On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Kahlil Hodgson
wrote:
> The fedora spins SIG
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_SIG?rd=SIGs/Spins
> created/assembled a whole bunch of tools for doing just that. I used
> such machinery to do pretty much the same as what you are a number of
> years ago. I think
On 04/13/2015 11:17 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 01:07 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 04/13/2015 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2015 10:29 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
On 04/13/2015 11:42 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 18:25 -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
James Pearson wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 20:13, "Les Mikesell" wrote:
I see in CentOS 7 that /etc/localtime is a symlink (which seems
sensible...) but in earlier versions it is a copy of some file from
under /usr/share/zoneinfo.
rpm -q --scripts tzdata
does not show any postinstall script, so in
For those of you not currently on the centos-devel mailing list, we are
looking to test signed repomd.xml files (repomd.xml.asc) for CentOS-6
and CentOS-7. If you are interested in signed metadata repos, please
look at this post:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013210.ht
Morning, Johnny,
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> For those of you not currently on the centos-devel mailing list, we are
> looking to test signed repomd.xml files (repomd.xml.asc) for CentOS-6
> and CentOS-7. If you are interested in signed metadata repos, please
> look at this post:
>
> http://lists.cent
After much searching I found how to hide the panel.
dbus-send --print-reply --session --type=method_call --dest=org.gnome.Shell
/org/gnome/Shell org.gnome.Shell.Eval string:'Main.panel.actor.hide();'
Works great...
However - I also wish to hide the bottom panel or workspace.
Anyone know what th
Hi,
Today I migrated a server form C6 to C7. The machine is dedicated for a
couple of redis daemons. given the traffic etc, we see cpu0 being 100% in
use immediately. No problem, had the same thing on the C6 server.
So I pinned certain processes/irq's to other CPU's and made irqbalance was
monito
I should have mentioned that the bug I found was #0007177 in the centos bug
tracker
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there
are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps -
Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan
packages.
What is the current consensus w.r.t. building an IPSec VPN "server"
(concentrator
2015-04-14 21:07 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei :
> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there are
> no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - Openswan,
> strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages.
>
> What is the current consensus w.r
On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote:
I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there
are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps -
Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages.
libreswan replaced openswan, and is av
On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote:
I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there
are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps -
Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan
packa
2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei :
> On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote:
>>
>>> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there
>>> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps -
>>> Openswan
On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei :
http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406
If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load
balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan.
Well, both packages can do ipsec to
Does anyone have the magic incantation required to getting
*independent* multi-monitors going under CentOS 7? Ideally
under xfce or trinity, but I'm interested about GNOME/KDE
observations as well.
I'm trying to move my main workstation from CentOS5 to CentOS7
and while the spanned desktop work
2015-04-14 22:05 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei :
> On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> 2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei :
>>
>>>
>>> http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406
>>>
>>> If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load
>>> balancing might tilt the balance in
Hello ,
No I do not use bridging . It is a fresh install , with no alterations . I
only removed NetworkManager and manually configured the network script for
static IP . After " yum install fail2ban" (which brought ebtables with it)
and reboot , I cannot connect .
Kind regards.
2015-04-12 6:12 G
On 4/11/2015 2:00 AM, Mehmet Allar wrote:
After setup , I wanted go forward with IPtables instead of Firewalld , so
remove firewalld and install iptables. After configuration and tests , I
installed Fail2Ban ,(which brought ebtables with it ) and after reboot I
was not able to connect to the devi
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:08:56PM -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
> Does anyone have the magic incantation required to getting
> *independent* multi-monitors going under CentOS 7? Ideally
> under xfce or trinity, but I'm interested about GNOME/KDE
> observations as well.
>
> I'm trying to move my ma
> >
> > Thanks as always for what you and the rest of the CentOS team do, just
> > appreciation and admiration for all you guys (and gals?) do for the
> > community.
> > Rob
>
> To be perfectly honest, I am not thrilled with the movement either from
> the enterprise stability point of view .. BUT
Awhile back the mouse wheel stopped working when trying to switch workspaces in
the overview, sometime after the 7.1 udpate. Now it only works if the mouse is
over a thumbnail of an application and not when its on a blank workspace if
that makes any sense. I'm wondering if anyone else has seen
With GNOME3, the secondary monitors do not have workspaces. That is
useful for some workflows, but if you don't like it you can use
gnome-tweak-tool to give workspaces to all monitors. Hope this helps.
Kal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
23 matches
Mail list logo
