Hi guys,
I have multiple IPs bound to my Centos 6.6 box but I can only telnet to one
IP. Any ideas on what to do? I've searched the internet so far with every
keyword I can think of to no avail. I can see that postfix is only
listening on the first IP and to localhost. The IP I cannot smtp to is o
From: centos-boun...@centos.org on behalf of Mike
McKoy
Sent: 20 May 2015 11:41
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] I Have Multiple Ips But Can Only Telnet to One Interface. Not
the subinterface. How to Fix?
Hi guys,
I have multiple IPs bound
From: centos-boun...@centos.org on behalf of Mike
McKoy
Sent: 20 May 2015 11:41
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] I Have Multiple Ips But Can Only Telnet to One Interface. Not
the subinterface. How to Fix?
Hi guys,
I have multiple IPs bound to
Hi there matt,
they are supposed to be different IPs. One is a newsletter ip and the other
a forum. I need to keep the mail traffic Separate so that member messages
don't go to spam. I've searched all over and can't find anything in the
CENTOS forums or on the net which corresponds to this. i just
That's OK... any suggestions? I thought this was a firewall issue but I
have no idea how to isolate & open ports on a subinterface. I bet the
solution is simpler than remembering my own name... smh
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.n
The subject line is deliberate.
It looks like firefox 38 is infliting a rerun of
http://marc.info/?l=centos&m=141288474630498&w=2
upon us. Addons are downloaded into /tmp, but never installed. Not even
Install addon from file works.
Going back to ff31. Grumbling ...
_
On 20/05/2015 11:41, Mike McKoy wrote:
[root@mail1 log]# netstat -plnt |grep :25
tcp 0 0 172.30.1.113:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 18800/master
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 18800/master
You are not listening on 172.30.1.65 you need to edit the postfix config
to listen on either 0.0.0.0 or both
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:39:15PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> The subject line is deliberate.
>
> It looks like firefox 38 is infliting a rerun of
> http://marc.info/?l=centos&m=141288474630498&w=2
upstream is aware of it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221368
Tru
--
Tru
Hi trish, i have postfix configured to listen on that ip... it's still not
listening.
see below:
# Note: you need to stop/start Postfix when this parameter changes.
#
#inet_interfaces = all
#inet_interfaces = $myhostname
#inet_interfaces = $myhostname, localhost
inet_interfaces = 172.30.1.65
# E
There must be something else keeping the instance of postfix from listening
on that IP & port. When I set the config to localhost it only sends out
using the main postfix instance and it uses the wrong IP to do so. I'm
thinking something at the CENTOS level. I cannot get the port to open
on 172.30.
On 05/20/2015 10:34 AM, Mike McKoy wrote:
There must be something else keeping the instance of postfix from listening on that
IP & port I'm thinking something at the CENTOS level. I cannot get the port
to open on 172.30.1.65 regardless of what I try.
Again here is the config I have in /etc
Yes they are being used. There is a command used to create the instance and
then I must edit the config files manually. If I put localhost in the
secondary instance it binds. Postfix is not the problem. They are saying
this is at the OS level which is why I need your help. How do I open the
post fo
On 05/20/2015 10:47 AM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:39:15PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
>>
>> The subject line is deliberate.
>>
>> It looks like firefox 38 is infliting a rerun of
>> http://marc.info/?l=centos&m=141288474630498&w=2
>
> upstream is aware of it:
> https://bugzi
On 19/05/15 13:07, Kai Bojens wrote:
> On 17-05-15 10:35:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> https doesn't improve your privacy in this application.
>
> No, but it makes it a little bit harder for third parties
> to gather all these information. That seems to be a worthy
> goal for me.
We can likel
15 matches
Mail list logo
