On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 13:03 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
> > We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
> > all IPv6s available for usage.
>
> Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats
> 1,208,925,819
On 01/11/2015 01:16 AM, Jason S. Evans wrote:
On 2015-01-10 23:31, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 01/10/2015 07:39 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than installing
Thunderbird
On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than
installing Thunderb
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Are you referring to this thread by any chance?
>>
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-December/148445.html
>>
>> The upstream bugzilla referenced in there is now private but I
>> pr
On 01/11/2015 10:08 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Are you referring to this thread by any chance?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-December/148445.html
The upstream bugzilla referenced in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.01.2015 03:42, James B. Byrne wrote:
> What does systemd buy the enterprise that sysinit did not provide?
>
Well (re)starting services in a reliable way?
Ensuring that services are up and running?
About which sysinit are you talking btw?
The in
On Sun, January 11, 2015 11:22 am, Sven Kieske wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11.01.2015 03:42, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> What does systemd buy the enterprise that sysinit did not provide?
>>
> Well (re)starting services in a reliable way?
> Ensuring that services a
On Sun, January 11, 2015 10:08 am, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols
> wrote:
>> On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>>> Are you referring to this thread by any chance?
>>>
>>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-December/148445.html
>>>
>>> The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.01.2015 19:05, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> That sounds like you have collected and counted "votes" pro and
> against systemd.
How could it sound like I collected "votes"? I don't care about votes
when it comes to technical superiority.
> As far as "
The normal usage for a /48 block is to divide it into /64 sub-networks
and use DHCP to issue addresses to each subnet from the corresponding
/64 segment.
I would recommend taking the IPv6 certification course from Hurricane
Electric at https://ipv6.he.net/certification/ as a start.
Mike
On 01/11/2015 01:04 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> On 11.01.2015 19:05, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> That sounds like you have collected and counted "votes" pro and
>> against systemd.
> How could it sound like I collected "votes"? I don't care about votes
> when it comes to technical superiority.
>
>> As f
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
> I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the
> design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems.
Design goals ? Compatibility with and/or minimum disruption to existing
s
On 01/11/2015 03:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the
design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems.
Design goals ? Compatibility
On Sun, January 11, 2015 2:05 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 03:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
>>
>>
>>> I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the
>>> design goals of systemd
On 01/11/2015 03:09 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 2:05 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 03:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> You guys can't just ignore the advantages of systemd and even ignore the
> points like they don't exist.
Anyone who already has 'enterprise' software already running on a
distribution without systemd (e.g. any earlier RHEL/CentOS) clearly
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Got a quick question and I hope this is an easy one!
>
> In my /etc/logrotate.conf file I have the following entry:
>
> # rotate all of the apache logs -- we'll rotate them here
> /var/log/mysqld.log {
> weekly
> size
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:02:26PM +, Always Learning wrote:
> Design goals ? Compatibility with and/or minimum disruption to existing
> systems ?
>
> It was arrogant change with absolutely no regard for the existing
> Centos/RHEL users. That *is* a strange "design goal" (or 'objective' in
>
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:42 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
>
>
> > Well, that's the limit of my offerings. I'm still trying to find the
> > thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered
> > over it for X s
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 21:02 -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 06:07 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> > I'm still trying to find the
> > thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered
> > over it for X seconds. With C6 I can't find it anymore and it switches
> > w
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:12:48PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:42 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > > Well, that's the limit of my offerings. I'm still trying to find the
> > > thing I use
On 2015-01-11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Indeed. Or another system altogether (sihg). I'm just extending your
> thought half a step farther ;-)
Or going even farther, if you like CentOS but not systemd, do the work
to get CentOS working without it. Unhappy Debian users are trying to do
this with
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 17:00 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> I know conspiracy theories are fun but your argument is simply
> absurd and insulting. At least try to assemble a convincing argument
> other than ad hominem and "change = bad".
Disruption = BAD
Gentle change / gradual change = GOOD
On Sun, January 11, 2015 5:16 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2015-01-11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> Indeed. Or another system altogether (sihg). I'm just extending your
>> thought half a step farther ;-)
>
> Or going even farther, if you like CentOS but not systemd, do the work
> to get CentOS wor
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if I
> look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I chose RedHat way
> back, - that was when all Debian (and its clones like Ubuntu,...) admins
> were fighting with the consequenc
On 01/11/2015 12:13 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Oh, boy. We do seem to have to treat Linux like Windows these days and
_reboot_ after any update, not only kernel or glibc update. So much for
"Unix-like", sigh ;-(
When you are trying to track down unexplained and only semi-repeatable
behavior, yo
On 01/11/2015 04:19 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 21:02 -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
I presume you're talking about panels with "Autohide" set. If you have
the GUI gconf-editor installed, it's under apps/panel/global/panel_show_delay.
You can also set it from the command lin
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 07:49:02PM -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 04:19 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> >On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 21:02 -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
> >>I presume you're talking about panels with "Autohide" set. If you have
> >>the GUI gconf-editor installed, it's under
>
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if
>> I
>> look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I chose RedHat way
>> back, - that was when all Debian (and its cl
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if
I
look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I chose RedHat way
back, - that
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
>>> On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat
if
On 01/11/2015 09:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy
On 01/11/2015 08:50 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 09:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
>>> On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2015-01-12, Va
On 01/11/2015 10:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2015 08:50 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith
I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational.
Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the
master server when the notify and transfer process happens.
The slave DNS server gets the changes to the modified zone, but the slave zone
fil
On 1/11/2015 9:28 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational.
Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the
master server when the notify and transfer process happens.
The slave DNS server gets the changes
36 matches
Mail list logo
