That's exactly what I mean. It's not a matter of "starting into the Windows
world". My point was that Windows admins have not become obsessed with
"uptime", and hence given their users the expectation of 100% availability.
I'm all for being responsible to users - and that means patching and if
tha
I used to work with IBM mainframes back when the dinosaurs were hatchlings.
At one place I worked the machine was powered off on Friday at 5pm and
powered up at 7am on Monday! Can you imagine that these days?
We soon went to 24x7, but the reason was not because the users wanted it.
It was because
On 10/30/2014 1:07 AM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
I used to work with IBM mainframes back when the dinosaurs were hatchlings.
At one place I worked the machine was powered off on Friday at 5pm and
powered up at 7am on Monday! Can you imagine that these days?
We soon went to 24x7, but the reason was not
Bending a spoon 100 times it will break.. Keep temp the same hot or cold no
bends.. thus the tracks do not break...
Its not 22Deg Celsius or 28Deg it is keeping the temp the same, as the temp
changes the metal expands and contracts..
Regards Michael Cole
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:21:22
On 30/10/14 01:43, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 10/29/14 07:03, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 29/10/14 03:09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/28/2014 09:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 10/28/14 21:13, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Hey Y'all,
>>
From: "reynie...@gmail.com"
>location ~ \.php$ {
>include /etc/nginx/fastcgi_params;
>fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
>fastcgi_index index.php;
>fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $root$fastcgi_script_name;
>
Hello All,
the update to Centos6.6 got interrupted on a laptop.
I then did this:
package-cleanup --cleandupes
yum-complete-transaction
and remove and reinstall the latest kernel.
I now get an error message when booting:
/dev/mapper/vg_jvermeulen-lv_home does not exist.
I can boot into single us
Does "vgchange -ay" improve the situation in any way?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Johan Vermeulen"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:20:40
> Subject: [CentOS] lost a lvm after updat
On 10/29/2014 11:01 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:56:58AM +, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> iptables -A table-name -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
>>
>> No reboot needed. 'table-name' can be INPUT or another user defined
>> table name.
>>
>> firewall-cmd with its Windoze-li
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:56:58 +
Always Learning wrote:
> iptables -A table-name -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
>
> No reboot needed. 'table-name' can be INPUT or another user defined
> table name.
>
> firewall-cmd with its Windoze-like structure and syntax is definitely
> unappealing to many no
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:24:02 +1300
Peter wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 04:16 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> > yes, so I just figured out. Thank you so much. Where does
> > `semanage` come from? I tried policycoreutils-python but it cannot
> > be found.
>
> It should be in policycoreutils-python.
Hello,
thanks very much for the very fast reply.
Something that I did made it wors, because file system is now read-only.
I will try to use rescue mode from a Centos-dvd, use chroot, and try the
vgchange-command.
Greetings, Johan
op 30-10-14 12:25, Nux! schreef:
Does "vgchange -ay" improve
On Thu, October 30, 2014 3:01 am, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> That's exactly what I mean. It's not a matter of "starting into the
> Windows
> world". My point was that Windows admins have not become obsessed with
> "uptime", and hence given their users the expectation of 100%
> availability.
>
> I'm all
Once upon a time, Valeri Galtsev said:
> If I remember Unix world, patching almost never led to downtime and almost
> always could be accomplished in presence of users logged in.
I think that's a rose-colored glasses look in the rear-view mirror. The
"traditional" Unix flavors I dealt with (Sola
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 08:00:16AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> If I remember Unix world, patching almost never led to downtime and almost
> always could be accomplished in presence of users logged in.
RHEL has kpatch:
http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/02/26/kpatch/
Technologies like kpatch, kspl
On 10/30/2014 8:38 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:56:58 +
Always Learning wrote:
iptables -A table-name -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
No reboot needed. 'table-name' can be INPUT or another user defined
table name.
firewall-cmd with its Windoze-like structure and syntax i
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 12:38 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Incidentally, since I started using Linux I have always found iptables
> to have a very user-unfriendly syntax. Whenever I needed to tweak the
> firewall, I had to look up the man page for iptables, in order to make
> sure I don't screw
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 10:01 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 8:38 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
> >
> > and
> >
> > firewall-cmd --add-service=http
> To do this in cmd line on Windows:
>
> netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=h
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 21:07 +1300, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> I used to work with IBM mainframes back when the dinosaurs were hatchlings.
> At one place I worked the machine was powered off on Friday at 5pm and
> powered up at 7am on Monday! Can you imagine that these days?
In my early days, the entir
On Thu, October 30, 2014 6:54 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 11:01 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:56:58AM +, Always Learning wrote:
>>>
>>> iptables -A table-name -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
>>>
>>> No reboot needed. 'table-name' can be INPUT or another use
On 10/31/2014 01:20 AM, Always Learning wrote:
-R 4web 5 -p tcp --dport 888 -s 192.168.2.1/23 -j ACCEPT
That will only work if you want to permit from source addresses in the
192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 netblocks. I think you want a -s 192.168.1.1/23
When I was first starting out in IT, I was
On 10/30/2014 10:20 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 10:01 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
On 10/30/2014 8:38 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
and
firewall-cmd --add-service=http
To do this in cmd line on Windows:
netsh advfir
On 29/10/14 15:32, Mark Felder wrote:
>
> I don't understand the direction that has been taken. Anything that runs
> on 6.0 should run flawlessly on 6.6. Period.
I agree, and the way to help make that happen ( and to help document and
track down breakage before this gets released ), is to submit
Hi,
Updating selinux-policy-targeted to 3.7.19-260 fails. The archive seems
corrupt. Got another copy from
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/ which also fails:
# rpm -Fv selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch.rpm
Preparing packages for installation...
selinux-policy-tar
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:04:32 +
Always Learning wrote:
>
> The order of rules in any IPtables table is pure common sense and very
> logical. Essentially, the first rule is the first action. The second
> rule is the second action etc.
Sure, I do know how it works. :-) However, the iptables req
Hi,
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:49 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> file /usr/share/selinux/targeted/audioentropy.pp.bz2: cpio: rename
> failed - Input/output error
Sorry for crying wolf guys, I thought the archive was corrupt but
apparently it's my file system.
Regards,
Leonard.
--
mount -
On 10/30/2014 10:49 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Updating selinux-policy-targeted to 3.7.19-260 fails. The archive seems
> corrupt. Got another copy from
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/ which also fails:
>
> # rpm -Fv selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6.n
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 11:32 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Millions of users have installed that package ...
Yeah sorry Johnny, should have thought of that before reporting "the
issue".
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
___
CentOS mail
I updated my backup server to CentOS 6.6 this morning. As usual, I
unmounted the current (nightly) tape from the changer before the
reboot. Now Bacula complains it cannot access the changer:
3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded? drive 0" command.
3991 Bad autochanger "loaded? drive 0" command: ERR=
On 10/31/2014 06:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1764 Moderate
>
> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1764.html
Note to CentOS 5 users. RedHat does not plan to release a fixed wget
for EL5. You can mitigate this vulnerability
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 10/31/2014 06:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1764 Moderate
>>
>> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1764.html
>
> Note to CentOS 5 users. RedHat does not plan to release a fi
I recently installed Centos 7 on a new desktop, and I intended to put XFCE
on it, but I think I made a mistake by choosing the Legacy-X group, and now
I'm puzzled as to what I have.
I thought my first boot would be into runlevel 3, but I got a gui that
looks like an odd mix of Gnome 2 and KDE. The
While I'm a long-time iptables user I will be the first to admit it is
terribly difficult to work with. If you are starting from scratch
firewall-cmd makes a lot of sense, just like realmd greatly simplifies
the bind process to Active Directory.
It's good to know the underpinnings, but the bottom
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 1:07 AM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
>
>> I used to work with IBM mainframes back when the dinosaurs were
>> hatchlings.
>> At one place I worked the machine was powered off on Friday at 5pm and
>> powered up at 7am on Monday! Can you i
On 10/31/2014 11:54 AM, Negative wrote:
> One option now is to install XFCE, but I don't know how that works.
That's actually pretty easy:
yum install epel-release
yum install @xfce
Then you just change your desktop environment to xfce at the login screen.
Peter
> Things break and need maintenance. If your services can't tolerate
> that, you need more redundancy. As for the OS updates (which are
> only one of the many things that can break...), they are 'pretty well'
> vetted by upstream so breakage is rare and your odds are better
> installing them tha
Folks
I'm sure the Centos team has done a yeoman's job getting Centos7
ready, and that the Redhat team has done marvels in creating rhel7,
but here's a little voice from a personal hobbyist user.
Background:
('ve been maintaining several remote servers since Redhat 6 days,
migrating from th
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>> Things break and need maintenance. If your services can't tolerate
>> that, you need more redundancy. As for the OS updates (which are
>> only one of the many things that can break...), they are 'pretty well'
>> vetted by upstream so break
On 10/31/2014 01:45 AM, david wrote:
Folks
I'm sure the Centos team has done a yeoman's job getting Centos7 ready,
and that the Redhat team has done marvels in creating rhel7, but here's
a little voice from a personal hobbyist user.
Background:
('ve been maintaining several remote servers sin
On 10/31/2014 01:45 PM, david wrote:
> 1: Firewall changes
> The change in firewall technology forced a complete re-do of my scripts
> which maintain firewalls, respond to attacks, etc. I think I've
> programmed my way around the issues, but it wasn't easy.
It's trivial to disable firewalld the
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:45:58PM -0700, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> I'm sure the Centos team has done a yeoman's job getting Centos7
> ready, and that the Redhat team has done marvels in creating rhel7,
> but here's a little voice from a personal hobbyist user.
>
> Background:
> ('ve been maintai
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:45:58PM -0700, david wrote:
> 1: Firewall changes
Remove firewalld; install iptables. Problem solved. This has been
discussed ad nauseum on this list recently.
> 2: Apache changes
Not RedHat specific issues; that's just progress from upstream.
> 3: Service -> syst
Folks
I have a ZFS file system. It seems to be scrubbing too often. As I
type, it's 5 hours into the process with 36 hours to go, and seems to
be doing it several times a week on a slow drive.
I cannot find an option to control the frequency; crontab has no
references. Any clues?
David
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 01:25 +1100, Steve Walsh wrote:
> On 10/31/2014 01:20 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> > -R 4web 5 -p tcp --dport 888 -s 192.168.2.1/23 -j ACCEPT
> That will only work if you want to permit from source addresses in the
> 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 netblocks. I think you want
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 09:27 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Thu, October 30, 2014 6:54 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > You can turn off firewalld and use iptables if that is the desire. That
> > is what I have done on my test machines.
> At the moment this can be a solution. But one day this op
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 10:34 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 10:20 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 10:01 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/30/2014 8:38 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >
> >>> iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
> >>>
> >>> and
>
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:14 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Sure, I do know how it works. :-) However, the iptables requires me to
> think about it when specifying -I or -A every time I modify the rules.
When I set-up a server, I devise the rules and the sub-systems that
interface with IPtables
On 10/30/2014 6:47 PM, david wrote:
I have a ZFS file system. It seems to be scrubbing too often. As I
type, it's 5 hours into the process with 36 hours to go, and seems to
be doing it several times a week on a slow drive.
I cannot find an option to control the frequency; crontab has no
ref
On 10/30/2014 7:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Your wish to delegate a
simple placement to the software suggests you are not well familiar with
the design and construction of your IPtables firewall.
get off your soapbox, its not becoming.
--
john r pierce
On Thu, October 30, 2014 9:42 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:14 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
>> Sure, I do know how it works. :-) However, the iptables requires me to
>> think about it when specifying -I or -A every time I modify the rules.
>
> When I set-up a server, I
OK, I found it. Is this option documented somewhere? Are there
other frequency settings? like once-a-month?
At 08:15 PM 10/30/2014, you wrote:
On 10/30/2014 6:47 PM, david wrote:
I have a ZFS file system. It seems to be scrubbing too often. As
I type, it's 5 hours into the process with 3
On 10/30/2014 8:46 PM, david wrote:
OK, I found it. Is this option documented somewhere? Are there other
frequency settings? like once-a-month?
i've only used ZFS on solaris, where there are no automatic scrubs
unless you script your own via cron, and freeNAS where they are done at
interval
Dear All,
since upgrading from 6.5 to 6.6 I get the following error message when
trying to start a VM in virt-manager:
Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: Domain
requires KVM, but it is not available. Check that
virtualization is enabled in the host BIOS, and
On 10/31/2014 07:00 AM, Chris wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know what the issue is?
[root@cd chris]# modprobe kvm_intel
FATAL: Error inserting kvm_intel
(/lib/modules/2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64/kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko):
Operation not supported
It was no problem in 6.5 ...
--
Gruß,
Christia
55 matches
Mail list logo
