Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 kernel panic on boot after upgrading kernel to 2.6.32-431.29.2

2014-10-16 Thread Joakim Ziegler
On 15/10/14, 1:58, Greg Lindahl wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:56:23AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: The advise to do a full upgrade is the best (most secure) option .. however, theoretically, the new kernel should boot and not cause issues based on the other packages. OP said he had an In

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 kernel panic on boot after upgrading kernel to 2.6.32-431.29.2

2014-10-16 Thread Joakim Ziegler
On 15/10/14, 8:22, Lamar Owen wrote: First question: can you boot with the old kernel still (by default CentOS 6 leaves a few old kernels around; I want to say the default is 3, but it might be 5, I don't recall, and I don't have a straight default C6 install to check against right at the moment

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.11 / Firefox 31 -- totally borked...

2014-10-16 Thread Lars Hecking
> > It looks like it has been reported > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150082 > > Good, at least its not my fault, this time :) firefox-31.2.0-3.el5.centos is still broken, as is upstream's package. The bug report has already been updated. What is also broken, again, is

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 116, Issue 9

2014-10-16 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Loss of Ethernet adaptor

2014-10-16 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:41 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > This is a return to an issue I first raised back in June. We had a similar > occurrence in September while I was away and so I am revisiting the entire > matter. > > Steve Clark on 6 Jun 16:02 2014 wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We ran into this proble

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem writes unexpectedly slow (CentOS 6.4)

2014-10-16 Thread Joakim Ziegler
On 14/10/14, 6:45, Peter Kjellström wrote: On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:15:11 -0500 Joakim Ziegler wrote: ... So, if I use iozone -a to test write speeds on the raw device, I get results in the 500-800MB/sec range, depending on write sizes, which is about what I'd expect. However, when I have a

[CentOS] POODLE on CentOS

2014-10-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
The following updates address POODLE on CentOS: CentOS-5: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-October/020696.html CentOS-6.5: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-October/020697.html CentOS-7: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-October/020

[CentOS] POODLE on CentOS

2014-10-16 Thread James B. Byrne
According to the centos wiki: Validating Changes You can use Qualys SSL Labs to verify that your web server is no longer vulnerable to POODLE or TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV once all action is complete. You might also want to only use TLSv1.2 for httpd on CentOS-6.5 (or higher) and CentOS-7, while using TLS

Re: [CentOS] POODLE on CentOS

2014-10-16 Thread Tharun Kumar Allu
Modifying apache configuration to the following should take care of it. The SSLProtocol directive disables SSLv2 and SSLv3 and leaves other on. SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 -SSLv3 SSLHonorCipherOrder on SSLCipherSuite "EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM EECDH+ECDSA+SHA384 EECDH+ECDSA+SHA256 EECDH+aRSA

Re: [CentOS] POODLE on CentOS

2014-10-16 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
The following nmap invocation may also be helpful with testing: nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 hostname Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd Suite 1416 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC