Hi,
the updated Amazon Web Service AMI (ami-4ac6653d) has a serious bug.
It is not possible to resize a disk after creating a new volume with a size
greater than 8GB.
resize2fs does nothing.
The previous AMI worked perfectly but is no longer available. This bug is a
show stopper
for using Cent
Hi,
After updating openssl on most of my C6.5-servers needs-restarting reports at
least sshd, ntpd and sendmail.
But on 1 server needs-restarting reports nothing. And yes, sshd, ntpd and
sendmail are running.
All yum-utils are latest yum-utils-1.1.30-17.el6_5.noarch.
openssh-clients-5.3p1-94.
We had Amazon investigate further and support tells us that the problem is that
the old
AMI put the filesystem on the raw disk but the new one is using a partition
table.
Attaching the volume to another instance to change the partition table is not
possible due
to restrictions on marketplace AMI
Am 16.10.2014 um 23:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
> Please note that the CentOS-6.5 updates are built from:
>
> openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.src.rpm
>
> This is the version that Red Hat released for RHEL 6.6 as
> openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.2.src.rpm.
> Notice that the dist tag is different for our rele
On 16/10/14, 15:35, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I missed the beginning of this thread - how is the filesystem mounted?
For ext4, we finally found that it worked well... *if* it was mounted
nobarrier. That made the detar of a compressed tar file go from
literally 7 minutes to about 30-46 seconds.
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi,
I had a C7 virtual machine running on a C7 host for several weeks without
any problems.
Today I rebootet the host and now the virtual machine does not start
anymore.
I can see grub coming up and starting the kernel. After some seconds the
last thing that is visble on the VM console is "ss per
In a somehow unrelated vein, does anyone know if there's going to be an
OpenJDK update to address newest Java vulnerability? Can't seem to find
one at the moment.
PEV
On 10/16/2014 05:55 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
It looks like it has been reported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
On 10/17/2014 10:02 AM, Paul E. Virgo wrote:
>
> In a somehow unrelated vein, does anyone know if there's going to be an
> OpenJDK update to address newest Java vulnerability? Can't seem to find
> one at the moment.
>
There were java updates for c5 and c7 on the 15th (2 days ago). Not
sure if i
On 10/09/2014 04:12 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 12:58 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> OK, I just updated my two CentOS 5 boxes (my laptop and by desktop) and
>> discoved that FF 31 is totally borked -- it seems not to be possible to
>> install either Firebug (either 2.0.4 or 1.12.8) or F
One of the services that has to be restarted after the openssl update is samba.
And now I wonder if I can safely restart samba when there are possible files
in-use (ie writes could be happening).
I can't find an answer on Google (could be me asking the wrong questions)
Thanks for any pointers
I read this on the RHN commentary respecting cve-2014-3566:
https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/10/15/poodle-a-ssl3-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566/:
. . .
The first aspect of POODLE, the SSL 3.0 protocol vulnerability, has already
been fixed through iterative protocol improvements, leading to the
On 17 Oct 2014 16:24, "Patrick Bervoets"
wrote:
>
> One of the services that has to be restarted after the openssl update is
samba.
>
> And now I wonder if I can safely restart samba when there are possible
files in-use (ie writes could be happening).
>
> I can't find an answer on Google (could be
On 10/17/2014 09:53 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> I read this on the RHN commentary respecting cve-2014-3566:
>
>
> https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/10/15/poodle-a-ssl3-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566/:
>
...
>
> If read the advisory aright then TLSv1.0 suffers from exactly the same flaw as
>
Am 17.10.2014 um 19:38 schrieb Thomas Eriksson
:
> On 10/17/2014 09:53 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> I read this on the RHN commentary respecting cve-2014-3566:
>>
>>
>> https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/10/15/poodle-a-ssl3-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566/:
>>
> ...
>>
>> If read the advisor
I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and
the "force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force
user" issues in the 4.1.6 release.
Is there any likelihood of an update from upstream? If not, is there
another repo that provides a more up-to-date v
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and the
"force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force user"
issues in the 4.1.6 release.
Is there any likelihood of an update from upstream? If not, is there anot
On 10/17/2014 2:56 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and the
"force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force user"
issues in the 4.1.6 release.
Is there any likelihood of an
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/17/2014 2:56 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and
> the
> "force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force user"
> is
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> That looked great until I got signed in and realized that they do not
> yet have CentOS 7 packages...
I don't need this so I didn't register and so on, but I'm wondering if they
offer a source rpm package on that site that you might be ab
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > That looked great until I got signed in and realized that they do not
> > yet have CentOS 7 packages...
>
> I don't need this so I didn't register and so on, but I'm wonder
On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
That looked great until I got signed in and realized that they do not
yet have CentOS 7 packages...
I don't need this so I didn't regi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> >>On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
> >>Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >>
> >>>That looked great until I got signed in and realized th
Johnny,
Yes. We've got some 6.5 boxes, so that's why we asked. The few 5.10/.11
boxes did get the updates, so that's why we were curious.
Thanks for the info.
PEV
On 10/17/2014 11:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/17/2014 10:02 AM, Paul E. Virgo wrote:
In a somehow unrelated vein, does anyon
On Fri, October 17, 2014 2:54 pm, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> >On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>> >>On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
>> >>Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
On 10/17/2014 3:54 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
That looked great until I
Hi,
I am still trying to get kick-start centos in my vmware5 because pxe
cannot find the pxe server. I do not control the dhcp or pxe server.
I have both my kickstart file and my iso image for centos6.5 on my
vmware datastore, but am trying to run my kickstart file from VMware guest.
Can I te
On Fri, October 17, 2014 3:55 pm, Dan Hyatt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am still trying to get kick-start centos in my vmware5 because pxe
> cannot find the pxe server. I do not control the dhcp or pxe server.
> I have both my kickstart file and my iso image for centos6.5 on my
> vmware datastore, but am t
On 10/17/2014 1:55 PM, Dan Hyatt wrote:
I am still trying to get kick-start centos in my vmware5 because pxe
cannot find the pxe server. I do not control the dhcp or pxe server.
this is on ESXI? you /could/ create a virtual network thats not routed
or bridged to your actual networks, then c
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Dan Hyatt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am still trying to get kick-start centos in my vmware5 because pxe
> cannot find the pxe server. I do not control the dhcp or pxe server.
>
Bummer.
> I have both my kickstart file and my iso image for centos6.5 on my vmware
> datast
Hello all,
I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns ) running
on CentOS 7. So far I have wirtten the djbdns.service and djbdns.socket
files. The sockets (TCP and UDP 53) for some reason would not start and I
don't know how to debug that; the service does start but only when
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns ) running
> on CentOS 7.
There's an ndjbdns in EPEL - is that something different?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
__
On 17 Oct 2014 23:32, "Boris Epstein" wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns ) running
> on CentOS 7. So far I have wirtten the djbdns.service and djbdns.socket
> files. The sockets (TCP and UDP 53) for some reason would not start and I
> don't kn
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Boris Epstein
> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns )
> running
> > on CentOS 7.
>
> There's an ndjbdns in EPEL - is that something different?
>
> --
On 17 Oct 2014 23:50, "Boris Epstein" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Boris Epstein
> > wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns )
> > running
> > > on CentOS 7.
> >
On 2014-10-17, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
> I am trying to get djbdns ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns ) running
> on CentOS 7.
Is there a particular reason you prefer djbdns? In my experience it is
extremely difficult to use without DJB's daemontools, and its zone file
syntax is very nonstanda
36 matches
Mail list logo
