- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "John R Pierce"
Aan: centos@centos.org
Verzonden: Vrijdag 12 juni 2015 07:38:38
Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + Dell Latitude E6420 laptop = thermal shutdown
On 6/12/2015 7:09 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>>
> I want to thank you for posting your installation exp
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "James Hogarth"
Aan: "CentOS mailing list"
Verzonden: Donderdag 11 juni 2015 19:59:39
Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs
On 11 Jun 2015 13:28, wrote:
>
>
>
> - Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> Van: "johan verm
Hi,
Its been a while since I did the last update post - so this one is going
to be a bit longer.
Distro
--
* Updates for CentOS Linux 5/6/7 : All updates from upstream are
released into the CentOS mirror network.
* Rolling ISO media for CentOS-7 for May 2015 was released :
http://lists.
On 12 Jun 2015 10:30, wrote:
>
> I can't believe I mist that.
>
> Running transaction
> Installeren :
1:NetworkManager-wifi-1.0.0-14.git20150121.b4ea599c.el7.x86_64
1/1
> Verifiëren :
1:NetworkManager-wifi-1.0
On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP,
> from MySQL.
i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the
bugs introduced by moz dev and their 'bells and whistles' when
they started try to get ahead of gaag
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Its been a while since I did the last update post - so this one is going
> to be a bit longer.
>
I'd like to let you know that the updates are appreciated. I think it
gives all of us on this list, and not others, a feel for what's happening.
mark
__
On 06/11/2015 10:13 AM, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
This issue looks to be related to iconv included in the package glibc !
Is that possible to downgrade glibc on a CentOS 6 ?
Hi all,
I would like to know if these troubles affect also other people, for
example, I can no longer connect to Sipe (Lyn
hello,
On 06/12/2015 07:20 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
<>
"Last few days in CentOS" is a great idea. thanks for you efforts.
i have a question regarding link...
> Tip: Did you know that we run a remote ipxe install service that allows
> you to install any CentOS version / release very easily ?
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On 06/11/2015 10:13 AM, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
This issue looks to be related to iconv included in the package glibc !
Is that possible to downgrade glibc on a CentOS 6 ?
All works fine for me with latest versions. Screenshots work aok.
You're f
On Fri, June 12, 2015 8:28 am, g wrote:
>
>
> On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP,
>> from MySQL.
>
> i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the
> bugs introduced by moz dev and their 'bells and
On 12/06/15 14:09, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Its been a while since I did the last update post - so this one is going
>> to be a bit longer.
>>
>
> I'd like to let you know that the updates are appreciated. I think it
> gives all of us on this list, and not other
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:42AM +0530, Sudhi wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the forum to ask this query. I was wondering how
> the CentOS making sure that it work with different architectures, machine
> models etc. Is there any team to do all these testing ?
This isn't for CentOS, but for RHE
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 03:12:43PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> I have not been able to enter the edit screen to edit the boot
> options and add inst.txt
It is 'inst.text'. Not 'inst.txt'.
Read this for setting up custom boot options to the installer:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Fri, June 12, 2015 8:28 am, g wrote:
>> On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP,
>>> from MySQL.
>>
>> i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the
>> bugs introduced by moz
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/06/15 14:09, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> Its been a while since I did the last update post - so this one is
>>> going to be a bit longer.
>>>
>>
>> I'd like to let you know that the updates are appreciated. I think it
>> gives all of us on
On 06/11/2015 10:35 PM, g wrote:
hi jd1008,
you do have your problems. ;-)
On 06/12/2015 09:40 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Hi All,
smplayer has no mailing list.
I tried to register at
http://forum.smplayer.info/ucp.php?mode=register
but the capchas are so incredibly impossible to discern
that I gave u
On 06/11/2015 11:06 PM, g wrote:
On 06/12/2015 12:00 AM, g wrote:
On 06/12/2015 09:40 PM, jd1008 wrote:
does that look correct to you?
btw. have you run yum or yumex lately?
ria, when ever i do, i have to reset my time and date.
curious if you have same problem.
I have been running yum
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:16:28AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> That said, I wonder if centos has a counterpart to fedup,
> so that I can upgrade to centos 7.5.
AFAIK, nothing that's supported. There's the tool available here:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool
... but it can leave
On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote:
On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP,
from MySQL.
i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the
bugs introduced by moz dev and their 'bells and whistles' when
they
On 06/12/2015 10:32 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:16:28AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
That said, I wonder if centos has a counterpart to fedup,
so that I can upgrade to centos 7.5.
AFAIK, nothing that's supported. There's the tool available here:
http://wiki.centos.org/Tip
On 06/12/2015 09:03 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 03:12:43PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I have not been able to enter the edit screen to edit the boot
options and add inst.txt
It is 'inst.text'. Not 'inst.txt'.
Read this for setting up custom boot options to the installer:
Thanx for the link to the repo file.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
jd1008 wrote:
> On 06/12/2015 10:32 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:16:28AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>>> That said, I wonder if centos has a counterpart to fedup,
>>> so that I can upgrade to centos 7.5.
>> AFAIK, nothing that's supported. There's the tool available here:
>>
jd1008 wrote:
> On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote:
>> On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP,
>>> from MySQL.
>> i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the
>> bugs introduced by moz dev and their 'bel
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:55:47AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> The most offensive problems of using browsers is that
> they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts
> spy on your entire storage contents.
Huh? You've been misinformed. Certainly there have been exploits
against browsers
On 06/12/2015 11:25 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote:
On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP,
from MySQL.
i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the
bugs
On 06/12/2015 11:57 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:55:47AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
The most offensive problems of using browsers is that
they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts
spy on your entire storage contents.
Huh? You've been misinformed. Cer
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist
> that is not viewable by the user.
> The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed
> entries.
You mean the noscript.mandatory about:config entry? I looked at it on
my comp
On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist
that is not viewable by the user.
The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed
entries.
You mean the noscript.mandatory
On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist
>>> that is not viewable by the user.
>>> The whitelist tab does NOT list the
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22:13PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> No Jonathan.
> I mean websites whitelisted and not exposed in the
> whitelist tab.
I'd certainly like to see proof of this claim.
Are you sure you're not thinking about Adblock Plus and its "bribe us
and we'll whitelist you" scheme?
--
On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist
that is not viewable by the user.
The
On 06/12/2015 12:36 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22:13PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
No Jonathan.
I mean websites whitelisted and not exposed in the
whitelist tab.
I'd certainly like to see proof of this claim.
Are you sure you're not thinking about Adblock Plus and its
On 06/12/2015 11:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 10:32 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:16:28AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
That said, I wonder if centos has a counterpart to fedup,
so that I can upgrade to centos 7.5.
AFAIK, nothing that's support
Am 13.06.2015 um 20:45 schrieb jd1008:
That's depressing !!
Reason I asked is because the centos7 release DVD does not
support my NVIDIA Corporation G98M [Quadro NVS 160M] (rev a1)
card.
It is incredibly strange that it is supported by Centos 6.4
which installed from DVD without a hitch.
Can
On 06/12/2015 09:03 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 03:12:43PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I have not been able to enter the edit screen to edit the boot
options and add inst.txt
It is 'inst.text'. Not 'inst.txt'.
Read this for setting up custom boot options to the installer:
On 06/12/2015 12:46 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 13.06.2015 um 20:45 schrieb jd1008:
That's depressing !!
Reason I asked is because the centos7 release DVD does not
support my NVIDIA Corporation G98M [Quadro NVS 160M] (rev a1)
card.
It is incredibly strange that it is supported by Centos 6
Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
> My system clock is running on Standard Mountain time, and so is
> my HW clock.
> I do not set the HW clock to Universal time.
> Why is this a problem?
> My clock is just a few seconds skewed from actual time,
> depending on the system load.
Here's the timestamp of
On 06/13/2015 09:55 AM, jd1008 wrote:
The most offensive problems of using browsers is that
they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts
spy on your entire storage contents.
Neither javascript nor Java applets can access the local filesystem.
Applets launched by JNLP can do so
On 06/13/2015 11:11 AM, jd1008 wrote:
All your browsing history, all cookies ...etc are open books
as far as many javascripts are concerned.
Javascript can use CSS attributes to see if you've visited a specific
URL, which is unfortunate, but that's a long way from saying that your
history is
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts.
> The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of
> javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per web site).
> In the older versions, I would dlete all entries in
On 06/12/2015 12:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
My system clock is running on Standard Mountain time, and so is
my HW clock.
I do not set the HW clock to Universal time.
Why is this a problem?
My clock is just a few seconds skewed from actual time,
depending on the s
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:04:03PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> My computer clock is only seconds ahead of my phone,
> which is timed to the cellular provider's ntp server.
Your clock is an entire day ahead of your cell phone, unless you're
emailing us from the future.
If you are emailing from the fut
jd1008 wrote:
> On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist
> th
On 06/12/2015 12:58 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/13/2015 09:55 AM, jd1008 wrote:
The most offensive problems of using browsers is that
they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts
spy on your entire storage contents.
Neither javascript nor Java applets can access the loca
On 06/12/2015 01:01 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/13/2015 11:11 AM, jd1008 wrote:
All your browsing history, all cookies ...etc are open books
as far as many javascripts are concerned.
Javascript can use CSS attributes to see if you've visited a specific
URL, which is unfortunate, but tha
On 06/12/2015 12:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
Mark, please be aware that noscr
On 06/12/2015 01:01 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/13/2015 11:11 AM, jd1008 wrote:
All your browsing history, all cookies ...etc are open books
as far as many javascripts are concerned.
Javascript can use CSS attributes to see if you've visited a specific
URL, which is unfortunate, but tha
On 06/12/2015 01:03 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts.
The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of
javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per web site).
In th
On 06/12/2015 01:06 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:04:03PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
My computer clock is only seconds ahead of my phone,
which is timed to the cellular provider's ntp server.
Your clock is an entire day ahead of your cell phone, unless you're
emailing us f
Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
> 1 day ahead??
> According to whose clock??
Again, here's a Date: header from your email:
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:22:43 -0600
--
Chris Adams
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/
Am 13.06.2015 um 21:22 schrieb jd1008:
On 06/12/2015 01:06 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:04:03PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
My computer clock is only seconds ahead of my phone,
which is timed to the cellular provider's ntp server.
Your clock is an entire day ahead of your
On 06/13/2015 12:07 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I think you are simply repeating you have learned
NOT by actually knowing the code and implemetation
the way the developer of the product knew it. Your info
is both dated and part of the marketing blurbs.
So the published security model of two different Fre
On 06/12/2015 01:24 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 13.06.2015 um 21:22 schrieb jd1008:
On 06/12/2015 01:06 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:04:03PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
My computer clock is only seconds ahead of my phone,
which is timed to the cellular provider's ntp
Am 12.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb jd1008:
That mail you were sending right now shows following date header
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:22:43 -0600
Do you still insist that this is the right local time?
Alexander
I believe it is fixed.
It indeed is fixed, thanks.
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:28:44
On Fri, June 12, 2015 2:03 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>> I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts.
>> The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of
>> javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per we
On 06/13/2015 12:11 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Why do you make such statements without knowing the intrinsics???
How in tarnation do you explain this:
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com
That site doesn't say anything about Java or Javascript. Or cookies for
that m
On 6/13/2015 12:11 PM, jd1008 wrote:
How in tarnation do you explain this:
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com
I see nothing there but a list of the status of that specific domain,
which google has analyzed from their spidering activity, there's nothing
t
On Sat, Jun 10, 2062 at 01:16:03PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> On 06/12/2015 01:01 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >As far as cookies go, you're even further from the truth. A script can
> >only access cookies whose domain matches the origin of the script.
>
> Your final line is not true.
Its technically
On 06/12/2015 01:27 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/13/2015 12:07 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I think you are simply repeating you have learned
NOT by actually knowing the code and implemetation
the way the developer of the product knew it. Your info
is both dated and part of the marketing blurbs.
So
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 10:13 +0200, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know if these troubles affect also other people, for
> example,
> now I've just discovered that it was no
> longer possible to take screenshots with gnome-screenshot, I always
> receive an error message
On 06/12/2015 01:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/13/2015 12:11 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Why do you make such statements without knowing the intrinsics???
How in tarnation do you explain this:
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com
That site doesn't say anything
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 03:43:11PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> Its technically true, however, XSS attacks can get around that
> restriction, which is why you saw so much malware posted on a site
> like googleusercontent.com. Sites that allow users to upload content
> are always being used to
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 01:50:13PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> >>Malware is installed where it can be executed.
> >>Since that is the case, what makes you think JS cannot
> >>access your browsing history??
> >
> >You're connecting unrelated things.
> >_
> No!! I am not connecting unrelated things.
> Nos
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 10:55 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> The most offensive problems of using browsers is that
> they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts
> spy on your entire storage contents.
> I had asked a java developer at Sun Microsystems about
> what Sun means when it says th
On Fri, June 12, 2015 2:56 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 10:55 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
>> The most offensive problems of using browsers is that
>> they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts
>> spy on your entire storage contents.
>> I had asked a java devel
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:11 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> For example, all browsers execute the javascript called
> googleusercontent.com
>
> Please read this page:
> http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com
In FF I use Ad Block Plus to block the world's biggest spying
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 13:27 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Please, tell me how wrong I am (who are actually whitelisted would be
> really good to know).
Everyone knows its the USA government's preferred spy and monitoring
sites.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the Eu
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:40 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> You can also try adblock edge which circimvents the bribe :)
:-(
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/
**This addon has been discontinued**
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the European Unio
On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing
somebody's else code on your computer.
your computer is *ALWAYS* executing someone elses code, unless you wrote
every line of code in it, including the BIOS and the firmware of all the
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:09 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:11 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
>> For example, all browsers execute the javascript called
>> googleusercontent.com
>>
>> Please read this page:
>> http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing
>> somebody's else code on your computer.
>
>
> your computer is *ALWAYS* executing someone elses code, unless you wrote
> every lin
On Jun 12, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> It is my understanding that Java and Javascript are different;
They’re as different as India and Indiana.
> Java is dangerous whilst Javascript is (hopefully) harmless.
That’s a pretty unsophisticated way to look at it.
*Ideally*, Java i
On 06/12/2015 02:16 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:40 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
You can also try adblock edge which circimvents the bribe :)
:-(
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/
**This addon has been discontinued**
Weird
I just installed
Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:11 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
>> For example, all browsers execute the javascript called
>> googleusercontent.com
>>
>> Please read this page:
>> http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com
>
> In FF I use Ad Block Plus to
On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing
somebody's else code on your computer.
your computer is *ALWAYS* executing someone e
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing
somebody's else code on
On 06/12/2015 03:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are ex
Mate is not in the repos.
mate-desktop.org has no packages for rhel or centos.
How can I install it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:30:43 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> Mate is not in the repos.
> mate-desktop.org has no packages for rhel or centos.
>
> How can I install it.
yum install epel-release
yum groupinstall "MATE Desktop"
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
__
jd1008 schreef:
Mate is not in the repos.
mate-desktop.org has no packages for rhel or centos.
How can I install it
It's in epel repository.
yum install epel-release
yum groupinstall "X Window System"
yum groupinstall mate
Thats what I use on C7
Greetings
__
On 6/12/2015 1:16 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:40 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>You can also try adblock edge which circimvents the bribe:)
:-(
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/
**This addon has been discontinued**
I switched to uBlock awhile ago.
On Fri, June 12, 2015 4:16 pm, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2015 03:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 14:38 -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> The main point of blocking JavaScript is that it throws a spike strip
> in the path of many other types of attacks. For instance, a Flash
> exploit often relies on some JS probing code to run before it can run,
> so blocking JS provide
*
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 14:43 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2015 02:16 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:40 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> >
> >> You can also try adblock edge which circimvents the bribe :)
> > :-(
> >
> > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/adb
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 16:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Yeah. I never enable google-analytics. When I want to see a website
> that's got a ton of inclusions, I selectively temporarily enable only
> what I think I'll need (which of those stupid things has the text?
> which the pic?), and whe
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 14:54 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> The more you know, the less you trust :) :)
> Read the article:
> http://www.kaspersky.com/about/news/virus/2015/equation-group-the-crown-creator-of-cyber-espionage
Seems their concerns relate to Micro$oft Windoze systems. Luckily I use
superior
On 06/12/2015 03:39 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
yum install epel-release
yum groupinstall "MATE Desktop"
yum groupinstall "MATE Desktop"
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, fs-snapshot, refresh-packagekit, security
Setting up Group Process
Repository testing-1.1-devtools-6 is listed more than once in the
On 06/12/2015 03:42 PM, johan.vermeulen7 wrote:
yum install epel-release
yum groupinstall "X Window System"
yum groupinstall mate
epel-release is already installed.
Warning: Group x11 does not have any packages.
No packages in any requested group available to install or update
Warning: Gro
On 06/12/2015 04:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 4:16 pm, jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 03:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 6/12/2
On 06/12/2015 05:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
*
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 14:43 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 06/12/2015 02:16 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:40 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
You can also try adblock edge which circimvents the bribe :)
:-(
https://addons.mozilla.
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:25:00 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> Warning: Group MATE Desktop does not exist.
> No packages in any requested group available to install or update
Since the MATE Desktop group does exist in epel (I just checked and it hasn't
gone away), you have other issues that you should proba
On 06/12/2015 06:45 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:25:00 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
Warning: Group MATE Desktop does not exist.
No packages in any requested group available to install or update
Since the MATE Desktop group does exist in epel (I just checked and it hasn't
gone away), y
On 06/12/2015 06:45 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:25:00 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
Warning: Group MATE Desktop does not exist.
No packages in any requested group available to install or update
Since the MATE Desktop group does exist in epel (I just checked and it hasn't
gone away), y
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:49:53 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> I am running Centos 6.4
> Could that be the issue?
That's the issue. MATE is available for Centos 7. For an equivalent
experience with Centos 6, install the Gnome Desktop. In other words, you don't
need MATE with Centos 6.
--
MELVILLE THEA
On 06/12/2015 01:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2015 2:03 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts.
The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of
javascrits t
Does anyone know what are all the centos 6 reppos?
I have:
CentOS-Base.repo
CentOS-Debuginfo.repo
CentOS-fasttrack.repo
CentOS-Media.repo
CentOS-Vault.repo
devtools.repo
epel.repo
epel-testing.repo
rpmfusion-free-updates.repo
rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo
rpmf
When I was running mate on another computer, I would log off
or shutdown, and power up and login again and mate
would restore all the gui apps in all the workspaces.
Gnome does not do that.
Also, I do not have a way to upgrade to Centos 7 because
1. graphic installation fails (as I have posted h
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:49 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> I am running Centos 6.4
> Could that be the issue?
I'm using C 6.6
Try: yum update
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cen
On 06/12/2015 07:22 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:49 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I am running Centos 6.4
Could that be the issue?
I'm using C 6.6
Try: yum update
I did. Says nothing marked for update.
To wit:
# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, fs-snapshot, refres
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
