[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 5

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update

On Jan 14 10:37pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) I was surprised to find

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update

On 01/15/2015 07:15 AM, centoslistm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Jan 14 10:37pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 >> >> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html >> >> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently >>

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update

On Jan 15 8:27am, Johnny Hughes wrote: I had to resign the first ones and release them. The only differences between the two package sets, if you were to compare them would be the signing data/time. Thank you for the explanation. It eases my mind considerably. :) ___

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update

On 01/15/2015 08:27 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: There was what we thought was a huge problem with the packages, that ended up being this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182337 http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-January/020880.html The reason they are differen

[CentOS] leap second and Centos

Hi. We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? -G ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz wrote: > > Hi. > > We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap > seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? Apparently Red Hat is well aware of the upcoming leap second: https://access.redhat.

Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

> -Original Message- > From: Akemi Yagi > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:05 > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with > Centos and leap > > seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved?

Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > 6 different ways of saying "Will my system work?" . > [...lots of stuff...] > [*:side bar: see http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1199.html for the > patch or do something like "date $(date +someformatthatworks)"] > Can you consolida

Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

> -Original Message- > From: Les Mikesell > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:36 > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jason Pyeron > wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Akemi Yagi > > > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:05 > > > > > > Apparently Red Hat is well

Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz wrote: >> We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap >> seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? > > Apparently Red Hat is well aware of

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid LSI Megaraid not working since Centos 6.6

On 01/14/2015 08:00 AM, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: > Le 14/01/2015 14:43, Nux! a écrit : >> You should open perhaps a bugzilla issue with redhat about this. > > Is it possible to post in Redhat bugzilla without a Redhat support > contract ? Even when using Centos ? Yes, anyone can file a

[CentOS] Socket behavior change from 6.5 to 6.6

I will try to explain this as best I can. I have two computers; one a Supermicro X10SAE running CentOS 6, the other a very old DOS box.[*] The DOS box runs a CCD camera, sending images via Ethernet to the X10SAE. Thus, the X10SAE runs a Python server on port 5700 (a socket which binds to 5700 and

[CentOS] What happened to the default iptables rules on the minimal install of CentOS6 x86_64

Sometime ago the minimal install stopped putting a default /etc/sysconfig/iptables file which allowed only ssh, why the change? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron

Re: [CentOS] Socket behavior change from 6.5 to 6.6

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:40:08PM -0300, Glenn Eychaner wrote: > My only theory is that this has something to do with non-ephemeral ports and > socket reuse, but I'm not sure what. If you want a quick detection that the link is dead, have the server occasionally send bytes to the dos box. You wi

Re: [CentOS] Socket behavior change from 6.5 to 6.6

Since you always use the same local port - maybe you need to set SO_REUSEADDR option. Greetings from Germany Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] restart after yum update (6.6)?

Hi, according to this : http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/28144/after-yum-update-is-it-a-good-idea-to-restart-the-server i should reboot my server after updating packages i.e: kernel, glibc, libc. Maybe it's a silly question, but Is it necessary if I don't use graphical environment ? (and

Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

On 01/16/2015 07:05 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz wrote: We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? A

Re: [CentOS] restart after yum update (6.6)?

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:36, Mateusz Guz wrote: > according to this : > > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/28144/after-yum-update-is-it-a-good-idea-to-restart-the-server > > i should reboot my server after updating packages i.e: kernel, glibc, libc. > Maybe it's a silly question, but I

Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: > > Fascinating - describes what's happening but no mention of how we can rest > assured that all will be well > As I ponder it, I recognise that most of our systems are constantly > calculating date/time values based upon the epoch - the numb

Re: [CentOS] DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue

Thanks for getting back with the "solution". You might want to give that bugzilla entry a jolt, it's been stagnating since last year. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Boris Epstein" > To: "CentOS mailing li

Re: [CentOS] DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue

We did - we got in touch with the owner of the package and are trying to get him to work on it. Cheers, Boris. On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Nux! wrote: > Thanks for getting back with the "solution". > You might want to give that bugzilla entry a jolt, it's been stagnating > since last year

[CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

Hey All, I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash screen was displayed. Out of curiosity I clicked on the [Documentation] tab at the top of the screen and got this: http://www.centos.org/docs/ Does an

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

On 15/01/15 07:05 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: Hey All, I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash screen was displayed. Out of curiosity I clicked on the [Documentation] tab at the top of the screen and go

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

On 16 January 2015 @00:05 zulu, Mark LaPierre wrote: Does anyone else see a problem here? Try https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/ then choose the version on the left. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org ht

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

On 15/01/15 07:27 PM, Darr247 wrote: On 16 January 2015 @00:05 zulu, Mark LaPierre wrote: Does anyone else see a problem here? Try https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/ then choose the version on the left. While useful, I don't imagine that was Mark's point

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 19:05 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Hey All, > > I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to > production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash > screen was displayed. Out of curiosity I clicked on the [Documentation] > tab at the

[CentOS] favorite cheap VPS services

Hey all, I'm trying to learn how to use some of the big data stores. Specifically I want to learn how to use CassandraDB and Hadoop. Originally I'd had the idea of trying to setup a cassandra ring on the Amazon AWS free tier. However it seems that neither will run on a t2.micro instance. So I wa

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

On Thu, January 15, 2015 6:50 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 19:05 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to >> production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash >> screen was displayed.

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote: So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be updated. Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs page, I'll continue perusing and referring t

[CentOS] shutdown -h doesn't

I've got a fresh CentOS 7 test machine, fully patched. The command: shutdown -h now surprisingly does not halt the machine. Instead it reboots it. WTF? I found the following Debian discussion which seems to be the same issue: Ho

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

On 15/01/15 10:55 PM, Darr247 wrote: On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote: So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be updated. Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs page, I'l

Re: [CentOS] shutdown -h doesn't

On 1/15/2015 8:05 PM, Devin Reade wrote: I've got a fresh CentOS 7 test machine, fully patched. The command: shutdown -h now I've seen systems with broken ACPI BIOS support auto-restart on a shutdown. sometimes the behavior can be modified with a BIOS option. -- john r pierce

Re: [CentOS] favorite cheap VPS services

On 01/15/2015 06:24 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm trying to learn how to use some of the big data stores. Specifically I > want to learn how to use CassandraDB and Hadoop. Originally I'd had the > idea of trying to setup a cassandra ring on the Amazon AWS free tier. > However it seems t