Hello Kahlil,
Tuesday, December 16, 2014, 11:19:11 PM, you wrote:
KH> Indeed: the sequence of dots and letters before the name indicates why
KH> rsync wants to update a file.
Ah, not time but owner and group are different, and not being changed on
the NAS.
Is this a CIFS "thing"?
--
Best reg
Hello Stuart,
Tuesday, December 16, 2014, 9:33:29 PM, you wrote:
SB> If this is a CIFS or other DOSish filesystem you may also need --no-o
SB> --no-p and/or --no-g to ignore other file attributes.
Looks like this may be the case to solve that problem.
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hi,
On an internal webserver (latest C6) I want smb-access to /var/www/html/
In april I did
chcon -R -t public_content_rw_t /var/www/html/
setsebool -P allow_smbd_anon_write 1
setsebool -P allow_httpd_anon_write 1
echo "/var/www/html/ -- unconfined_u:object_r:public_content_rw_t:
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi all,
I just wanted to give a heads up to any NVIDIA users that NVIDIA are
dropping support for older hardware based on G8xxx, G9xxx and GT2xx
chipsets in their latest display drivers. The last version to support
these older chipsets will be the current Long Lived 340.xx branch.
If anyone is us
On Wed, December 17, 2014 05:07, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On an internal webserver (latest C6) I want smb-access to /var/www/html/
> In april I did
> chcon -R -t public_content_rw_t /var/www/html/
> setsebool -P allow_smbd_anon_write 1
> setsebool -P allow_httpd_anon_write
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> echo "/var/www/html/ -- unconfined_u:object_r:public_content_rw_t:s0" >>
> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts
Next time try putting the local policy into:
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.lo
On 15/12/14 02:29, Clayton Kirkwood wrote:
> Redhat in centos? I type help and the first line says redhat. Are we
> paranoid about red..t?
Typically the way to look at it is :
- does that string imply that you are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- does that string imply this is code curated by Re
On 12/17/2014 05:07 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On an internal webserver (latest C6) I want smb-access to /var/www/html/
> In april I did
> chcon -R -t public_content_rw_t /var/www/html/
> setsebool -P allow_smbd_anon_write 1
> setsebool -P allow_httpd_anon_write 1
> echo
Op 17-12-14 om 14:56 schreef Jonathan Billings:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
echo "/var/www/html/ -- unconfined_u:object_r:public_content_rw_t:s0" >>
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts
Next time try putting the local policy into:
/etc
Op 17-12-14 om 15:12 schreef Daniel J Walsh:
On 12/17/2014 05:07 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
Hi,
On an internal webserver (latest C6) I want smb-access to /var/www/html/
In april I did
chcon -R -t public_content_rw_t /var/www/html/
setsebool -P allow_smbd_anon_write 1
setsebool
Hello,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:52:12 + Sorin Srbu wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
> > Sent: den 15 december 2014 11:12
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on Cen
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> KH> Indeed: the sequence of dots and letters before the name indicates why
> KH> rsync wants to update a file.
>
> Ah, not time but owner and group are different, and not being changed on
> the NAS.
>
> Is this a CIFS "thing"?
CIFS mounts
Hello CentOS list,
I have a requirement that I need to use encryption technology to encrypt
very large tar file on a daily basis. The tar file is over 250G size and
those are data backup. Every night the server generated a 250G data backup
and it¹s tar¹ed into one tarball file. I want to encrypt th
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:14:21PM +, Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
> used is "openssl smime -encrypt -aes256 -in backup.tar -binary -outform
> DEM -out backup.tar.ssl public.pem². The resulting backup.tar.ssl file is
> only 2G then encryption process stops there and refuse to do more. Cannot
> get ar
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Xinhuan Zheng
wrote:
> I have a requirement that I need to use encryption technology to encrypt
> very large tar file on a daily basis. The tar file is over 250G size and
> those are data backup. Every night the server generated a 250G data backup
> and it¹s tar¹e
Am 17.12.2014 um 18:42 schrieb Les Mikesell :
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Xinhuan Zheng
> wrote:
>> I have a requirement that I need to use encryption technology to encrypt
>> very large tar file on a daily basis. The tar file is over 250G size and
>> those are data backup. Every night the
On 17/12/14 18:54, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 17.12.2014 um 18:42 schrieb Les Mikesell :
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Xinhuan Zheng
>> wrote:
>>> I have a requirement that I need to use encryption technology to encrypt
>>> very large tar file on a daily basis. The tar file is over 250G size
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Markus wrote:
> On 17/12/14 18:54, Leon Fauster wrote:
> > Am 17.12.2014 um 18:42 schrieb Les Mikesell :
> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Xinhuan Zheng
> >> wrote:
> >>> I have a requirement that I need to use encryption technology to encrypt
> >>> v
hi all
sorry my poor english..
but you need encrypt that large file in symetric way. use the asymetric way
( public/private key par) to encrypt the symetric key.
Em 17/12/2014 15:58, "Markus" escreveu:
> On 17/12/14 18:54, Leon Fauster wrote:
> > Am 17.12.2014 um 18:42 schrieb Les Mikesell :
>
I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
that before I reported the bug. That one appeared in gmane, but
Evolution never picked it up.
And today I've not seen either of my posts but I know it got
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
wrote:
> I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
> reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
> that before I reported the bug. That one appeared in gmane, but
> Evolution never picked it
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Jia He wrote:
>
> Hi, I happened to meet with a similar issue like
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7051
>
> I found the root cause might be fixed by commit
> f13d4f979c518119bba5439dd2364d76d31dcd3f.
> The commit in branch linux-2.6.32-y is
> 0bd9ac380a44611
On 2014-12-17, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
> reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
> that before I reported the bug.
[snip]
> I use gmail and ISTR a discussion recently about some issues with
On 12/12/14 21:28, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 12/12/14 04:08, Ron Yorston wrote:
>> Last month we discussed the problems with webcams in CentOS 6 and I
>> raised Bugzilla #1158988 with Red Hat. This bug has now been declared
>> a duplicate of 1145805. Unfortunately I'm unable to access that report
On 12/17/14 19:31, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-12-17, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
>> I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
>> reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
>> that before I reported the bug.
>
> [snip]
>
>> I use gmail and
On 2014-12-18, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
> You could also address the email to yourself on a different mail server
> than the one your sending it from. I send to the list on gmail and
> address a copy to myself on AOL.
That won't help indicate whether your post made it to the list or not.
You'd need
On 16/12/14 18:15, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 16.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb For@ll:
>> On 15.12.2014 12:50, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2014 05:51 AM, For@ll wrote:
Hi
I had a two repo for cento6 where I can download httpd 2.2.29,
(baseurl=http://centos.alt.ru/repository/cen
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Keith Keller
wrote:
> On 2014-12-18, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>
>> You could also address the email to yourself on a different mail server
>> than the one your sending it from. I send to the list on gmail and
>> address a copy to myself on AOL.
>
> That won't help i
The version provided by CentOS does not support Forward Secrecy for SSL
or TLS 1.2.
Version 2.2.24+ of upstream Apache includes patches which enable both
Forward Secrecy and TLS 1.2.
Now that C6's OpenSSL can also support both TLS 1.2, and Forward
Secrecy, upgrading Apache slightly to be able
Am 18.12.2014 um 06:31 schrieb Jake Shipton :
> On 16/12/14 18:15, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Am 16.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb For@ll:
>>> On 15.12.2014 12:50, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Stephen I add this repo but I can't find them httpd 2.2.29 only in
>>> 2.2.15 version...
>>
>> What do you expect fro
31 matches
Mail list logo
