On 28/06/15 03:06, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Hi Joseph,
> Well normal convention would be if you replace then the old one
> gets appended with .rpmsave, if you are not replacing then the new
> one gets appended with .rpmnew.
I'm also aware of this, but it's not what I need :)
> On the other hand,
On Sat, 2015-06-27 at 21:17 -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> > Since the latest update (may wrap here),
> > xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> > 04:16:01 PM EDT
> > xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64
Am 28.06.2015 um 01:59 schrieb Anand Buddhdev :
> In an RPM post-install script, is it possible to know the previous
> version number, and the new version number of a package if it's an update?
>
> I need to know this, because for a certain package, if updating from
> version 1.x to 2.x, I need to
On Sat, 2015-06-27 at 21:17 -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> > Since the latest update (may wrap here),
> > xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> > 04:16:01 PM EDT
> > xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64
On 6/27/2015 5:38 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Thanks Joseph. I am aware of this option, but it would be only a last
resort, because checking the format of the config file is error-prone.
why doesn't the config file have the version in it ? not having that
makes your whole system error prone.
Greetings,
I'm rebuilding a machine to function as a gateway/router to Verizon DSL.
It has two NICs eth0 and eth1 (static set to 192.168.1.1).
eth0 connects to the DSL modem.
I've setup Verizon DSL usine pppoe-setup, and it works.
I can connect from home machines to the server (192.168.1.1)
You need NAT setup on the server.
ZK
> On Jun 28, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm rebuilding a machine to function as a gateway/router to Verizon DSL.
>
> It has two NICs eth0 and eth1 (static set to 192.168.1.1).
>
> eth0 connects to the DSL modem.
>
> I've
Am 28.06.2015 um 20:50 schrieb Max Pyziur:
[ ... ]
I can't connect from the home machines directly to the Internet.
I have set
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
in /etc/sysctl.conf
I haven't setup the firewall yet (dangerous, I know) until I get the
connectivity working.
Part of the firewall setup (i
On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 14:50 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
> I haven't setup the firewall yet (dangerous, I know) until I get the
> connectivity working.
>
> I'm obviously overlooking some other configuration settings required for
> machines inside the network being able to connect through the
> gat
Am 28.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb John R Pierce :
> On 6/27/2015 5:38 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>> Thanks Joseph. I am aware of this option, but it would be only a last
>> resort, because checking the format of the config file is error-prone.
>
> why doesn't the config file have the version in it ?
On 28/06/15 17:50, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/27/2015 5:38 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>> Thanks Joseph. I am aware of this option, but it would be only a last
>> resort, because checking the format of the config file is error-prone.
>
> why doesn't the config file have the version in it ? not h
On 6/28/2015 2:26 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On 28/06/15 17:50, John R Pierce wrote:
why doesn't the config file have the version in it ? not having that
makes your whole system error prone.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. Version 1 of the package uses a config file that
looks like this:
system {
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:06:19 -0500
Chris Adams wrote:
> Now, if btrfs ever gets all the kinks worked out (and has a stable
> "fsck" for the corner cases), it integrates volume management into the
> filesystem, which makes some of the management easier. I used AdvFS on
> DEC/Compaq/HP Tru64 Unix
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Brian Miller wrote:
On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 14:50 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
I haven't setup the firewall yet (dangerous, I know) until I get the
connectivity working.
I'm obviously overlooking some other configuration settings required for
machines inside the network being a
On 29 June 2015 at 07:37, John R Pierce wrote:
> so a regex looking for "system:" vs "system {" should nicely delineate
> these. I dunno, I might even put that into the conversion utility and
> have it just quit if the file is already in the new format, and always run
> it.
>
+1 for the ide
On 06/28/2015 03:20 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 28.06.2015 um 20:50 schrieb Max Pyziur:
>
>
> Part of the firewall setup (iptables) is to configure masquerading.
> That's you issue, the missing masquerading of the traffic from the LAN
> hosts through the gateway.
>
>> I'm obviously overlooki
On 29/06/15 01:07, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> On 29 June 2015 at 07:37, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> so a regex looking for "system:" vs "system {" should nicely delineate
>> these. I dunno, I might even put that into the conversion utility and
>> have it just quit if the file is already in the ne
On 6/28/2015 3:49 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
I also seem to need to load
iptable_nat
nf_nat_ftp
via rc.local
Is this correct?
only if you're running some Linux build from the 1990s.
nothing on RHEL/CentOS should need anything in rc.local
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
___
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:54:07AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> This makes no sense to me. rEFInd dynamically discovers linux kernel
>> updates, it doesn't need any regular configuration file changes. Once
>> you configure it, it's a sta
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Max Pyziur
> Sent: den 28 juni 2015 20:50
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home
> server
>
> I'm rebuilding a machine to function
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
> Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:11
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home
> server
>
> > -Original Message-
>
On 6/28/2015 11:11 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
May I ask why you don't just use a made-for-the-purpose-distro like
Smoothwall to do this?
indeed, I use pfSense, running on a APU1D4 [1] router board as my
firewall, and a separate home server on a HP Microserver [2]. IMHO,
keeping the firewall functi
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:29
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home
> server
>
> On 6/28/2015 11:11 PM, Sorin
23 matches
Mail list logo
