Hi Gordon,
On 17/08/15 19:07, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 08/17/2015 03:34 AM, Michael H wrote:
the [Service] section -
[Service]
LimitSTACK=12288
...
By the errors I will assume that it should be in the [Service] section.
I couldn't find confirmation of this online...
Yes, it belongs in the [
In article <55d20981.7030...@centos.org>,
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2015 10:57 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> > I recently applied updates to a CentOS 5 box running MySQL. I've discovered
> > that the new version of openssl, 0.9.8e-36.0.1.el5_11, breaks MySQL SSL
> > connections.
> >
> > If
On 8/18/2015 1:27 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
You should now be using mysql55 on CentOS-5, not mysql-5.0
That may well be the case, but isn't relevant to the point I'm making,
which is that something changed in openssl-0.9.8e-36 that has broken something.
mysql 5.0 and openssl 0.9.8 are both a
In article <55d2174f.70...@centos.org>,
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2015 11:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 08/17/2015 10:57 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> >> I recently applied updates to a CentOS 5 box running MySQL. I've discovered
> >> that the new version of openssl, 0.9.8e-36.0.1.el5_1
In article <55d2ed32.6040...@hogranch.com>,
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/18/2015 1:27 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> >> You should now be using mysql55 on CentOS-5, not mysql-5.0
> > That may well be the case, but isn't relevant to the point I'm making,
> > which is that something changed in openssl
Am 18.08.2015 um 10:55 schrieb t...@softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield):
> In article <55d2ed32.6040...@hogranch.com>,
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 8/18/2015 1:27 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>>> That may well be the case, but isn't relevant to the point I'm making,
>>> which is that something changed
> Maybe so, but still a side issue. Openssl 0.9.8e was recently updated.
> Some change in this update has broken something. I would like to understand
> what, and so ought the package maintainers. C5 isn't EOL until March 2017.
rpm -q --changelog openssl-0.9.8e. You weren't clear which version y
Am 18.08.2015 um 11:27 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
>
>> Maybe so, but still a side issue. Openssl 0.9.8e was recently updated.
>> Some change in this update has broken something. I would like to understand
>> what, and so ought the package maintainers. C5 isn't EOL until March 2017.
>
On 08/18/2015 02:32 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 18.08.2015 um 11:27 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
Maybe so, but still a side issue. Openssl 0.9.8e was recently updated.
Some change in this update has broken something. I would like to understand
what, and so ought the package maintai
In article <20150818092704.ga13...@users.sourceforge.net>,
wrote:
>
> > Maybe so, but still a side issue. Openssl 0.9.8e was recently updated.
> > Some change in this update has broken something. I would like to understand
> > what, and so ought the package maintainers. C5 isn't EOL until March
In article <013173c7-6aec-4c2d-9eb7-84c873c89...@googlemail.com>,
Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:27 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
> >
> >> Maybe so, but still a side issue. Openssl 0.9.8e was recently updated.
> >> Some change in this update has broken something. I would like
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 08/18/2015 03:47 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <55d2174f.70...@centos.org>,
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 08/17/2015 11:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 08/17/2015 10:57 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
I recently applied updates to a CentOS 5 box running MySQL. I've discovered
Did all this happen because I switched monitors? Or because I did all my
setup over ssh?
Otherwise, this is an FYI for other newbies who get confused by this like I
did.
Yesterday I set up a new centos 7 install, did updates, made all the config
tweaks I like to make, and rebooted at the end to
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Dave Burns wrote:
> Otherwise, this is an FYI for other newbies who get confused by this like I
> did.
> My caffeine-deprived response was to try q, c, and r, none of which got me
> unstuck. Forced to actually use my brain, I typed 1. More confusing text
> appea
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jason Warr wrote:
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 12:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been trying to read 80-udisks.rules with little success.
Would posting it (242 lines) be helpful?
After I plug in a drive,
is there a way to discover what udev rule was applied?
udevadm te
Hi All
We use CentOS 6.6 for our application. I have profiled the application
and find that we have a heavy requirement in terms of Disk writes. On an
average when our application operates at a certain load i can observe
that the disk writes / second is around 2 Mbps (Average).
The block siz
Hi,
I have installed CentOS 7 HVM kernel. I would like to convert it to CentOs
7 PV kernel.
When googled about it, I found that this can be done by following commands
yum install xen or yum install kernel-xen
But, when I tried the below commands, I am getting the error *"No package
kernel-xen a
On 8/18/2015 9:53 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
I have installed CentOS 7 HVM kernel. I would like to convert it to CentOs
7 PV kernel.
When googled about it, I found that this can be done by following commands
yum install xen or yum install kernel-xen
But, when I tried the below commands,
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry for the typo in the earlier mail.
I have PV-HVM of CentOS 7 & I need to convert it to PV kernel.
Basically here I am trying to see whether my PV_HVM kernel is vulenrable to
this issue given in the following link
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/212
In the above link
On 8/18/2015 10:37 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry for the typo in the earlier mail.
I have PV-HVM of CentOS 7 & I need to convert it to PV kernel.
Basically here I am trying to see whether my PV_HVM kernel is vulenrable to
this issue given in the following link
htt
Thanks for the reply.
If we want to have PV kernel for CentOs 7 , are there any guidelines to
follow?
How we can know before hand itself that this kernel is PV or HVM, without
installing kernel?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:27 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/18/2015 10:37 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dok
All modern kernels are PV compatible. You can take the same Linux image and
run it HVM or PV.
On 19 August 2015 at 09:19, Venkateswara Rao Dokku
wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> If we want to have PV kernel for CentOs 7 , are there any guidelines to
> follow?
> How we can know before hand it
I have taken the latest CentOS 7 base image, and after the installation &
customization I came to know that it is HVM.
So, I wanted to know before hand itself whether its HVM or PV. How can I do
it?
are there any specific steps we need to follow?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Andrew Holway
wr
24 matches
Mail list logo
