Re: [CentOS] Fedora Mock

On 22 Mar 2015 23:51, "Always Learning" wrote: > > > On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 19:38 -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > On 03/22/15 16:22, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > > how do > > > I build in mock? > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock > > Noticing a minor error, a spelling mistake, on > http://

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

I find this very, very sad. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Always Learning" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Sunday, 22 March, 2015 18:19:19 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

[CentOS] Services supporting Kerberos and/or TLS client certificate authentication

Hello, We're starting to use FreeIPA in house (which is awesome btw) which means that Kerberos and TLS client certificate authentication is suddenly quite easy. Im looking for a list of common Linux services with data on how one can Authenticate/Authorise for these services. * httpd support TLS c

Re: [CentOS] CPOS-7-Installation-20141120-1 install problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/03/15 22:35, Sean.lim wrote: > Hi > > > > I install the CPOS-7-Installation-20141120-1.ISO on the AIX power > 720 > > (CentOS power PC version for the AIX power serices) > > Then I saw a message below > > > > Please wait, loading kernel.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

muiz wrote: Dear all, I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? [root@s1 abc]# getfacl /abc # file: abc # owner: root # group: root u

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

On Mon, March 23, 2015 05:24, Nux! wrote: > I find this very, very sad. > I find it unsavoury. We are recommending that acknowledged newbies subscribe to a service known for repeatedly and persistently violating its members' privacy? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***

Re: [CentOS] Services supporting Kerberos and/or TLS client certificate authentication

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Andrew Holway wrote: > > Hello, > > We're starting to use FreeIPA in house (which is awesome btw) which means > that Kerberos and TLS client certificate authentication is suddenly quite > easy. Im looking for a list of common Linux services with data on ho

Re: [CentOS] Services supporting Kerberos and/or TLS client certificate authentication

Hi Jonathan, http / rabbitmq just examples. I'm looking for a list. On 23 March 2015 at 15:17, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Andrew Holway wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > We're starting to use FreeIPA in house (which is awesome btw) which means > > that Ke

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:53 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, March 23, 2015 05:24, Nux! wrote: > > I find this very, very sad. > > I find it unsavoury. We are recommending that acknowledged newbies > subscribe to a service known for repeatedly and persistently violating > its members' priv

[CentOS] default password of centos 7 images inside http://cloud.centos.org/

Hi, I'm trying to to use the centos 7 images provided by http://cloud.centos.org/, this works fine when using centos user to ssh in with keys, but I'm trying to create a new image base on it, so does it have default password I can use to login to the console, before I can configure the network

Re: [CentOS] FYI: OpenSSL Patch to Plug Severe Security Holes

Is there any update yet on when these fixes might be available in CentOS? thanks, -Alan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, March 23, 2015 05:24, Nux! wrote: >> I find this very, very sad. >> > I find it unsavoury. We are recommending that acknowledged newbies > subscribe to a service known for repeatedly and persistently violating > its members' privacy? And as far as I'm concerned,

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:53 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, March 23, 2015 05:24, Nux! wrote: >> I find this very, very sad. >> > > I find it unsavoury. We are recommending that acknowledged newbies > subscribe to a service known for repeatedly and persistently violating > its members' pri

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

Le 23/03/2015 17:26, Les Mikesell a écrit : There is a real simple answer to privacy on facebook. Just don't post anything there that you would not want to be public. Just like this mail list. I recently joined that list and wanted to publish a simple link to my technical blog dedicated to Ce

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

For me the main problem is the fact it is not a public place which I should be able to read without a facebook login. What is this? State within a state, Internet within Internet? How bad would it be if the mailing lists of open source projects were not public? To what would the search engines

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

That's ridiculous. People promote their businesses. Celebrities have their pages. (Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for any spelling or grammatical errors.) > On Mar 23, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > Le 23/03/2015 17:26, Les Mikesell a écrit : >> Ther

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

On 3/23/2015 9:26 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: There is a real simple answer to privacy on facebook. Just don't post anything there that you would not want to be public. Just like this mail list. You don't have to post, fecebook also tracks what you read and uses that to build profiles of you whic

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:53 AM, James B. Byrne > wrote: >> >> On Mon, March 23, 2015 05:24, Nux! wrote: >>> I find this very, very sad. >> >> I find it unsavoury. We are recommending that acknowledged newbies >> subscribe to a service known for repeatedly and persistently v

Re: [CentOS] Facebook CentOS group close to 15.000 members!

Niki Kovacs wrote: > Le 23/03/2015 17:26, Les Mikesell a écrit : >> There is a real simple answer to privacy on facebook. Just don't post >> anything there that you would not want to be public. Just like this >> mail list. > > I recently joined that list and wanted to publish a simple link to my >

Re: [CentOS] FYI: OpenSSL Patch to Plug Severe Security Holes

On 03/23/2015 07:35 AM, Alan McKay wrote: Is there any update yet on when these fixes might be available in CentOS? As best I understand it, two of the three bugs don't affect the version of openssl currently distributed. The third bug only affects systems with a malformed EC private key, wh

Re: [CentOS] default password of centos 7 images inside http://cloud.centos.org/

Hello, I believe the root password is disabled (also SSH password logins). What you can do is boot in single user (init=/bin/sh) and unlock the password, set a custom password etc. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - >

[CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

Hi, Everytime I restart Centos 7 I receive a error saying… metadata is corrupt and then I need to go through the process of mount and unmount the disk uuid then run xfs_repair {some uuid} or xfs_repair -L {some uuid} which ultimately corrupts even more. I’m running on a RAID 1 two

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

On 3/23/2015 1:24 PM, Stephen Drotar wrote: Everytime I restart Centos 7 I receive a error saying… metadata is corrupt and then I need to go through the process of mount and unmount the disk uuid then run xfs_repair {some uuid} or xfs_repair -L {some uuid} which ultimately corrupts

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

Hi, Can CENTOS be used with ext3 or ext4 partitioning? Steve > On Mar 23, 2015, at 4:47 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 3/23/2015 1:24 PM, Stephen Drotar wrote: >> Everytime I restart Centos 7 I receive a error saying… >> >> metadata is corrupt >> >> and then I need to go through

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

On Mar 23, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Stephen Drotar wrote: > > Can CENTOS be used with ext3 or ext4 partitioning? Better to speak of ext3 and ext4 as filesystems, rather than partition types. The partition type is 83 in both cases, which doesn’t distinguish them. All current versions of CentOS suppor

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

On 3/23/2015 2:23 PM, Stephen Drotar wrote: Can CENTOS be used with ext3 or ext4 partitioning? versions up to and including 6 used ext by default. xfs is the default in centos 7, and has worked perfectly for me. -- john, recycling bits in santa cruz _

Re: [CentOS] default password of centos 7 images inside http://cloud.centos.org/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Will "$ sudo passwd" work? It does with some live CD distros. On 23/03/15 19:35, Nux! wrote: > Hello, > > I believe the root password is disabled (also SSH password > logins). What you can do is boot in single user (init=/bin/sh) and > unlock the pa

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

On 2015-03-23, Stephen Drotar wrote: > > Can CENTOS be used with ext3 or ext4 partitioning? Yes (as someone else said, they're filesystem types, not partition types), but if there is a hardware issue, as John noted, ext3 or ext4 won't solve the problem. xfs is usually fairly solid, so it is very

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Stephen Drotar wrote: > Hi, > > Everytime I restart Centos 7 I receive a error saying… > > metadata is corrupt > > and then I need to go through the process of mount and unmount the disk uuid > then run > > xfs_repair {some uuid} > or > xfs_repair -L {some

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

Hi, James, The file system is xfs (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs 1891292900 1556745108 334547792 83% /home) Thanks and best regards, Muiz At 2015-03-23 19:36:02, "James Pearson" wrote: >muiz wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> >> I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL contr

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

On 2015-03-23, Chris Murphy wrote: > > For future reference -L is a big hammer. If you use it without > explicitly attempting a read-write mount (which a read only mount at > boot time will not do because it's an ro mount by default) ...for the root filesystem, anyway. For nonroot filesystems it

Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-03-23, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> For future reference -L is a big hammer. If you use it without >> explicitly attempting a read-write mount (which a read only mount at >> boot time will not do because it's an ro mount by default) > >

[CentOS] error building php spec file

Hey all, I'm attempting to build a spec file of php 5.6.7 - the latest stable - into an rpm. And it's failing with this set of errors: Processing files: php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm error: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar -> /home/bluethun

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

Hi, How many user's you have assigned on that directory? --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, muiz wrote: > Hi, James, > The file system is xfs (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs 1891292900 > 1556745108 334547792 83% /home) > > > Thanks and best regards, > Mui

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

On 3/19/2015 6:14 PM, muiz wrote: I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? put all those users in a group, and delete all the user AC

Re: [CentOS] error building php spec file

Hi. Which CentOS version you using? If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS repo which has latest php packages. Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6. --Regards Ashish

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

Hi, On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:22 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/19/2015 6:14 PM, muiz wrote: > >> I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. >> There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new >> user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve th