On 10/27/2014 09:08 PM, Ted Miller wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 10:35 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Ted Miller wrote:
>>
>>> I have not tried an upgrade, but it sounds like they put the work into
>>> making server upgrades easier, but did not (or could not) make it as
>>> easy
>>> for desktop installation
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:08 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> what do you get from the commands:
>
> pvs -v
> vgs -v
> lvs
>
> and, if pvs shows any /dev/mdXX devices, the output of mdadm --detail
> /dev/mdXX
>
Hi John, here are the results:
#pvs -v
Scanning for physical volume names
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I have run upgrades on several test VMs and they did upgrade, but I
> don't think I would upgrade anything in production in place. And this
> is not just advise I would give for CentOS .. I would also not upgrade
> anything in place (Not Windows from XP to Win7 to Win8 .. n
On 10/28/2014 07:57 AM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
# lvs
/dev/root: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 27522957312: Input/output error
/dev/root: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 27523014656: Input/output error
Couldn't find device with uuid vSbuSJ-o1Kh-N3ur-JYkM-Ktr4-WEO2-JWe2wS.
LV
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> Please post the output from
>ls -l /dev/root /dev/mapper
> and the contents of file /etc/lvm/backup/vg_devserver .
>
Here,
# ls -l /dev/root /dev/mapper
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Oct 27 17:55 /dev/root -> dm-2
/dev/mapper:
total 0
Hi Guys,
I am encountering this bug: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7656
I put in the CentOS 7 DVD and it starts to install and hangs with starting
x.
The suggestion was made in the bug report to boot using the 'kernel-ml' and
to be honest I don't know how to do that.
I build a machine tha
> PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree DevSize PV UUID
> /dev/sda2 vg_devserver lvm2 a-- 29.51g 0 79.51g
> ij17Vf-kY56-jfg0-j769-Z1E5-Nk7C-RqYG18
> unknown device vg_devserver lvm2 a-m 29.99g 29.96g 0
> vSbuSJ-o1Kh-N3ur-JYkM-Ktr4-WEO2-JWe2wS
>
>
By looking at
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Dominic Geevarghese
wrote:
> By looking at fdisk output pasted in your first mail, I don't see more than
> 2 partition in your first disk - /dev/sda .
> The first partition is - /dev/sda1 - is allocated for /boot and
> second partition is - /dev/sda2 - for you
Ok. I think, I should know
- whether you have rebooted your machine/VM right after extended the disk
? If not, please don't reboot now :)
- Other than attaching an additional disk, have you tried any lvm/dd
commands or any other procedure that's missed in your previous update ?
__
Disclaimer : I have not tested kernel-ml yet. Use/install it your own risk.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle <
slackmoeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am encountering this bug: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7656
> [...]
> Can anyone give me a hand?
>
>From an
On 10/28/2014 10:30 AM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right in some moment I added a new disk and try to extend the VG and
yes once again I removed by trying to do the same from Gparted Live CD and
I messed all, this is what I'm trying to fix if it's possible so what
procedure I should follow
Just letting everyone here know, CentOS-6.6 is now released:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-October/020709.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.
On 28/10/14 12:17 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Just letting everyone here know, CentOS-6.6 is now released:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-October/020709.html
\o/
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> Yes, that would have helped a lot. I can see in file
> /etc/lvm/backup/vg_devserver that the lv_root LV has been extended by a
> mere 32 Megabytes (yes, Mega) on the missing physical volume. Do you
> still have the additional disk? The b
yum -y update
Thanks! :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Johnny Hughes"
> To: "CentOS ML"
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 October, 2014 16:17:15
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-6.6 is Released
> Just letting everyone here know, Cen
On 10/28/2014 11:42 AM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
Yes, that would have helped a lot. I can see in file
/etc/lvm/backup/vg_devserver that the lv_root LV has been extended by a
mere 32 Megabytes (yes, Mega) on the missing physical volume.
Hello,
After updating to 6.6 I've lost my connection to my tape library.
Old log file (6.5):
Sep 13 08:17:51 server1 kernel: scsi 1:2:0:0: Sequential-Access HP
Ultrium 5-SCSI Z65W PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
Sep 13 08:17:51 server1 kernel: scsi 1:2:0:1: Medium Changer HP
1x8 G2 AUTOLDR 4.20
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> You will have to find the archived configuration from before you tried to
> extend that LV, and restore that configuration. Let's see what file you
> have. Post the output from
>
>grep -H 'description =' /etc/lvm/archive/vg_devserver*
I'm developing a driver on Centos 7:
# uname -a && cat /etc/redhat-release
Linux czlab04.coveloz.local 3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep
22 19:06:58 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core)
When I install my module it's 'tainting' the kernel.
Rath
On 10/28/2014 12:42 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
# grep -H 'description =' /etc/lvm/archive/vg_devserver*
/etc/lvm/archive/vg_devserver_0-1387802225.vg:description = "Created
*before* executing '/sbin/vgs --noheadings -o name --config
'log{command_names=0 prefix=\" \"}''"
/etc/lvm/archive/
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> That all there are??? By default that archive should go back a minimum of
> 30 days and a minimum of 10 files, whichever is larger. All I see here is
> a history of your recovery efforts. Did you make that change from a live
> CD, or som
Have you tried to boot the os using 6.5 kernel and see any difference ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/28/2014 01:25 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I attached the file here but also will be nice to extend the LVM so it
can grow up until not empty space leave.
The attachment didn't come through, but I can use the file that you posted
before. The PV you have is completely used, but res
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> The attachment didn't come through, but I can use the file that you posted
> before. The PV you have is completely used, but restoring this
> configuration
> should get you back to a state where you can try again to extend the VG to
> a ne
Nevermind I fixed this is the result of running the command in test mode:
# vgcfgrestore -v --file LVMconfig.new vg_devserver --test
File descriptor 7 (pipe:[18995]) leaked on vgcfgrestore invocation. Parent
PID 3790: bash
TEST MODE: Metadata will NOT be updated and volumes will not be
(de)activ
On 10/28/2014 01:58 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
Nevermind I fixed this is the result of running the command in test mode:
# vgcfgrestore -v --file LVMconfig.new vg_devserver --test
File descriptor 7 (pipe:[18995]) leaked on vgcfgrestore invocation. Parent
PID 3790: bash
TEST MODE: Metadata
I have an SIIG SC-SA4011 (V1.0) SATA controller that doesn't appear to come
up. The system has CentOS 6.5 installed on it, and everything on it works,
except for this one controller - the other SATA controller, a RocketRAID
1640 works fine. lspci lists the offending controller:
$> lspci
[... snip
On 10/28/2014 07:33 PM, Dominic Geevarghese wrote:
Have you tried to boot the os using 6.5 kernel and see any difference ?
Good point.
The previous kernel works ok.
I also have forgotten to say that I use centos plus kernels:
2.6.32-504.el6.centos.plus.x86_64: Does not work
2.6.32-431.29.2.e
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> That looks good. I understand the I/O error now. It is from an attempt to
> read from the missing PV. The one question I have is, "Did you ever resize
> the root filesystem?" I suspect not, since you would have seen errors from
> the mi
On 10/28/2014 02:47 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, done:
vgcfgrestore -v --file LVMconfig.new vg_devserver
File descriptor 7 (pipe:[18995]) leaked on vgcfgrestore invocation. Parent
PID 3790: bash
/dev/root: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 27522957312: Input/output error
/dev/root: rea
Well I reboot the VM and now it does not boot up with kernel panic seems
like this is bad. See attached image.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 02:47 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, done:
>>
>> vgcfgrestore -v --file LVMconfig.new vg_devserver
>>
On 10/28/2014 08:47 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 10/28/2014 07:33 PM, Dominic Geevarghese wrote:
Have you tried to boot the os using 6.5 kernel and see any difference ?
Good point.
The previous kernel works ok.
I also have forgotten to say that I use centos plus kernels:
2.6.32-504.el6.centos
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Digimer wrote:
On 28/10/14 12:17 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Just letting everyone here know, CentOS-6.6 is now released:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-October/020709.html
\o/
What he said! :-)
Thank you, O wondrous CentOS team!
--
Paul Heinle
On 10/28/2014 03:06 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I reboot the VM and now it does not boot up with kernel panic seems
like this is bad. See attached image.
Again, your attachments aren't coming through. Did you try running vgs and lvs
before rebooting? What was the result?
--
Bob Nicho
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> Again, your attachments aren't coming through. Did you try running vgs
> and lvs
> before rebooting? What was the result?
>
That's weird maybe the list is configured to not allow attachments and no I
didn't try any just reboot after the
Hey guys,
Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
[root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name www \)
/usr/lib/httpd
/usr/lib64/httpd
/var/www/vhosts/johnnyenglish/httpdocs
/var/www/lpadde
On 10/28/2014 11:00 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
[root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name www \)
/usr/lib/httpd
/usr/lib64/httpd
/var/www/
On 10/28/2014 03:45 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
Again, your attachments aren't coming through. Did you try running vgs
and lvs
before rebooting? What was the result?
That's weird maybe the list is configured to not allow attachmen
Hi
find / -name "*httpd*" -type d |grep -v www\
Thanks.. Ideally I'd like to use the -delete flag to find once i have the
right command. But with that I suppose I could use find / -name "*httpd*"
-type d |grep -v www\ | xargs rm -rfv
Assuming that the initial find doesn't do anything too scary
2014-10-28 23:00 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy :
> Hey guys,
>
> Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
> variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
>
>
> [root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name www
> \)
> /usr/lib/httpd
> /usr/lib64/ht
>
> In centos, the apache package is named httpd, not apache. try removing the
> packages first. (yum remove httpd)
Yup! Already done. I did say I removed apache packages, realizing the name
of the package is actually httpd in centos. My bad for not communicating
clearly. This exercise is just t
On 10/28/2014 04:00 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
[root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name www \)
/usr/lib/httpd
/usr/lib64/httpd
/var/www/
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> The list does allow attachments. The file I sent you was an attachment.
>
I do not know why then my attachment are not attached, anyway here I
uploaded the image http://imgur.com/B7YWY10
>
> I wish you hadn't jumped right into rebooting
On 10/28/2014 12:41 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After updating to 6.6 I've lost my connection to my tape library.
>
> Old log file (6.5):
>
> Sep 13 08:17:51 server1 kernel: scsi 1:2:0:0: Sequential-Access HP
> Ultrium 5-SCSI Z65W PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
> Sep 13 08:17:51 server1 kernel:
On 10/28/2014 07:59 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 12:41 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After updating to 6.6 I've lost my connection to my tape library.
>>
>> Old log file (6.5):
>>
>> Sep 13 08:17:51 server1 kernel: scsi 1:2:0:0: Sequential-Access HP
>> Ultrium 5-SCSI Z
Hey Y'all,
After upgrade to 6.6 my gui will not start. The problem is probably
related to the dusty old video card I've got in this crusty old machine.
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation G73 [GeForce 7600
GS] (rev a2)
I've got the proprietary drivers installed. Normally when
On 10/28/14 21:13, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> After upgrade to 6.6 my gui will not start. The problem is probably
> related to the dusty old video card I've got in this crusty old machine.
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation G73 [GeForce 7600
> GS] (rev a2)
>
>
On 10/28/2014 09:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 10/28/14 21:13, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Hey Y'all,
>>
>> After upgrade to 6.6 my gui will not start. The problem is probably
>> related to the dusty old video card I've got in this crusty old machine.
>>
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA
OK. That's great. I would try following
1. Boot using working kernel.
2. Verify the associated modules loaded.
3. Boot into new kernel, verify the same sets of modules are loaded or not.
4. Like it said in one of the post below, you can try 'modinfo `hpsa module
name*` from newer kernel. If no res
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 09:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> On 10/28/14 21:13, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>> Hey Y'all,
>>>
>>> After upgrade to 6.6 my gui will not start. The problem is probably
>>> related to the dusty old video card I've got in this crust
Snippet from another thread posted yesterday
--+-
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7656
--+---
This might be related to the issue you are facing.
I assume that, kmod-nv* pkgs that you have installed is not compatible with
the graphics card. You might need to check with other
Devin Reade wrote:
> Just a heads up, if anyone is doing QT development with the EPEL
> RPMs, the update from RHEL 6.5 to 6.6 breaks the current qt5 RPMS.
> In fact, I had to uninstall qt5 to perform the update.
>
> I've submitted a bug report upstream, so hopefully it'll get resolved
> before to
On 10/29/2014 02:02 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
It does not look like it will matter .. that is the same version as is
in the new kernel it seems. (3.4.4)
I haven't used kmod-hpsa before, just the kernel driver.
There are two controllers in the machine using hpsa:
05:00.0 RAID bus controller: H
53 matches
Mail list logo
