[CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Tim Semeijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear, Recently I have noticed that on all my CentOS machines the CentOS-Base.repo file seems to have been modified resulting in all baseurl= lines being commented out. Did I miss something that was planned or is this a bug? Best regards, - -- Ti

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 24.05.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Tim Semeijn: Dear, Recently I have noticed that on all my CentOS machines the CentOS-Base.repo file seems to have been modified resulting in all baseurl= lines being commented out. That is the case for a very long time, even if it hasn't be the case all the ti

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Tim Semeijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Weird, as all CentOS machines under my control are suddenly giving the baseurl of Base repo not found error since this morning. Could be that mirrorlist is leading but all other options I found online to debug the error message seem to indicate that (u

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/24/2015 07:48 AM, Tim Semeijn wrote: > Weird, as all CentOS machines under my control are suddenly giving the > baseurl of Base repo not found error since this morning. Could be that > mirrorlist is leading but all other options I found online to debug > the error message seem to indicate tha

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 24.05.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes: On 05/24/2015 07:48 AM, Tim Semeijn wrote: Weird, as all CentOS machines under my control are suddenly giving the baseurl of Base repo not found error since this morning. Could be that mirrorlist is leading but all other options I found online to deb

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Tim Semeijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for your replies. > curl "http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=6&arch=x86_64&repo=os"; Same empty result here. Opening the link on my computer shows 10 mirrors as expected, but server side nothing. - -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network pgp 0x5B8

[CentOS] specify port on check_memcached.pl

2015-05-24 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hey guys, I'm trying use check_memcached.pl to monitor a couple of memcached services running on two ports. I have my command definition setup like this: # 'check_memcached' command definition define command { command_name check_memcached command_line $USER1$/check_memcached.pl -H $HOSTADDR

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Tim Semeijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It looks like the culprit is IPv6 according to a post on the CentOS Mirrors mailing list (http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/2015-May/008847.html): > Hello, > > mirrorlist.centos.org currently doesn't correctly answer on IPv6 - > The req

Re: [CentOS] specify port on check_memcached.pl

2015-05-24 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 24.05.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Tim Dunphy: Hey guys, [ snip ] CRITICAL ERROR - Can not connect to '162.243.60.6' on port 0 I thought I could specify the command in the service definition like this: check_memcached!web1.example.com!11211 To reproduced the command as it's executed on the co

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 24.05.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Tim Semeijn: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It looks like the culprit is IPv6 according to a post on the CentOS Mirrors mailing list (http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/2015-May/008847.html): Bingo. [root@msg ~]# curl -6 "http://mirr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out

2015-05-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/24/2015 10:00 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 24.05.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Tim Semeijn: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> It looks like the culprit is IPv6 according to a post on the CentOS >> Mirrors mailing list >> (http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/201

[CentOS] mod_suPHP

2015-05-24 Thread Bob Puff
I have been trying to get mod_suPHP working on Centos 7's httpd, just as I've done with versions 5 and 6. I found a couple RPMs that others have built, and I even compiled suPHP from source, and got a successful compile. Each time, I can see with phpinfo() that the mod_suPHP module did indeed loa

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/23/2015 11:22 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: Kirk Bocek wrote on 24/05/2015 04:37: So I've built my first CentOS 7 host and am learning all the new ways of doing things. I setup and enabled ntpd but after a reboot I get: In CentOS 7 is bettere to use chrony, here's an howto http://linoxide.com

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:41:43 -0700 Kirk Bocek wrote: > It's just not running at boot time. Come on, I can't be the only one > here to setup time services! Every Centos 7 installation that I've done so far installs and activates chrony by default, without any particular action required on my par

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 05/24/2015 11:41 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: to activate your selected daemon. I just used the new systemd commands, thinking that would be enough. So I tried that and rebooted. Nope, same problem: chronyd and ntpd both use UDP port 123, so each will terminate the other when it starts. If both a

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/24/2015 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 05/24/2015 11:41 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: to activate your selected daemon. I just used the new systemd commands, thinking that would be enough. So I tried that and rebooted. Nope, same problem: chronyd and ntpd both use UDP port 123, so each will

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Fred Smith
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 03:24:59PM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > > On 5/24/2015 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >On 05/24/2015 11:41 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: > >>to activate your selected daemon. I just used the new systemd commands, > >>thinking that would be enough. So I tried that and rebooted.

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Jonathan Billings
> On May 24, 2015, at 18:24, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > So: > > $rpm -e --nodeps chrony No. Bad. Just disable the service. Breaking your rpm database will just lead to pain down the road. Disabling the service will maintain the integrity of the package dependencies, and most likely a later yum up

Re: [CentOS] mod_suPHP

2015-05-24 Thread Steven Stern
On 05/24/2015 12:20 PM, Bob Puff wrote: > I have been trying to get mod_suPHP working on Centos 7's httpd, just as I've > done with versions 5 and 6. I found a couple RPMs that others have built, and > I even compiled suPHP from source, and got a successful compile. Each time, I > can see with ph

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 05/24/2015 03:24 PM, Kirk Bocek wrote: Disable chronyd. So: $rpm -e --nodeps chrony chrony has dependencies with anaconda and initial-setup. No, not that I can tell... # rpm -q --whatrequires chrony Either way, don't use --nodeps. Just don't. If you break dependencies, you're going

Re: [CentOS] Systemd

2015-05-24 Thread Kirk Bocek
On May 24, 2015 4:46:18 PM PDT, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On May 24, 2015, at 18:24, Kirk Bocek wrote: >> >> So: >> >> $rpm -e --nodeps chrony > >No. Bad. > Okay, okay! I'll go on the paper. I'll reinstall chrony. But there *are* places I've needed to use nodeps. Mostly to manage inter-r