On 25/05/15 15:10, Kirk Bocek wrote:
> The list keeps growing.
oh boy, wait until people hear about ssmtp...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> On May 25, 2015, at 01:10, Kirk Bocek wrote:
>
> I'll reinstall chrony. But there *are* places I've needed to use nodeps.
> Mostly to manage inter-repo package incompatibilities.
You should look into the yum priorities option to ensure packages from
different repos don't step on each other,
On 5/25/2015 4:40 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On May 25, 2015, at 01:10, Kirk Bocek wrote:
I'll reinstall chrony. But there *are* places I've needed to use nodeps. Mostly
to manage inter-repo package incompatibilities.
You should look into the yum priorities option to ensure packages from
I am out of the office until 28/05/2015.
Estaré ausente de la oficina, para cualquier apoyo que necesites favor de
contactar a Jose Manuel Flores Dublan
Email: jflor...@iusacell.com.mx
Cel: 5530300533
Note: This is an automated response to your message "CentOS Digest, Vol
124, Issue 25"
On Mon, May 25, 2015 12:10 am, Kirk Bocek wrote:
>
>
> On May 24, 2015 4:46:18 PM PDT, Jonathan Billings
> wrote:
>>> On May 24, 2015, at 18:24, Kirk Bocek wrote:
>>>
>>> So:
>>>
>>> $rpm -e --nodeps chrony
>>
>>No. Bad.
>>
>
> Okay, okay! I'll go on the paper.
>
> I'll reinstall chrony. But the
I have two instances of an openldap-2.4.39 server running with syncrepl
in a master-master replication setup. These are Centos 7.1 test servers
which have been running for over 2 months now with no problems. Partly
the good behavior of the LDAP servers is due to very little exercise.
Yesterday
On 05/25/2015 07:48 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote:
>
>
> On 5/25/2015 4:40 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>> On May 25, 2015, at 01:10, Kirk Bocek wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll reinstall chrony. But there *are* places I've needed to use
>>> nodeps. Mostly to manage inter-repo package incompatibilities.
>> You shoul
On May 25, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote:
> It usually happens when I've wanted to change versions of the same software
> between repos and that software has been compiled differently. Usually
> audio-visual software. Yum install triggers a conflict and yum uninstall on
> the older packag
On 5/25/2015 12:12 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On May 25, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote:
It usually happens when I've wanted to change versions of the same software
between repos and that software has been compiled differently. Usually
audio-visual software. Yum install triggers a co
The bigger issue is a project like MythTV being targeted at the
bleeding edge like Fedora while I want to stay on the stable edge with
CentOS. I've had to deal with this for years. MythTV will eventually
move on to a library or a tool not supported by the base CentOS
install and it will be a battl
Has the "selinux --disabled" line for kickstart files been depreciated?
My CentOS 6.6 kickstart file contains the line:
selinux --disabled
After the install completes, SELinux is enabled instead of disabled.
/etc/selinux/config contains "SELINUX=enforcing" instead of "SELINUX=disabled
On 05/26/2015 08:32 AM, Charlie Brune wrote:
Has the "selinux --disabled" line for kickstart files been depreciated?
My CentOS 6.6 kickstart file contains the line:
selinux --disabled
After the install completes, SELinux is enabled instead of disabled.
I believe this has been the
On 05/25/2015 10:39 AM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
My first question: Should the first sequence of commands with the
slapadd command work or am I expecting behavior that is not supported?
You might want to ask on the openldap list. I think the short answer
is: slapadd doesn't write data required fo
To set selinux to permissive or disabled mode during a kickstart
installation, add the sed -i -e 's/\(^SELINUX=\).*$/\1permissive/'
/etc/selinux/config command to the %post section of the kickstart file.
Making sure to replace "permissive" with the required selinux mode.
-- https://bugzilla.redha
If the decision was made around the 4.8 time period to not fix the problem,
why in v6 is it still listed in the manual as being a valid option?
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Andrew Holway
wrote:
> To set selinux to permissive or disabled mode during a kickstart
> installation, add the sed -i
Which manual?
This could actually be the root of the issue.
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7910
On 26 May 2015 at 07:56, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
> If the decision was made around the 4.8 time period to not fix the problem,
> why in v6 is it still listed in the manual as being a valid option?
16 matches
Mail list logo
