Re: [CentOS] C7, igb and DCB support for pause frame ?

Steven Tardy a écrit : DCB requires Priority Flow Control(PFC) aka 802.1Qbb. "Flow Control" is 802.3x. The two are often confused and not compatible. http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ethernet-controllers/ethernet-controller-i350-datasheet.html Mentions "flow control" several times, b

[CentOS] Package group "X Window System" has disappeared

Hi, Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the following approach: 1. Install minimal system. 2. yum groupinstall "X Window System" 3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts 4. Install applications as needed. This morning, the package

[CentOS] Cyrus 2.4 and Centos6

Hi Folks, I'd like to install cyrus-imapd 2.4 in CentOS6. Found rpm cyrus 2.4 for CentOS6 on rpmseek. cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-30.1.x86_64.rpm But there are conflicts with postfix 2.6.6. Can I ignore this conflicts or is there a suitable version of ppstfix available? Thx Timothy

Re: [CentOS] L2TP over IPSEC?

i know , i have configured On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38 PM, CS DBA wrote: > Hi All; > > anyone have any info on setting up a L2TP over IPSEC client vpn > connection? > > Thanks in advance > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://li

Re: [CentOS] Easy way to strip down CentOS?

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:36:58AM +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Le 26/02/2015 15:53, David Both a écrit : > >Ok, I understand, now. I just leave multiple desktops in place and > >switch between them as I want. But perhaps you have reasons to do it as > >you do. That is one thing I really appreciate

Re: [CentOS] Package group "X Window System" has disappeared

Try yum groupinstall Xfce or yum groupinstall "MATE Desktop" or yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop" or yum groupinstall "Server with GUI" suomi On 02/27/2015 10:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: Hi, Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the following approach: 1. Install

[CentOS] repositories

Hi all :-) This is my first post: I'm coming from debian/bsd world. A question about repositories: minimal installation (version 7) provides: CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-CR.repo CentOS-Debuginfo.repo CentOS-fasttrack.repo CentOS-Sources.repo CentOS-Vault.repo I known there are others repositories

Re: [CentOS] repositories

On 27/02/15 12:30, Pol Hallen wrote: > Hi all :-) > This is my first post: I'm coming from debian/bsd world. > > A question about repositories: > > minimal installation (version 7) provides: > > CentOS-Base.repo > CentOS-CR.repo > CentOS-Debuginfo.repo > CentOS-fasttrack.repo > CentOS-Sources.

Re: [CentOS] repositories

Hope that at least gets you started. Hi Ned, thanks for help :-) Pol ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Package group "X Window System" has disappeared

On 27/02/15 09:54, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the > following approach: > > 1. Install minimal system. > > 2. yum groupinstall "X Window System" > > 3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts > >

[CentOS] CentOS 7 hand-edit the network configuration files

Helo, on http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7 in 3. And what if I want the old naming back? is written: /etc/udev/rules.d/60-net.rules seems necessary to override /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-net.rules According to my experience, the text should be changed to: /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.ru

Re: [CentOS] Package group "X Window System" has disappeared

On 02/27/2015 02:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: Hi, Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the following approach: 1. Install minimal system. 2. yum groupinstall "X Window System" 3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts 4. Install applic

Re: [CentOS] Package group "X Window System" has disappeared

On 27/02/15 13:27, Greg Bailey wrote: > On 02/27/2015 02:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the >> following approach: >> >> 1. Install minimal system. >> >> 2. yum groupinstall "X Window System" >> >> 3. yum install gdm gnome-cl

Re: [CentOS] Cyrus 2.4 and Centos6

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:19:55AM +0100, Timothy Kesten wrote: > I'd like to install cyrus-imapd 2.4 in CentOS6. > Found rpm cyrus 2.4 for CentOS6 on rpmseek. > cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-30.1.x86_64.rpm > > But there are conflicts with postfix 2.6.6. > > Can I ignore this conflicts or is there a suitab

Re: [CentOS] Package group "X Window System" has disappeared

Greg Bailey wrote: > On 02/27/2015 02:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: >> Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the >> following approach: >> >> 1. Install minimal system. >> 2. yum groupinstall "X Window System" >> 3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberat

Re: [CentOS] Package group "X Window System" has disappeared

Le 27/02/2015 16:01, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit : That's*weird* . Why would you even want "hidden" groups? Weird and... not very intelligent. To say it politely. :o) -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://ww

Re: [CentOS] Cyrus 2.4 and Centos6

Is there a reason why you need 2.4 vs. the 2.3 package from the CentOS6 repos? Mike On 02/27/2015 05:19 AM, Timothy Kesten wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'd like to install cyrus-imapd 2.4 in CentOS6. > Found rpm cyrus 2.4 for CentOS6 on rpmseek. > cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-30.1.x86_64.rpm > > But there are co

[CentOS] Glibc sources?

All, Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora user and may blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request. I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are

Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:49:23PM +, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > But, when looking through the source code for this version on the CentOS > servers I only see: > > [ ] glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.src.rpm27-Jan-2015 23:13 15M

Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?

On 27 February 2015 at 13:49, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > All, > > Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora > user and may > blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request. > > I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for > t

Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?

On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:49:23 + ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > Compiled on a Linux 2.6.32 system on 2015-01-27. >glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.src.rpm 27-Jan-2015 23:13 15M The date on that rpm matches the compiled on date that you posted. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www

[CentOS] Odd nfs mount problem

I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS 6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but the other server, not so much. ls /mountpoint/directory eventually times out (directory being the NFS mount). mount -t nfs server:/location/being/exported /

Re: [CentOS] Odd nfs mount problem

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS > 6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but the > other server, not so much. > > ls /mountpoint/directory eventually times out (directory being the NFS > mount). mount -t nf

[CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 bytes/sector drives any more. Some have better 512e emulation than others. Looking for some advice on which to avoid and which are recommended. Thanks.

Re: [CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

On 2/27/2015 12:53 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 bytes/sector drives any more. Some have better 512e emulation than others. Looking for some advice on

[CentOS] yum causing RPC timed out?

I just installed centos 7, yum is acting strange, experiencing RPC time-outs. Sometimes when I disable the additional repos (epel and rpmforge) it seems to make things act normal. But not this time (see below). Could I have some misconfiguration? Network glitch? What hypotheses should I be conside

Re: [CentOS] yum causing RPC timed out?

Apparently CentOS-7 - Base is failing, what does that mean? How do I contact the upstream for the repo? How do I find a working upstream? More info from command execution: do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out http://mirror.supremebytes.com/centos/7.0.1406/os/x8

Re: [CentOS] Odd nfs mount problem [SOLVED]

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS >> 6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but >> the >> other server, not so much. >> >> ls /mountpoint/directory eventually times out (directory b

Re: [CentOS] yum causing RPC timed out?

On 02/27/2015 01:11 PM, Dave Burns wrote: > Apparently CentOS-7 - Base is failing, what does that mean? How do I > contact the upstream for the repo? How do I find a working upstream? > > More info from command execution: > do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out > do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Timed ou

Re: [CentOS] yum causing RPC timed out?

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Eriksson < thomas.eriks...@slac.stanford.edu> wrote: > > This has nothing to do with yum. > > You are using NIS for name lookup and your NIS server is not responding. NIS is working fine, at least, for what I expect it to do. What makes you think NIS is

Re: [CentOS] yum causing RPC timed out?

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:38:06PM -1000, Dave Burns wrote: > What makes you think NIS is involved? > Is Errno 12 a clue? I tried searching for (do_ypcall: clnt_call: rpc: timed "do_ypcall" is a NIS error message. (Previous NIS was called "yellow pages"; the "yp" in do_ypcall is a reference to t

Re: [CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 > bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 > bytes/sector drives any more. 512n drives still exist, although they tend to be a bit s

Re: [CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

Chris Murphy wrote: > The emulation implementations don't come into play if the alignment is > correct from the start. The better implementations have significantly > less pathological behavior if alignment is wrong, but that's > anecdotal, I don't have any empirical data available. But I'd say in

Re: [CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

On 2/27/2015 3:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alignment's easy: using parted (the user-hostile program), if you do go in with parted -a optimal /dev/drive, and do mkpart pri ext4 0.0GB 100% (for non-root drives, for example), it's aligned correctly. i found -a optimal to do weird things, and al

Re: [CentOS] yum causing RPC timed out?

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > "do_ypcall" is a NIS error message. (Previous NIS was called "yellow > pages"; the "yp" in do_ypcall is a reference to that). > > Maybe you have "hosts: files nis" in /etc/nsswitch.conf or something > else that's causing the OS to want t

[CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

Dear All, I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server. I have an VG call vg_hosting consisting of 4 PVs each contained in a separate hard drive (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1, and /dev/sdd1). And this LV: lv_home was created to use all the space of the 4 PVs. Right now, the third h

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On 2/27/2015 4:25 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: Right now, the third hard drive is damaged; and therefore the third PV (/dev/sdc1) cannot be accessed anymore. I would like to recover whatever left in the other 3 PVs (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, and /dev/sdd1). your data is spread across all 4 drives, and yo

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

- Original Message - | Dear All, | | I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server. | I have an VG call vg_hosting consisting of 4 PVs each contained in a | separate hard drive (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1, and /dev/sdd1). | And this LV: lv_home was created to use all the

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

Thank you, John for your quick reply. That is what I hope. But how to do it? I cannot even activate the LV with the remaining PVs. Thanks, Khem On Sat, February 28, 2015 7:34 am, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/27/2015 4:25 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: > >> Right now, the third hard drive is damaged; and t

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

Dear James, Thank you for being quick to help. Yes, I could see all of them: # vgs # lvs # pvs Regards, Khem On Sat, February 28, 2015 7:37 am, James A. Peltier wrote: > > > - Original Message - > | Dear All, > | > | I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server. > | I have

Re: [CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

The default for fdisk, parted, and gdisk is starting the first partition on LBA 2048, which is 8 sector aligned. You don't need any options. The alternative is to simply not partition the drives or the resulting RAID and just format it. Chris Murphy ___

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On 2/27/2015 4:37 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: | I was able to create a new PV and restore the VG Config/meta data: | | # pvcreate --restorefile ... --uuid ... /dev/sdc1 | oh, that step means you won't be able to recover ANY of the data that was formerly on that PV. -- john r pierce

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

Dear John, I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate it. What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left? Regards, Khem On Sat, February 28, 2015 7:42 am, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/2

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

Hello James and All, For your information, here's the listing looks like: [root@localhost ~]# pvs PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/sda1 vg_hosting lvm2 a-- 1.82t0 /dev/sdb2 vg_hosting lvm2 a-- 1.82t0 /dev/sdc1 vg_hosting lvm2 a-- 1.82t0 /dev/sdd1 vg_ho

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 07:25 +0700, Khemara Lyn wrote: > I have tried with the following: > > 1. Removing the broken PV: > > # vgreduce --force vg_hosting /dev/sdc1 > Physical volume "/dev/sdc1" still in use Next time, try "vgreduce --removemissing " first. In my experience, any lvm command u

Re: [CentOS] yum causing RPC timed out?

On 02/27/2015 04:16 PM, Dave Burns wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: >> >> "do_ypcall" is a NIS error message. (Previous NIS was called "yellow >> pages"; the "yp" in do_ypcall is a reference to that). >> >> Maybe you have "hosts: files nis" in /etc/nsswitch.conf or

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

OK It's extremely rude to cross post the same question across multiple lists like this at exactly the same time, and without at least showing the cross posting. I just replied to the one on Fedora users before I saw this post. This sort of thing wastes people's time. Pick one list based on the best

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

Ok, sorry about that. On Sat, February 28, 2015 9:13 am, Chris Murphy wrote: > OK It's extremely rude to cross post the same question across multiple > lists like this at exactly the same time, and without at least showing the > cross posting. I just replied to the one on Fedora users before I saw

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-February/458923.html I don't see how the VG metadata is restored with any of the commands suggested thus far. I think that's vgcfgrestore. Otherwise I'd think that LVM has no idea how to do the LE to PE mapping. In any case, this sounds like a

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate it. What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left? take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 100

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:24:57 -0800 John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: > > > > What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left? > > take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 1000s of files of 100s of > pages each, with the index cards interleaved in the fi

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:24 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: >> >> I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again >> with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate >> it. >> >> What is the right way to recover t

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

OK so ext4 this time, with new disk images. I notice at mkfs.ext4 that each virtual disk goes from 2MB to 130MB-150MB each. That's a lot of fs metadata, and it's fairly evenly distributed across each drive. Copied 3.5GB to the volume. Unmount. Poweroff. Killed 3rd of 4. Boot. Mounts fine. No error

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On 2/27/2015 8:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: And this is why I don't like LVM to begin with. If one of the drives dies, you're screwed not only for the data on that drive, but even for data on remaining healthy drives. with classic LVM, you were supposed to use raid for your PV's. The new LV

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/27/2015 8:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> >> And this is why I don't like LVM to begin with. If one of the drives >> dies, you're screwed not only for the data on that drive, but even for >> data on remaining healthy drives. > > > with

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

And then Btrfs (no LVM). mkfs.btrfs -d single /dev/sd[bcde] mount /dev/sdb /mnt/bigbtr cp -a /usr /mnt/bigbtr Unmount. Poweroff. Kill 3rd of 4 drives. Poweron. mount -o degraded,ro /dev/sdb /mnt/bigbtr ## degraded,ro is required or mount fails cp -a /mnt/bigbtr/usr/ /mnt/btrfs## copy to a d

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > And this is why I don't like LVM to begin with. If one of the drives > dies, you're screwed not only for the data on that drive, but even for > data on remaining healthy drives. It has its uses, just like RAID0 has uses. But yes, as the nu

[CentOS] disk space trouble on ec2 instance

Hey all, Ok, so I've been having some trouble for a while with an EC2 instance running CentOS 5.11 with a disk volume reporting 100% usage. Root is on an EBS volume. So I've tried the whole 'du -sk | sort -nr | head -10' routine all around this volume getting rid of files. At first I was gett

Re: [CentOS] disk space trouble on ec2 instance

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 01:46:15 -0500 Tim Dunphy wrote: > /dev/sda1 9.9G 9.3G 49M 100% / 49mb out of 9.9gb is less than one-half of one percent, so the df command is probably rounding that up to 100% instead of showing you 99.51%. Whatever is checking for free disk space is likely

Re: [CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Robert Arkiletian > wrote: > > Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 > > bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 > > bytes/sector drives any

Re: [CentOS] disk space trouble on ec2 instance

On 2/27/2015 10:46 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: I'm at a loss to explain how I can delete 190MB worth of data, reboot the instance and still be at 100% usage. 190MB is less than one percent of 9.9GB aka 9900MB BTW, for cases like this, I'd suggest using df -k or -m rather than -h to get more precise