On 25/11/2014, isdtor wrote:
> We recently started upgrading users' workstations to CentOS6. Now
> we've come across an interesting issue:
> ~user/.local/share/gvfs-metadata is filling up with tons of files.
> Once there are around 69270 of them, no more are being created, and
> the NetApp filer t
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I just assembled a new machine.
>
> Mother Board: Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3
> Processor: AMD FX8350
> Memory: Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 2x8 GB
> Video: BFG Tech Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
>
> I tried the 6.6 x
I believe I have found the problem. CentOS version in use here is 6.4,
and it seems 6.6 has the updated packages.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561904
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1499.html
I have no access to BZ#902448, b
This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml.
On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote:
> When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux
> 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64
> x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enable
Thanks
Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a
newer version released that will fix it.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel J Walsh
Sent: 01 December 2014 14:58
To: CentOS mailing
I am not sure. I was just seeing email on this today. Could you try to
downgrade the latest version of libxml to see if the
problem goes away.
On 12/01/2014 10:01 AM, Gary Smithson wrote:
> Thanks
>
> Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a
> newer version
I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years,
but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups
I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear.
I was able to post to gmane.test, and could read these posts.
So I assume there is no problem with
Our firm is constrained by the requirements of an upstream VAN to use a
software package called SNetTerm; an MS-Windows based enhanced SSH
communications program. SNetTerm is from a corporation called InterSoft
International, Inc. This firm's web site was last accessible in June 2014 and
is now '
We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64
How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 be
sufficient
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel J Walsh
Sent: 01 December 2014 15:
On 12/01/2014 10:39 AM, Gary Smithson wrote:
> We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64
>
> How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64
> be sufficient
Ok might not be related. One other suggestion would be to clear the
database out. And see if th
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Arun Gupta wrote:
> Do you know the timelines by which it will be included in CentOS 7.0 ?
>
> Any place where a binary build can be downloaded ?
>
Two ideas:
1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a "technology preview" for CentOS 6.6, or so
this article claims
http://n
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Two ideas:
>
> 1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a "technology preview" for CentOS 6.6, or so
> this article claims
>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/CentOS-6-6-Features-OpenJDK-8-Support-463730.shtml
>
> 2. Since Oracle Linux is userland-binar
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 22:04 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:50:17 -0600
> >
> > On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:07:47 -0600
> > Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> >
> > > I also changed the boot level to 5.
> >
> > Do you me
On 01/12/14 18:36, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 22:04 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:50:17 -0600
>>>
>>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:07:47 -0600
>>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>>
I also chan
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:50:42 +
Ned Slider wrote:
> So the system will perform a cold reboot, but not a warm reboot. Sounds
> like a hardware issue to me.
I had a computer that did that a few years ago. It would reboot about every
third time you started it up, otherwise it would hang.
Didn'
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:50:42 +
> Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> So the system will perform a cold reboot, but not a warm reboot. Sounds
>> like a hardware issue to me.
>
> I had a computer that did that a few years ago. It would reboot about every
Dave Johansen wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086971
I have been able to reproduce the above issue on my home network and at
work, but RedHat is claiming it is not a bug, so can some people on this
list give it a try and see if they can reproduce it?
If you connect with '-v
Hey,
We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice
code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write
side, Red Hat BZ#771868.
I have not been able to figure out if this bugfix is included in any CentOS
r
On 01/12/14 20:33, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice
> code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write
> side, Red Hat BZ#771868.
>
> I have not been a
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years,
> but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups
> I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear.
To be honest, this was a test post,
to see if I could post directly t
On 01/12/14 20:48, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 01/12/14 20:33, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in
>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice
>> code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write
>> sid
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I found that I can indeed post to the centos newsgroup.
> But for some reason I cannot post directly
> to the corresponding Fedora newsgroup,
> gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general,
> though I can send email to the corresponding mailing list,
> us...@lists.fedoraproject.org .
On Monday 01 December 2014 16:00:44 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years,
> >> but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups
> >> I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear.
> >
> > To be honest,
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar
with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box
before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site,
where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away.
That’s t
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar
> with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box
> before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the
> site, wh
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 14:48, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs
>> familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for
>> the box before we ship it, then w
On 12/01/14 05:30, Ashish Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I just assembled a new machine.
>>
>> Mother Board: Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3
>> Processor: AMD FX8350
>> Memory: Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 2x8 GB
>> Video:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>
>>
>>> We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs
>>> familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for
>>> the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out
>>> to
On 12/02/2014 10:35 AM, Warren Young wrote:
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar
with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box
before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site,
where they just pl
Dear All
I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that
it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please
confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
On 12/02/2014 10:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that
it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please
confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ?
It is generally unsafe to run a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/14 08:29, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
> Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues
> warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported.
> Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can
> be
On 02/12/14 02:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that
it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please
confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ?
Thank you
The heartbleed and shells
33 matches
Mail list logo
