Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 07/30/2015 08:00 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 30.07.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
>> On 07/30/2015 04:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> Because we do CR, CentOS users had access to the 6.7 updates a full 3
>>> days before anyone else made them available and CR was released less
>>> tha
Hi, folks,
CentOS 6.6 (well, just updated with CR). I have some xfs filesystems on
a RAID. They've been mounted with the option of defaults. Will it break
the whole thing if I now change that to inode64, or was that something
I needed to do when the fs was created, or is there some conversion I
On 8/4/2015 7:14 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi, folks,
CentOS 6.6 (well, just updated with CR). I have some xfs filesystems on
a RAID. They've been mounted with the option of defaults. Will it break
the whole thing if I now change that to inode64, or was that something
I needed to do when t
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/4/2015 7:14 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> CentOS 6.6 (well, just updated with CR). I have some xfs filesystems
>> on a RAID. They've been mounted with the option of defaults. Will it break
>> the whole thing if I now change that to inode64, or was that something
>>
- Original Message -
| John R Pierce wrote:
| > On 8/4/2015 7:14 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
| >>
| >> CentOS 6.6 (well, just updated with CR). I have some xfs filesystems
| >> on a RAID. They've been mounted with the option of defaults. Will it break
| >> the whole thing if I now change t
On 8/4/2015 12:47 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Some older 32-bit software will likely have problems addressing any content
outside of the 2^32 bit inode range. You will be able to see it, but reading
and writing said data will likely be problematic
The 99% of software that just does open,re
James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | John R Pierce wrote:
> | > On 8/4/2015 7:14 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> | >>
> | >> CentOS 6.6 (well, just updated with CR). I have some xfs filesystems
> | >> on a RAID. They've been mounted with the option of defaults. Will it
> break
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 07:06 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> CentOS Linux normally also follows the upstream dist tags, except for
> packages where we make changes, where we use .el6.centos on those to
> denote we have modified them.
I thought, mistakenly perhaps, that Centos = RHEL without the RHE
This is what I thought, too, and without all the RHEL-centricities such as RHN.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Always Learning
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 4:40 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] why no r
On 08/04/2015 02:40 PM, Always Learning wrote:
I thought, mistakenly perhaps, that Centos = RHEL without the RHEL
branding.
Why would Centos modify a RHEL package before offering the package to
its devoted and appreciative Centos users ?
To remove the RHEL branding?
___
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 15:12 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 02:40 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > I thought, mistakenly perhaps, that Centos = RHEL without the RHEL
> > branding.
> >
> > Why would Centos modify a RHEL package before offering the package to
> > its devoted and apprecia
On 08/05/2015 11:30 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> No. Johnny wrote
>
> "CentOS Linux normally also follows the upstream dist tags, except
> " for packages where we make changes, where we use .el6.centos on
> " those to denote we have modified them."
Yes, certain packages have to be modified to re
13 matches
Mail list logo
