On 2015-08-06, Digimer
wrote:
> On 05/08/15 08:06 PM, Andrew Daviel wrote:
>>
>> I have Skype 2.1.0 running on CentOS 5, but it does not support
>> video.
>>
>> At various times I have tried to install or run more recent versions
>> on CentOS 5 and CentOS 6, but generally they fail for some reas
Am 06.08.2015 um 04:59 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
>
> We have to modify the source code to remove the branding .. as I
> explained in the other post.
>
> BUT, I do want to point out that the CentOS Team has never said CentOS =
> RHEL.
>
> CentOS is a rebuild of RHEL source code, built in the order
I have two Canon printers a MF4720W and LBP7100Cw. Previously a PC
running CentOS 6 were able to print without problems via network.
Unfortunately the hard disk died and in replacing it, we also upgraded
to CentOS 7.
Now the problem is that a test print to either printers looks OK for
the first ha
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hello.
But what version is recommended to use ? RHEL release or ISC ? From RHEL is 9.8
and ISC 9.10...
-Mensagem original-
De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] Em nome de
Always Learning
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 6 de agosto de 2015 01:03
Para: CentOS maili
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:54:21PM +, Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote:
> But what version is recommended to use ? RHEL release or ISC ? From
> RHEL is 9.8 and ISC 9.10...
I suggest re-reading this whole thread.
Use the package that's provided by CentOS.
--
Jonathan Billings
Am 06.08.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Jonathan Billings :
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:54:21PM +, Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote:
>> But what version is recommended to use ? RHEL release or ISC ? From
>> RHEL is 9.8 and ISC 9.10...
>
> I suggest re-reading this whole thread.
and https://access.redh
On 08/05/2015 08:12 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
This is an old system with only IDE ports. There is an added
Highpoint raid card which is used only for the two extra IDE ports.
Why "extra"? Are there drives connected to this system other than the
two you're discussing for the software RAID set
On 8/6/2015 3:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 08/05/2015 08:12 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
This is an old system with only IDE ports. There is an added
Highpoint raid card which is used only for the two extra IDE ports.
Why "extra"? Are there drives connected to this system other than the
two
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to
> figure out what I need to do to get all the programs running again.
Sounds like a pain. I w
On 8/6/2015 4:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to
figure out what I need to do to get all the programs r
Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy :
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
>> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to
>> figure out what I need to do to get all
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/6/2015 4:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
>>> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, an
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Definitely a strange problem. I'm hoping that doing a new install onto
> these drives rather than trying to inherit the install used on the smaller
> drives will work better.
The CentOS installer, and parted, predate AF drives, so the
partit
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
>>> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data,
Am 06.08.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
>>> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and th
On 8/6/2015 4:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/6/2015 4:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
works, I can connect the old drive
On 8/6/2015 4:55 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 06.08.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Leon Fauster :
Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy :
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that
works, I can connect the old drive,
On 08/05/2015 10:23 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Nothing about hd0 or hd1 gets baked into the bootloader code. It's an
absolute reference to a physical drive at the moment in time the
command is made.
Is that true? If I have a system with two disks, where device.map
labels one as hd0 and the other
Am 06.08.2015 um 22:43 schrieb Chris Murphy :
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
>> Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds like a pain. I would just adapt the CentOS 6 program.log
>>> command
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/6/2015 4:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/6/2015 4:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey
wrote:
> Doing a new inst
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 10:23 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Nothing about hd0 or hd1 gets baked into the bootloader code. It's an
>> absolute reference to a physical drive at the moment in time the
>> command is made.
>
>
> Is that true? If I have a s
On 08/05/2015 04:41 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I do not know why there's a duplication of the install command.
...
: Running... ['/sbin/grub', '--batch', '--no-floppy',
'--device-map=/boot/grub/device.map']
: grub> device (hd0) /dev/vdb
: grub> root (hd0,1)
: grub> install --stage2=/bo
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Gordon Messmer
> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2015 10:23 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> Nothing about hd0 or hd1 gets baked into the bootloader code. It's an
>>> absolute reference to a physical drive at the moment in t
On 08/06/2015 02:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
stage 1 cannot point to another drive at all. It's sole purpose is to
find stage 2, which must be on the same drive. Stage 1.5 is optional,
and I've never seen it get used on Linux, mainly because in the time
of GRUB legacy, I never encountered an insta
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I might try nerfing the parted and grub stage 1 bootloaders on disk2,
> and see if the grub shell (which I should still get to from disk 1)
> will let me install grub directly on these two drives properly.
OK I did that and this works.
## At
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Now I get to look back at OP's first email and see
> if he did this exact same thing already, and whether we've come full
> circle.
Shit. He did.
All I can think of is that either the GRUB/BIOS device designations
are wrong (they should be (h
Hi!
Just wondering if anyone has this working ...
Centos-7 guest in VMware-10 host (on Windows-7 :-( )
Out of the box, shared folders and drag&drop do not work although X screen
resolution sensing is fine (ie xrandr reports the resolution of the host
screen as well as the peculiar screen optio
Bob Hepple writes:
> It's the shared folder that I would really like to get working. vmware-
> hgfsclient reports my share but there is no /mnt/hgfs directory. Also
> 'lsmod|grep hgfs' reports nothing.
>
also:
mount -t vmhgfs .host:/ /mnt/tmp
mount: unknown filesystem type 'vmhgfs'
... which
try modprobe vmhgfs
--
Eero
2015-08-07 6:53 GMT+03:00 Bob Hepple :
> Bob Hepple writes:
>
> > It's the shared folder that I would really like to get working. vmware-
> > hgfsclient reports my share but there is no /mnt/hgfs directory. Also
> > 'lsmod|grep hgfs' reports nothing.
> >
>
> also:
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
