tl;dr - a renamed dummy interface is not persisting across reboots on Cent6.
I have a situation where I need to rename a dummy interface on my system.
I have a total of 3 dummy interfaces:
dummy0
dummy1
adummy0
I've been doing some puppet testing in a vbox VM to get this all
sorted out to deplo
On 24/05/2015 15:36, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm trying use check_memcached.pl to monitor a couple of memcached services
running on two ports.
I have my command definition setup like this:
# 'check_memcached' command definition
define command {
command_name check_memcached
command_lin
Am 18.05.2015 um 18:25 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
> On 05/16/2015 10:23 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Well, the destination is not in my realm (different provider). Before
>> contacting them I want to be sure that my system is not causing this.
>> So far i just see a "tcp retransmission" while trying to
Hi, folks,
The other admin updated torque without testing it on one machine, and
we had Issues. The first I knew was when a user reported qstat
returning
socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
qstat: cannot connect to server (null)
On 05/27/2015 09:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
>The other admin updated torque without testing it on one machine, and
> we had Issues. The first I knew was when a user reported qstat
> returning
> socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
> socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
> socket_co
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
>The other admin updated torque without testing it on one machine, and
> we had Issues. The first I knew was when a user reported qstat
> returning
> socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
> socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
> socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 09:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Hi, folks,
>>
>>The other admin updated torque without testing it on one machine, and
>> we had Issues. The first I knew was when a user reported qstat
>> returning
>> socket_connect_unix failed: 15137
>> socket_connect_u
On Wed, May 27, 2015 9:46 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/27/2015 09:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Hi, folks,
>>>
>>>The other admin updated torque without testing it on one machine,
>>> and
>>> we had Issues. The first I knew was when a user reported qstat
>>>
Mark, You might really want to compile torque from source (into an RPM
if you'd like) and redistribute that. Every version is a little wonky
and those of us that use(d) it often will poke around until we find a
version / patch-set that makes us happy and stick with that for a bit.
It's not an exact
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 9:46 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2015 09:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Johnny. I *just* posted an apology, that I realized it was an
>> EPEL issue Talk about an "upgrade disaster"! I think the othe
On Wed, May 27, 2015 10:55 am, Zachary Giles wrote:
> Mark, You might really want to compile torque from source (into an RPM
> if you'd like) and redistribute that. Every version is a little wonky
> and those of us that use(d) it often will poke around until we find a
> version / patch-set that ma
On Wed, May 27, 2015 10:46 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 9:46 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/27/2015 09:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Johnny. I *just* posted an apology, that I realized it was an
>>>
Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything saying
the problems noted here have been fixed.
thanks,
-chuck
--
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
On 05/27/2015 11:49 AM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>
> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything saying
> the problems noted here have been fixed.
Theoretically, the language problems (except for Russian) and this issue
are fixed
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 10:55 am, Zachary Giles wrote:
>> Mark, You might really want to compile torque from source (into an RPM
>> if you'd like) and redistribute that. Every version is a little wonky
>> and those of us that use(d) it often will poke around until we find a
>
Chuck Campbell wrote:
> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>
> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything
> saying the problems noted here have been fixed.
Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I thought I remembered folks here
complaining about it breaking lang
m.roth@5-cent.usschreef:
Chuck Campbell wrote:
> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>
> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything
> saying the problems noted here have been fixed.
Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I thought I remembered folks here
compla
johan.vermeulen7 wrote:
> m.roth@5-cent.usschreef:
> Chuck Campbell wrote:
>> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>>
>> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything
>> saying the problems noted here have been fixed.
>
> Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I though
On 5/22/2015 5:01 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:20:15 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Any suggestions as to where to go from here?
What is your audio device? Are you sure it's supported?
(The lshw command will tell you what hardware you have.)
Supported by what? OS, or mpg123?
I
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 5/22/2015 5:01 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:20:15 -0400
>> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> Any suggestions as to where to go from here?
>> What is your audio device? Are you sure it's supported?
>>
>> (The lshw command will tell you what hardware you have.)
>
On 5/27/2015 4:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/22/2015 5:01 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:20:15 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Any suggestions as to where to go from here?
What is your audio device? Are you sure it's supported?
(The lshw command will tell y
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Frank Even
wrote:
> tl;dr - a renamed dummy interface is not persisting across reboots on Cent6.
>
> I have a situation where I need to rename a dummy interface on my system.
>
> I have a total of 3 dummy interfaces:
>
> dummy0
> dummy1
> adummy0
>
> I've been doin
Frank Even wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Frank Even
> wrote:
>> tl;dr - a renamed dummy interface is not persisting across reboots on
>> Cent6.
>>
>> I have a situation where I need to rename a dummy interface on my
>> system.
>>
>> I have a total of 3 dummy interfaces:
>>
>> dummy0
>>
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, wrote:
> Frank Even wrote:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Frank Even
>> wrote:
>>> tl;dr - a renamed dummy interface is not persisting across reboots on
>>> Cent6.
>>>
>>> I have a situation where I need to rename a dummy interface on my
>>> system.
>>>
>>>
Hi all,
After installing CentOS 7 and restart it, it always promptd
"4m[terminated]". What does this prompt mean? Does it will affect normal OS
functions?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards
Nan Xiao
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.c
25 matches
Mail list logo
