array would be sufficient
but later decided its a long dri
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/7/2015 3:14 PM, Matt wrote:
>> I have 3 4TB WD drives I want to put in a RAID1 array.
>>
>> Two WD4000FYYZ
>>
>> and
>>
>> One WD4000F9YZ
>>
>> All enterprise class but two are WD Re and one is WD Se. I ordered
>> the first two thinking 2 drives in the raid array would
On 10/7/2015 3:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
It's "enterprise" grade, where the two reds are "NAS-ready". In either
case, the TLER should be 7 sec, so it should work. The ones to watch out
for are the desktop grade, like the green (bleah!!!), which have a TLER of
something like 2 MINUTES. That w
Dear Centos Users:
I installed Centos 7 on my server a few months ago. While using ssh, there is
always a strange message "Write failed: Broken pipe”. It forces quit of SSH.
It’s really annoying as it happens very often with irregular time interval -
from a couple of minutes to a few hours. I h
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:33:55 +0800
Hua Wang wrote:
> While using ssh, there is always a strange message "Write failed: Broken
> pipe”. It forces quit of SSH.
It sounds like the network connection between you and the server is dying for
some reason.
That being the case you probably can't fix it y
Hi Frank,
Thanks for your prompt reply. The server is in my office. Because I tried a few
computers, so it shouldn’t be a problem of Internet connection of the clients.
I tried to ping the server, and it can accept all data. Is there a good way to
check it?
It always worked well for centos 6.
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:18:17 +0800
Hua Wang wrote:
> I tried to ping the server, and it can accept all data. Is there a good way
> to check it?
ssh -v, ssh -vv and ssh -vvv might give you some interesting information.
> The problem came out while reinstalling centos 7.7.
Since you're apparently
>
>> I tried to ping the server, and it can accept all data. Is there a good way
>> to check it?
>
> ssh -v, ssh -vv and ssh -vvv might give you some interesting information.
>
Yes, I tried ssh -vvv. It gave a lot of information while login, but it quit
without any further information except
On 07/10/15 23:14, Matt wrote:
> I have 3 4TB WD drives I want to put in a RAID1 array.
>
> Two WD4000FYYZ
>
> and
>
> One WD4000F9YZ
>
> All enterprise class but two are WD Re and one is WD Se. I ordered
> the first two thinking 2 drives in the raid array would be sufficient
> but later decid
36 matches
Mail list logo
