Bonjour,
It seems that freeradius 3.0.1-6.el7 of centOS 7 don't work.
When doing very simple authentification (PAP control of ssh login on a
switch), I get a segmentation fault when the first accounting packet
arrives on the server.
Does anyone test succesfully this version of freeradius ?
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 09:26:59PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Fred Smith
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this:
> >
> > Generating grub configuration file ...
> > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
> > Found initrd image: /boot/
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 09:41:06PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this:
> > Generating grub configuration file ...
> > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
> > Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img
> > Found linux ima
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:24:47AM +, Richard wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> > Date: Sunday, March 01, 2015 21:50:34 -0500
> > From: Fred Smith
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual
> boot
> >
> > On Mon, Mar
I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and
also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace).
If you want "dodge" a fight with grub, you can install EasyBCD (to
windows OS) and handles multiple systems. (you can found a trial version):
http://neosmart.net/EasyBCD
On 03/02/2015 02:06 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and
> also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer
> had found the windows installation and it appeared in the grub menu,
> and was bootable and w
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Mário Barbosa wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 02:06 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and
> > also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer
> > had found the wind
> > I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
> > testing with
> > gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
> > latest exploit for
> > the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I want
> > to equip
> > geth
> On 28 February 2015 at 05:49, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
>
> > I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
> > testing with
> > gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
> > latest exploit for
> > the product we are shipping targeted for RHE
On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
>>> I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
>>> testing with
>>> gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
>>> latest exploit for
>>> the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and Cent
On 03/02/2015 11:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for
testing with
gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the
latest exploit for
th
Well, we got it working. However, the issue we're now worried about is
users creating files and subdirectories. Do we need to worry, and if so,
is there some way to reserve inodes < 32k table, other than creating tens
of thousands of dummy files now?
We don't want, a year or two down the road, for
On 3/2/2015 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, we got it working. However, the issue we're now worried about is
users creating files and subdirectories. Do we need to worry, and if so,
is there some way to reserve inodes < 32k table, other than creating tens
of thousands of dummy files now?
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/2/2015 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Well, we got it working. However, the issue we're now worried about is
>> users creating files and subdirectories. Do we need to worry, and if so,
>> is there some way to reserve inodes < 32k table, other than creating
>> tens
I'm having trouble figuring out which RPM would contain X11 fonts that
go by names containing:
"-courier-medium-r-*-18-"
"-courier-bold-r-*-18-"
"-courier-medium-o-*-18-"
in sizes 18 (shown), 14, and 12.
so far I can't figure it out.
I've looked at the contents of all the xorg-x11-fonts-* packa
Hey folks,
How would I allow a user to connect to an FTP server, upload and download
files and delete files as well, if that server is in enforcing mode for
SELinux?
I'm using proftpd 1.3.5 on CentOS 7.
Thank you!
Tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
_
On 3/2/2015 2:31 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
How would I allow a user to connect to an FTP server, upload and download
files and delete files as well, if that server is in enforcing mode for
SELinux?
step 1) delete FTPD, and use ssh/scp/rscp instead.
--
john r pierce
On 3/2/2015 2:34 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
step 1) delete FTPD, and use ssh/scp/rscp instead.
errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
___
CentOS mailin
>
> errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp
Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow
regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of
having a secure SELlinux server entirely?
Thanks
Tim
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:35 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3
>
> Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow
> regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of
> having a secure SELlinux server entirely?
>
Maybe use FTP in a jail? Or Linux containers?
___
CentO
2015-03-03 0:43 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy :
> >
> > errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp
>
>
> Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow
> regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of
> having a secure SELlinux server entirely?
>
FTP is not safe as
Also check this out: http://www.bitvise.com/ftp-bridge
--
Eero
2015-03-03 0:51 GMT+02:00 Eero Volotinen :
>
>
> 2015-03-03 0:43 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy :
>
>> >
>> > errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp
>>
>>
>> Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow
>> regular ol' FTP
Good advice guys. I'll check out vsftpd. Thanks!
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> Also check this out: http://www.bitvise.com/ftp-bridge
>
> --
> Eero
>
> 2015-03-03 0:51 GMT+02:00 Eero Volotinen :
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-03-03 0:43 GMT+02:00 Tim Dun
On 03/02/2015 11:55 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Also check this out: http://www.bitvise.com/ftp-bridge
you could also recommend filezilla to your clients, it's available for
mac, microsoft and linux and supports sftp.
But I know there are still use cases for ftp.
_
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Fred Smith
wrote:
>> Short solution:
>> Does /etc/default/grub contain 'GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER="true" ? If so,
>> comment that out and rerun the grub2-mkconfig command.
>
> No, it doesn't contain that line.
Weird. So that means os-prober isn't finding Windows. Wha
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> Ah, perhaps I didn't think to mention that I was installing Centos
> as a replacement for F19 (which is now EOL).
You did, I wasn't paying close enough attention. Sorry.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS m
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Mário Barbosa wrote:
>> 1) Install ntfs "support"
>> yum install -y epel-release
>> yum install -y ntfs-3g ntfsprogs
>>
>> 2) re-run the grub config gen script
>> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 06:05:37PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Fred Smith
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Mário Barbosa wrote:
>
> >> 1) Install ntfs "support"
> >> yum install -y epel-release
> >> yum install -y ntfs-3g ntfsprogs
> >>
> >>
28 matches
Mail list logo
