On 03/31/2015 08:23 AM, Dulmandakh wrote:
Hello,
I believe all 7 updates are on hold til 7.1 releases, 'any day now’.
We’re having a bit of mess in here :D
it may be in the CR repo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
Well, read article from: https://access.redhat.com/articles/1384453
Anyway, If You are really running centos 5.5 then you are missing more
important security patches and you should immediately update to latest
version 5.11
--
Eero
2015-03-31 9:57 GMT+03:00 Venkateswara Rao Dokku :
> just for m
Hi everyone,
I'm having some issue with a Qt application using D-Bus (Qt API) in a
threaded appllication on CentOS 6.
Searching for the cause has led me to the following issues in the dbus library:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1775
Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
--
Michel Donais
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 31.3.2015 14.43, donais wrote:
Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
See this. It depends on the operating system version and filesystem
(ext4, xfs etc.).
http://wiki.centos.org/A
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:42:05 -0400, Stephen wrote:
>
> 16G/swap 500MB/boot 80G/home 50G/root
>
> 800G/sdb
>
> will not install Grub bootloader Fatal error
Um, this is JBOD, and not RAID1.
Raid1 would be 2x drives (sda & sdb) appearing as one single drive to the
OS. Data is byte for byte mi
2015-03-31 15:07 GMT+03:00 Jussi Hirvi :
> On 31.3.2015 14.43, donais wrote:
>
>> Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
>> Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
>> Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
>>
>
> See this. It depends on the operating system version an
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:47:24PM -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> Forget I ever said I wanted to replace glibc. Assume it’s a different
> library or application.
Except libc is not just like any other library. Unless you're going
to recompile the software, the location of the ld loader is hard
After a long time I found the following solution:
I use the "traditional" way by exporting an environment variable http_proxy. After
editing yum.conf by adding a line "proxy=libproxy" everything works fine.
Regards
Tim
Am 16.01.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Tim:
I read sth. about cntlm, but it is no
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Dave Johansen
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ron E wrote:
>
>> Dear List,
>>
>> We have noticed a variety of reproducible conditions working with sparse
>> files on multiple servers under load with CentOS 6.4.
>>
>> The short story is that processes th
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
>
>> Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
>> not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
>> install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only reasonable
>> thing to
On 03/31/2015 11:12 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe
> wrote:
>>
>>> Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
>>> not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
>>> install of centos 7 and run it on
I'm moving some server configurations from Ubuntu Server 12.04 to CentOS
6.6. Now I'm working on `/etc/init` script that should be handled by
`upstart` at both OS as far as I know. The files on both server are the
same and I mean the same at content level and also at path level and
permissions leve
As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which derive
from RHEL 7.1?
or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
Thanks!
-Ryan
> On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:30 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> We would like to announ
On 03/31/2015 09:53 AM, Ryan Qian wrote:
As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which derive
from RHEL 7.1?
or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
Thanks!
-Ryan
That was going to be my question as well. According to
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ce
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
>
>
> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
Perhaps, but I’m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears that
Docker requires 64-bit. Oh w
I know this isn't CentOS-specific, but it is probably a common problem
- does anyone have a solution?
If you mail something that is plain text from linux a recipient using
outlook, it will remove line breaks more or less randomly. There is
a way to tell outook to put them back as you read each m
Outlook is the devil. It wants to get mail in html to make things look
right for everyone, since most people just leave the defaults on.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
> I know this isn't CentOS-specific, but it is probably a common problem
> - does anyone have a solution
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>>> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
>>
>>
>> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
>
> Perhaps, but I’m running CentOS 6.6 i68
On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> On 03/31/2015 09:53 AM, Ryan Qian wrote:
>> As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which
>> derive from RHEL 7.1?
>> or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Ryan
>
>
> That was going to be my quest
On 03/31/2015 01:28 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
>> On 03/31/2015 09:53 AM, Ryan Qian wrote:
>>> As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which
>>> derive from RHEL 7.1?
>>> or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
>>>
>>> T
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe
> wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin wrote:
>>
Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
>>>
>>> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the
>>> app.
>>
>> Perhaps
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:21 PM, wrote:
>>> Perhaps, but I’m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears
>>> that Docker requires 64-bit. Oh well, I was getting my hopes up for a
> while.
>
> I haven't really been following this thread closely, but would it be a
> dumb question
On 3/31/2015 4:43 AM, donais wrote:
Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
you sure of that model number? not finding that at lenovo to look up
the storage controller specs, I can find
There was an update to opendkim 2.10.1 which I applied and now I am
seeing this:
warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection
refused
I tried to yum history rollback to 2.9.1 but that package has
disappeared so I am evidently constrained to resolve this.
Does anyone have a
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting
> that message?
I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a "rpmsave" file
left after installing the update? If so, that's your old configuration
El 31/03/2015 a las 03:18 p.m., Frank Cox escribió:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400
James B. Byrne wrote:
Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting
that message?
I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a "rpmsave" file
left after installing
Am 31.03.2015 um 22:11 schrieb James B. Byrne:
There was an update to opendkim 2.10.1 which I applied and now I am
seeing this:
warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection
refused
[ ... ]
Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting
that messa
Le 31/03/2015 20:30, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
I would have assumed that this release would be "7.1.1503", and the URL
>>on at least one mirror has:
>>
>>http://mirror.fdcservers.net/centos/7.1.1503/
>>
>>Guess if that's the new convention, I'll need to keep my ISO files
>>sorted out somehow, as th
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:28 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> > CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso
> > CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso
> Please take a look at the "Archived Versions", and the Release Announcement:
>
> They both tell you that 7 (1503) is derived
Just updated to release 7 1503. CentOS team is awesome!
I thought I read sometime back that the release was going to
rebase to a newer gnome?
Did that not happen? Is there a way to get release 7 to a later gnome
version?
Thanks! Looking forward to playing.
Jerry
>From what I've read there will be a newer Gnome in 7.2.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Jerry Geis"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April, 2015 00:04:11
> Subject: [CentOS] Release 7 1503
> Jus
Just wanted to say "Thanks!" to the CentOS team for their efforts to put out a
7.1 release.
Upgraded several systems, so far smooth sailing. Good job!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
On 03/31/2015 04:24 PM, Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 31/03/2015 20:30, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>>> I would have assumed that this release would be "7.1.1503", and the URL
>>> >>on at least one mirror has:
>>> >>
>>> >>http://mirror.fdcservers.net/centos/7.1.1503/
>>> >>
>>> >>Guess if that's the new conv
On 03/31/2015 05:56 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:28 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
>>> CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso
>>> CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso
>
>> Please take a look at the "Archived Versions", and the Release Annou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2015 03:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> It is also my opinion that the name CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso
>> is rather confusing, it is not immediately evident that it is
>> release 7.1. I would have prefered the name
>> CentOS-7.1-1503-x86_64-D
On 03/30/2015 07:28 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
Can somebody tell me what this error means (server, domain etc.
changed to protect the innocent)?
ldapsearch -H ldap://ldapserv-1.example.com:389 -ZZ -W -D
cn=Boss,dc=example,dc=com -b dc=example,dc=com uid=testuser homeDirectory
ldap_start_tls: Co
+1 for that!
On 1 April 2015 at 02:25, Nux! wrote:
> Just wanted to say "Thanks!" to the CentOS team for their efforts to put
> out a 7.1 release.
>
> Upgraded several systems, so far smooth sailing. Good job!
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> _
On 3/31/2015 5:25 PM, Nux! wrote:
Just wanted to say "Thanks!" to the CentOS team for their efforts to put out a
7.1 release.
so I updated my c7 dev systems last night with CR... do I need to do
anything special to get it to clean update ? yum update isn't offering
me anything newer and
40 matches
Mail list logo
