On 11/11/2014 11:51 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Thanks Gotz,
>
> I'll definitely do some storage on them, Gluster/DRBD/ISCSI, but also general
> traffic; I just want to replace 1 Gbps as much as possible, budgets allows.
>
lots of infiniband stuff, 20gbps grade, exceptionally cheap off ebay.
--
Karanb
From: Gilbert Sebenste
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Frank Cox wrote:
>> yum install nm-connection-editor
> Yeah, I'm having a tough day, THAT is where it should be found,
> but isn't, under Gnome, on this one machine. Typing what you did above
> gave me an error of "no such package". I then tried yum
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 11/12/2014 12:10 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Gilbert Sebenste
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Frank Cox wrote:
yum install nm-connection-editor
Yeah, I'm having a tough day, THAT is where it should be found,
but isn't, under Gnome, on this one machine. Typing what you did above
gave me an error of
Hello,
We are using CentOS 6.6 and keepalived 1.2.13 on two servers for
failover, no load-balancing. Failover is governed by the NIC being
present, and the Apache and Tomcat processes being present. Both servers
are configured as 'EQUAL' (not master/backup). An initial priority of
100 is set, and
On Tue, November 11, 2014 13:05, Alexander Farber wrote:
> And ignore the Chrome people getting
> the certificate warning at https://harte-lyne.ca too ;-)
>
We operate our own CA. If you 'TRUST' us then you can add the the root cert
for our CA by visiting http://ca.harte-lyne.ca/CA_HLL_ISSUER_0
On Tue, November 11, 2014 19:33, Igor Zubkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
>> Dear James,
>>
>> everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to
>> Centos list) are there. Noone else is there but you.
>>
>> Please finally fix your MX records or
On Wed, November 12, 2014 8:26 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, November 11, 2014 13:05, Alexander Farber wrote:
>> And ignore the Chrome people getting
>> the certificate warning at https://harte-lyne.ca too ;-)
>>
>
> We operate our own CA.
Yes, that is what I was doing for years too (till
On Wed, November 12, 2014 8:50 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, November 11, 2014 19:33, Igor Zubkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
>>> Dear James,
>>>
>>> everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to
>>> Centos list) are there. Noone e
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:27 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Horne wrote:
> >
> > We are using CentOS 6.6 and keepalived 1.2.13 on two servers for
> > failover, no load-balancing. Failover is governed by the NIC being
> > present, and the Apache and Tomcat processes being present. Both servers
+1 to your logrotate thought; I'd dig deeper there.
check /var/lib/logrotate.status; see if it doesn't match up with days the
failover happens, that different httpd logs are rotating.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> But, the mail server is not broken. It is entirely to RFC specifications.
> Google decides how to treat the resulting confusion respecting mail forwarded
> by the CentOS list. Yahoo I understand simply drops it into the bit bucket and
> t
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
to put social pressure on him. Please move this to private mail and
understand that Gmail is *not* what rules email best practice and also try
to un
On Wed, November 12, 2014 9:46 am, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
> all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
> to put social pressure on him. Please move this to private mail and
> understand that Gmai
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
> all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
> to put social pressure on him.
Well, no. Per the headers:
Authentication-Results: mx.goog
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Horne wrote:
> >>
> > They are both virtual servers - so no UPS. Failover communication is
> > over the network.
>
> Um, bingo: are the host systems on UPS's? What happens on the *host*
> systems at 03:56? They don't, perhaps, take
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, James B. Byrne
> wrote:
> >
> > But, the mail server is not broken. It is entirely to RFC
> specifications.
> > Google decides how to treat the resulting confusion respecting mail
> forwarded
> > by the Cen
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
>> all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
>> to put social pressure on him.
>
Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:07 -0600:
> Well, no.
Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's
problem on t
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:07 -0600:
>
>> Well, no.
>
> Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
> guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
> Gmail then please
Once upon a time, Kai Schaetzl said:
> Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
> guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
> Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's
> problem on this list what Gmail doe
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Kai Schaetzl said:
>> Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
>> guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
>> Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's r
On 11/12/2014 10:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl
> wrote:
>> That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's
>> wrong at all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out
>> loud to the list to put social pressure on him.
very go
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 15:44 +, Richard Mann wrote:
>
> +1 to your logrotate thought; I'd dig deeper there.
>
> check /var/lib/logrotate.status; see if it doesn't match up with days
> the failover happens, that different httpd logs are rotating.
>
Given that failover only occurs if Apache, T
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number
keys.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Cian Mc Govern
wrote:
> On 8 November 2014 13:52, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> > > On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, g wrote:
>
>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
>> smtp.mail=centos-boun...@centos.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not
>> verify) header.i=@; dmarc=fail (p=QUARAN
The folks at my office have acquired a new Epson EasyMP wireless projector,
which requires a windows/MacOS plugin to use. Of course, they don't provide
one for Linux.
Here's their web page on it:
http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/support/supDetail.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&infoType=Overview&oid=359
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 16:45 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Horne wrote:
>
> > Given that failover only occurs if Apache, Tomcat or the NIC fail, I
> > can't find anything in log rotation that could cause this effect. For
> > failover to occur the Apache/Tomcat process must be non-existent (
On 12 November 2014 @20:50 zulu, g wrote:
i believe problems are on your end, and not with server for James. i
do not see "dmarc=fail" or "p=QUARANTINE" in *any* of his email headers.
I think you're not seeing the full headers, then.
e.g. most of the headers of a recent message in here from Ja
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Darr247 wrote:
> On 12 November 2014 @20:50 zulu, g wrote:
>>
>> i believe problems are on your end, and not with server for James. i do
>> not see "dmarc=fail" or "p=QUARANTINE" in *any* of his email headers.
>
>
> I think you're not seeing the full headers, then.
On 12 November 2014 @22:47 zulu, Darr247 wrote:
On 12 November 2014 @20:50 zulu, g wrote:
i believe problems are on your end, and not with server for James. i
do not see "dmarc=fail" or "p=QUARANTINE" in *any* of his email headers.
I think you're not seeing the full headers, then.
e.g. most o
I have a Brother MFC 7360N, and it is refusing to print.
Given a job, the printer state shows, "Sending data to printer"; the file
is in the spool dir; the job queue is empty, and nothing more happens.
I had used the Brother driver installer, and ran into a 32-bit problem. The
rpm runs braddprint
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:10:44PM -0500, Negative wrote:
> I have a Brother MFC 7360N, and it is refusing to print.
>
> Given a job, the printer state shows, "Sending data to printer"; the file
> is in the spool dir; the job queue is empty, and nothing more happens.
>
> I had used the Brother dr
On 11/13/2014 12:10 PM, Negative wrote:
> I have a Brother MFC 7360N, and it is refusing to print.
I have a DCP-540CN which is a similar but I think older network printer.
I haven't tried it on CentOS 7 yet, but got it to work with Fedora 18
and 19 which are very similar. I do recall having to c
Hi all,
Did anybody notice a really slow access from Windows 7 (especially from the MS
Office suite) when trying to open a Word-doc for example, that sits on a samba
share on a computer recently upgraded to CentOS 6.6?
It can take up to two-three minutes to open a 20 kB Word-doc...
I tested wi
35 matches
Mail list logo
