No problem, don't forget, rpm.pbone.net is your friend. :)
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Fred Smith"
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Friday, 24 October, 2014 02:32:37
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Resolved] pidgin-si
op 24-10-14 00:52, Kahlil Hodgson schreef:
In case you're not familiar with SOCKS proxies, the aforementioned
setup will allow your browser to connect to the printers web server as
though you were running the browser on remote_server.
___
CentOS mailin
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
A very ignorant question, sans doute.
I get my certificates from cacert.org, to whom I am very grateful.
I follow what I take to be the official procedure,
first creating .key and .csr on my server
and then getting .crt by going to Server Certificate=>New
at the cacert site.
I then place the key
On Fri, October 24, 2014 10:43 am, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> A very ignorant question, sans doute.
>
> I get my certificates from cacert.org, to whom I am very grateful.
> I follow what I take to be the official procedure,
> first creating .key and .csr on my server
> and then getting .crt by going
I have centos 7
I am using:
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background picture-uri
file:///usr/share/backgrounds/gnome/Wood.jpg
to set the background from the command line...
dconf-editor shows the command worked.
But the picture is not updated???
How do I get the desktop to re-draw?
Thanks,
Noticed firefox is one of the only critical sec. updates from 6.6. So I
manually downloaded the rpm from cr repo and rpm -Uvh
firefox-31.2.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
but it crashes with
/usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so: undefined symbol: gdk_window_get_
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 11:53 -0700, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Noticed firefox is one of the only critical sec. updates from 6.6. So I
> manually downloaded the rpm from cr repo and rpm -Uvh
> firefox-31.2.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
>
> but it crashes with
>
> /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: symbol loo
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Phil Wyett <
philwy...@aura-tech-systems.co.uk> wrote:
>
> See:
>
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.6_Release_Notes/bh-chap-desktop_and_graphics.html
>
> You will need to install the new gdk-pixbuf2 package(s). I h
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 15:15, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>
> As you can probably guess by now I am working my way down through my
> outstanding issue list trying to get as many deferred items closed out as I
> can before the next security storm hits.
They stopped? :-)
--
Nate Duehr
denverpi...@me
Being a fan of IPtables and dreading the eventual transition to Centos
7, I wondered if in C7's firewalld an interface can be assigned to a
single zone or to multiple zones such as 'private' and 'trusted'.
For example interface em1 having both trusted and public zones assigned
to it. If multiple
I will take a look.
THANKS!!!
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:24 AM, John R Pierce
> wrote:
> > On 10/23/2014 9:16 AM, Néstor wrote:
> >>
> >> That is the file I am missing. Where can I get a copy of it.
> >
> >
> > from the centos-release RPM
On 10/24/2014 3:49 PM, Néstor wrote:
I will take a look.
the question is, how did these files NOT get installed on a CentOS 5
system? they are part of the most minimal package set. Is this really
CentOS 5, or is it some 3rd party hacked virtual machine based on C5 ?
--
john r pierce
I messed the files up at some point, that is why I am trying to get a hold
of the original repo files
Thanks
On Oct 24, 2014 4:08 PM, "John R Pierce" wrote:
> On 10/24/2014 3:49 PM, Néstor wrote:
>
>> I will take a look.
>>
>
> the question is, how did these files NOT get installed on a CentOS 5
It is Centos 6.5.
On Oct 24, 2014 5:45 PM, "Néstor" wrote:
> I messed the files up at some point, that is why I am trying to get a hold
> of the original repo files
>
> Thanks
> On Oct 24, 2014 4:08 PM, "John R Pierce" wrote:
>
>> On 10/24/2014 3:49 PM, Néstor wrote:
>>
>>> I will take a look.
>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:46:30PM -0700, Néstor wrote:
> It is Centos 6.5.
At the beginning of this thread you said it was CentOS 5. Now it's
CentOS 6.5? Be sure to put the right repo configuration files in
place, because otherwise you'll end up with a very broken system.
--
Jonathan Billings
I just look amd it is 6.5
On Oct 24, 2014 6:04 PM, "Jonathan Billings" wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:46:30PM -0700, Néstor wrote:
> > It is Centos 6.5.
>
> At the beginning of this thread you said it was CentOS 5. Now it's
> CentOS 6.5? Be sure to put the right repo configuration files in
On 10/24/2014 6:06 PM, Néstor wrote:
I just look amd it is 6.5
rpm -ivh
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-6-5.el6.centos.11.1.x86_64.rpm
or
rpm -ivh
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/i386/Packages/centos-release-6-5.el6.centos.11.1.i686.rpm
depending
Thanks
On Oct 24, 2014 6:38 PM, "John R Pierce" wrote:
> On 10/24/2014 6:06 PM, Néstor wrote:
>
>> I just look amd it is 6.5
>>
>
> rpm -ivh http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/
> centos-release-6-5.el6.centos.11.1.x86_64.rpm
>
> or
>
> rpm -ivh http://mirror.centos.org/cento
19 matches
Mail list logo
